**RT System**Can you elaborate how the radio feels cheap? I’m close to buying and would like to hear about the RY systems bugs as well. Thanks.
**RT System**Can you elaborate how the radio feels cheap? I’m close to buying and would like to hear about the RY systems bugs as well. Thanks.
Have you contacted RT systems to see if your doing something wrong or its a known bug? 1st gen software is usually buggy until updates come out. Your the only person I have read that complains about it that bad.If I handle the r-15 and the r-30 and or the ID 52, it weighs less, the knobs and buttons do not work as smoothly as my other Icom radiOS. The RT software does not copy and paste changes the same as other programs. Example I wanted to change one frequency category icon and it changes all the icons in the same Group. Done with it, will be going up for sale.
Yes, contacted RTSystems. I have used their support many times with good results, not this time. Very rude and condescending. I have 11 RTSystems programs for all the radios I have. This was a terrible experience.Have you contacted RT systems to see if your doing something wrong or its a known bug? 1st gen software is usually buggy until updates come out. Your the only person I have read that complains about it that bad.
I put a Diamond SRH77CA on the IC-R15 to test it out. Much better than the stock antenna.The stock antenna is good for UHF mil Air from what I hear. for me, for VHF air, the Smiley Antenna 6" rubber duck is magic, the 125 to 132 Mhz variety.
I find the Comet wrx-1000 telescoping antenna works pretty well at around 21 inches for Civ Air.I have spent years and many$$ experimenting with handheld antennas(many are in a drawer not being used) and if there is no issue as far as height, for most reception especially below 500 mhz a simple adjustable collapsable antenna like the diamond rh-789 adjusted to the frequency being listened to has always been equal to or better than any other rubber duck. Yes, people will argue there is no gain ete etc but supposed gain antennas never made any listenable difference in comparison to the collapsables. Gain can be a factor in rooftop yagis and directional antennas but companies claiming ridiculous gain for handheld receiving antennas is ”smoke and mirrors”. A handheld antenna at the specific resonating frequency always works equal to or better…yes there are handheld duck antennas that are ‘tuned’ to the range of frequencies but again they cannot receive any better than a collapsable. We cannot argue with physics!
Look at all the money I could have saved!
From the ARRL antenna handbook….
“The salient point here is that the more capture area you have, the stronger your received signal will be. All other things being equal, it’s fair to say that the longer the antenna, the better it receives. This is consistent with the concept of Total Copper (or aluminum) Content (TCC) as a yardstick of overall Amateur Radio station performance. The more copper (or aluminum) you have in the air the better you’ll talk and the better you’ll hear!”
Having said all this, I realize there is a convenience factor for using smaller antennas and I use them on my handhelds all the time…but if I need that extra edge, I use the collapsable set to the frequency.
There is one on eBay bidding at 375 to start and saw one here on RR classifieds the other day, there are several on eBay out of Japan but would need to mod for full USA vhf air , mod can be found on *I think iirc* hamlifeWhy can't I find it on Amazon or eBay now?
R15 mod on hamlife full page, use translateJapanese version vhf air mod…. R15 mod
There are a few gaps above 253 on the Japanese version, 118-137 is the same us/jp. The same for jp ver of others ; R20, R30 are listed on that site and amebloI was looking at the IC-R15 specs on Icom Japan and noticed the specs for VHF air is 108 to 253Mhz. Unless I am missing something, what does this mod do for VHF air, I thought 118 to137Mhz is covered by this scanner.