The big difference is in the types of systems - simulcast versus a single site system.
I'm assuming you are listening to the Indiana SAFE-T system. In that system you may be receiving several sites, but each site uses a separate set of frequencies. So you may hear the Floyds Knobs site transmitting on 851.400 and the Henryville site transmitting on 851.425.
The MetroSafe system is a simulcast system. That simulcast system has 13 or so sites around Louisville Metro all of which use the same set of frequencies.
With the MetroSafe system you may be receiving 856.2125 coming from the Meidinger building, 856.2125 coming from the Bardstown Road site and 856.2125 coming from the Utica site all at once. Your scanner is having trouble differentiating which of these signals its wants to decode, so you'll get distorted sound as a result of this overlapping of multiple site reception.
Thus, for lack of better wording, in a simulcast system pulling in just one site is the key. This can be achieved by attenuating the site, or using a different antenna setup (I've seen pictures where someone used a section of a paperclip for an antenna to improve simulcast system audio). It does defy logic, but simulcast systems are whole new things. . .
Nice setup - was that a home-made bracket?
I'm assuming you are listening to the Indiana SAFE-T system. In that system you may be receiving several sites, but each site uses a separate set of frequencies. So you may hear the Floyds Knobs site transmitting on 851.400 and the Henryville site transmitting on 851.425.
The MetroSafe system is a simulcast system. That simulcast system has 13 or so sites around Louisville Metro all of which use the same set of frequencies.
With the MetroSafe system you may be receiving 856.2125 coming from the Meidinger building, 856.2125 coming from the Bardstown Road site and 856.2125 coming from the Utica site all at once. Your scanner is having trouble differentiating which of these signals its wants to decode, so you'll get distorted sound as a result of this overlapping of multiple site reception.
Thus, for lack of better wording, in a simulcast system pulling in just one site is the key. This can be achieved by attenuating the site, or using a different antenna setup (I've seen pictures where someone used a section of a paperclip for an antenna to improve simulcast system audio). It does defy logic, but simulcast systems are whole new things. . .
Nice setup - was that a home-made bracket?
Last edited: