n5ims
Member
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2004
- Messages
- 3,993
Some interesting reading on the issues and delays on the new Harris P-25 Phase II system for The Metrocrest Quad Cities Public Safety Radio System (Metrocrest Quad Cities Public Safety Radio System Trunking System, Carrollton, Texas - Scanner Frequencies).
(11/04/2015 meeting minutes) http://www.ntecc.org/DocumentCenter/View/80
(12/3/2015 meeting minutes) http://www.ntecc.org/DocumentCenter/View/79
(11/04/2015 meeting minutes) http://www.ntecc.org/DocumentCenter/View/80
Leonard Martin has had discussions with Harris regarding the delays that the cities are experiencing. He feels that the cities should each get a report from their respective finance departments to find out exactly what these delays are costing the cities. Mr. Martin also expressed that he is not opposed to going to court, if it comes to that, because this is costing so much money. He has also informed Harris that Carrollton is not paying another dime towards this project. Mr. Greer stated that these delays cannot go on any longer and that this is embarrassing.
...
A line needs to be drawn, and NTECC needs a target that gives us a solution with a plan. Mr. Phillips suggests that each manager get a report together and get the information to Mr. Ecker, to compile a letter to Harris. Mr. Daniels suggests that the cities agree that if one city doesn’t pay a portion of the contract, the other cities shouldn’t either. Mr. Phillips agreed that each city should report to their respective accounting department that no more payments should be made to Harris until something is done about this.
(12/3/2015 meeting minutes) http://www.ntecc.org/DocumentCenter/View/79
Mr. Leonard detailed the group’s concerns with him, stating that Harris’ reputation is at risk of being damaged, the implementation team has shown a lack of urgency and communication is very weak and inconsistent. Mr. Martin went on to tell Mr. Young that $30,000 per month is being spent on a facility that is not being used because of these delays, in addition to other costs and this is unacceptable. Ms. Mitchell of City of Carrollton stated that Mr. Young sounded surprised to hear of the difficulties that NTECC has been experiencing.
...
Mr. Greer is most concerned because of the fact that there are still damages and suggests that payment be withheld until everything is settled. The letter Mr. Laughlin drafted does detail the financial damages the cities have experienced, however he suggests concessions could take place for future services, instead of trying to get restitution for the past. The relationship with Harris, as the vendor will still need to be solid because of future service requirements that the center will have and salvaging that relationship will be important. Mr. Martin feels that Harris will not take us to court if the cities withheld payment.
Last edited: