• To anyone looking to acquire commercial radio programming software:

    Please do not make requests for copies of radio programming software which is sold (or was sold) by the manufacturer for any monetary value. All requests will be deleted and a forum infraction issued. Making a request such as this is attempting to engage in software piracy and this forum cannot be involved or associated with this activity. The same goes for any private transaction via Private Message. Even if you attempt to engage in this activity in PM's we will still enforce the forum rules. Your PM's are not private and the administration has the right to read them if there's a hint to criminal activity.

    If you are having trouble legally obtaining software please state so. We do not want any hurt feelings when your vague post is mistaken for a free request. It is YOUR responsibility to properly word your request.

    To obtain Motorola software see the Sticky in the Motorola forum.

    The various other vendors often permit their dealers to sell the software online (i.e., Kenwood). Please use Google or some other search engine to find a dealer that sells the software. Typically each series or individual radio requires its own software package. Often the Kenwood software is less than $100 so don't be a cheapskate; just purchase it.

    For M/A Com/Harris/GE, etc: there are two software packages that program all current and past radios. One package is for conventional programming and the other for trunked programming. The trunked package is in upwards of $2,500. The conventional package is more reasonable though is still several hundred dollars. The benefit is you do not need multiple versions for each radio (unlike Motorola).

    This is a large and very visible forum. We cannot jeopardize the ability to provide the RadioReference services by allowing this activity to occur. Please respect this.

I hate tuning CB antennas

mmckenna

I ♥ Ø
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
22,798
Location
Hiding in a coffee shop.
@mmckenna, so I discovered. It looks like a far better method for building an antenna system. It also looks like it is capable of a lot more than just tuning antennas. I'm kind of excited to see what it can do and what I can learn through it.

Thanks again.

Smittie.

I've got an $18,000 version of that at work. The work one is nice, and I can bring it home if needed. For quick/dirty use, the NanoVNA's are hard to beat. The small screen size and clunky interface is its shortfall, however, compared to an SWR meter, it gives you way more information.

I do still carry a directional wattmeter (SWR meter) in my work truck, as well as one in my garage, and they have their uses, but they don't get used quite so often any more. You can really do a lot with those NanoVNA's.

Seems like everyone and their stupid brother decided to make a "how-to" NanoVNA video. There's some real crap on the YouTubes.
 

slowmover

Active Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2020
Messages
1,642
Location
Fort Worth
I've got an $18,000 version of that at work. The work one is nice, and I can bring it home if needed. For quick/dirty use, the NanoVNA's are hard to beat. The small screen size and clunky interface is its shortfall, however, compared to an SWR meter, it gives you way more information.

I do still carry a directional wattmeter (SWR meter) in my work truck, as well as one in my garage, and they have their uses, but they don't get used quite so often any more. You can really do a lot with those NanoVNA's.

Seems like everyone and their stupid brother decided to make a "how-to" NanoVNA video. There's some real crap on the YouTubes.

It’s going to help anyone to also learn what is being measured, and how.

IOW, the theoretical underpinnings.

NanoVNA makes it much easier to demonstrate to one’s self those statements and their parameters with an ARRL overview.

Antennas are big boy stuff.

.
 

smittie

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 5, 2019
Messages
169
Location
Dillon, Montana
NanoVNA makes it much easier to demonstrate to one’s self those statements and their parameters with an ARRL overview.

THIS is the part I am most excited about. The frustrating part of trying to tune an antenna system using only an SWR meter is that the system is a blackbox. When you only have one point of measurement (VSWR) and a lot of contributing components, it is really difficult to get one's head around the interaction of those components. Having a tool that provides much broader feedback in realtime as the various components are manipulated makes it a LOT easier to begin to grasp the interactions. I might even fire up the Galaxy 959 and try playing with SSB.

Yes, I have the ARRL HAM License Manual. Theory is interesting but practical, observable application is invaluable.

I really appreciate the experience, patience and knowledge here. Thank you for contributing to my education.

Gratefully,
Smittie
 

mmckenna

I ♥ Ø
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
22,798
Location
Hiding in a coffee shop.
This isn't from a NanoVNA, this is from an expensive commercial model. But it shows you how easy it is to find the point of resonance (low SWR) for the antenna.

This was years ago when I still had a CB mounted in my old truck. Larsen NMO-27 mounted center of the roof. Nice low SWR in the center:

 

mmckenna

I ♥ Ø
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
22,798
Location
Hiding in a coffee shop.
Here's a zoomed out version looking at everything from 26MHz to 28MHz, easier to see the low SWR dip in the center of the CB band:




Nano VNA will show you the same thing, just a bit less resolution.
 

slowmover

Active Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2020
Messages
1,642
Location
Fort Worth
The video is more in the line of persuasion (as you indicate) than a How To in re the device.

— The worthiness of accurate tuning pays off in multiple ways, IOW.

Short, and gets across main point with examples.

Here’s a vid I earlier linked in re using a NanoVNA to quantify manual tuner set-up (as that device sets last bit for big truck mobile successfully):


Point is: NanoVNA a useful tool to own.

.
 
Last edited:

smittie

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 5, 2019
Messages
169
Location
Dillon, Montana
@slowmover, the video I posted showed me exactly how to do, including all the steps, exactly what I have been struggling to get done well. Other videos indicated that the VNA can also help me understand other aspects of RF and antenna systems.
 

slowmover

Active Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2020
Messages
1,642
Location
Fort Worth
@slowmover, the video I posted showed me exactly how to do, including all the steps, exactly what I have been struggling to get done well. Other videos indicated that the VNA can also help me understand other aspects of RF and antenna systems.

Okay. I watched it before posting that.

There are other vids which go into more detail on its use.

One can get pretty far back into the weeds re antenna tuning. Tail-chasing. I agree that tool sophistication is how to avoid most of that, and that the video is persuasive in that aspect.

.
 

smittie

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 5, 2019
Messages
169
Location
Dillon, Montana
Point is: NanoVNA a useful tool to own.

Yes. I don't have mine yet but from what I've learned thus far, I wish I had this instead of an SWR meter. I understand that SWR meters have their own value but for what I want to accomplish, the NanoVNA is a far more useful tool.

Respectfully,
Smittie
 

smittie

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 5, 2019
Messages
169
Location
Dillon, Montana
Ordered the Larsen NMO30, two 64" whips, and the appropriate spring. Using the NanoVNA I plan to tune it first without the spring, get a snapshot of the curve and then retune with the spring in place in order to compare the difference. The assumption is that the coils of the spring broaden the bandwidth, or so I've been told.
 

smittie

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 5, 2019
Messages
169
Location
Dillon, Montana
Got an antenna working and was finally able to get a radio check with a driver about 4 miles away.
The Cobra 25 has a "Dyna Mike" knob and I currently have an Astatic mic on the radio. The responder had a hard time understanding me until I turned the Dyna Mic all the way up.
Is there a proper use of this gadget?
Is the Astatic a decent mic or should I go back to stock?

The edumacation continues.
 

smittie

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 5, 2019
Messages
169
Location
Dillon, Montana
So, I bought the Larsen NMO30 and the 64" whip. Got it tuned to 1.1 SWR using the NanoVNA and verified using an SWR meter. And then the center tab broke off.
All done with Larsen. Back to Laird products.
 

K6GBW

Member
Joined
May 29, 2016
Messages
361
Location
Montebello, CA
Wow, I'm really surprised by that. I've had great luck with Larsen in the past. Any chance it's a manufacturers defect? I'm wondering if it's replaceable under warranty.
 

smittie

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 5, 2019
Messages
169
Location
Dillon, Montana
I have two Larsen antennas and they both use the bent metal tab for the center contact. Laird, Tram and Browning (Tram/Browning) use a spring loaded brass/copper plunger for the center contact. Better construction.
I am going to contact Antenna Farm and talk to them about it. I would prefer a refund or store credit to a replacement. I just not very impressed with Larsen quality.
 

K6GBW

Member
Joined
May 29, 2016
Messages
361
Location
Montebello, CA
I get it. Getting burned leaves a bad after taste. Laird used to make a CB27 antenna. I'm not sure if it's still made but they're probably still available online somewhere. Where did you end up mounting it?
 

smittie

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 5, 2019
Messages
169
Location
Dillon, Montana
I get it. Getting burned leaves a bad after taste. Laird used to make a CB27 antenna. I'm not sure if it's still made but they're probably still available online somewhere. Where did you end up mounting it?

The CB27 is still made. I have a couple of them.
Mounted it use the Rugged Ridge bracket but that seems to be a problem. The Lairds show very poorly (1.8 SWR) on that mount and I think it is because the CB27 requires a DC ground and the Rugged Ridge mount against the plastic body parts probably does not provide enough through the single bolt.
I am considering moving the CB antenna to the steel bumper. The VHF/UHF antenna appears to be fine on the Rugged Ridge bracket.

Comments, suggestions and criticisms welcome.

Gladiator w Rugged Ridge Antenna Mount.jpg
 
Last edited:

prcguy

Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2006
Messages
14,743
Location
So Cal - Richardson, TX - Tewksbury, MA
I've got an $18,000 version of that at work. The work one is nice, and I can bring it home if needed. For quick/dirty use, the NanoVNA's are hard to beat. The small screen size and clunky interface is its shortfall, however, compared to an SWR meter, it gives you way more information.

I do still carry a directional wattmeter (SWR meter) in my work truck, as well as one in my garage, and they have their uses, but they don't get used quite so often any more. You can really do a lot with those NanoVNA's.

Seems like everyone and their stupid brother decided to make a "how-to" NanoVNA video. There's some real crap on the YouTubes.
So, you got a wee little one at work. When I go on consulting jobs I'm handed a 32GHz Agilent Field Fox with all options that runs north of $100k. I've used it to measure and tweak my CB and hamster antennas which is a little silly but it sure gets the job done. Problem with using this level of equipment is it costs hundreds of $$ in adapters to get down to PL-259s.

KeysightN9950A-Main-image.jpg
 
Top