Dick33
Member
My computer on procom96 shows the system nac as 5f6 but my psr500 scanner shows it as 5f9? Wondering why?
That is a bug with the PSR500 mine does the same, but it shows the correct system number when it alternates screens.
My computer on procom96 shows the system nac as 5f6 but my psr500 scanner shows it as 5f9? Wondering why?
the P25 system sure is clear sounds great
i am using my 536hp and 436hp right now
Um, it's not Broken Sky, that is why it sounds good.
Broken / OpenSky does not sound that bad as they make it out to be. . Listening to the patching of OS to the 700 MHZ P25 test system, it actually sounds pretty good, you really get a sense of what OS sound like. yes you do have those hanging jittery ending of the odd transmission, not as many repeats as you would think there would be.There's going to be a huge learning curve when people don't have to repee-e-e-e-e-e-e-e-a-a-a-a-*
Sorry.I mean, don't have to repeat themselves 47 times because they "went digital". The coverage from even the small handful of towers that were active when I was in town at the start of the month seemed great.. hard to have anyone on the fringes the way it's been laid out.
Productivity is going to go up because officers won't be spending excessive amounts of time trying to get their radios to work.
Broken / OpenSky does not sound that bad as they make it out to be. . Listening to the patching of OS to the 700 MHZ P25 test system, it actually sounds pretty good, you really get a sense of what OS sound like. yes you do have those hanging jittery ending of the odd transmission, not as many repeats as you would think there would be.
Broken / OpenSky does not sound that bad as they make it out to be. . Listening to the patching of OS to the 700 MHZ P25 test system, it actually sounds pretty good, you really get a sense of what OS sound like. yes you do have those hanging jittery ending of the odd transmission, not as many repeats as you would think there would be.
It's taken 6+ years, millions of dollars over the original cost, and numerous software updates to get to this subpar level. By now, it should be five nines perfect.
Two-and-a-half years ago, while listening to the patches to the old VHF I was surprised they managed to get much done. It seemed like every fourth or fifth voice call needed a partial or full repeat because the traffic broke into that nonsensical "da da da da", OR the transmission (for lack of better words) slurred at various points just enough to make it useless. The slurring wound like "Copy 467 on Nevada sluuurrrr six john adam baker, blue (whatever vehicle) Spring Mountain sluuurrr ound, East of Raislurrrow"
I honestly don't know the procedures and mental acuity of police dispatchers, but watching other types of dispatch, I get the impression that they learn to very quickly to type in each letter as being said phonetically and develop a very efficient flow that gets disrupted when they have to stop and 'think' about what they heard. I'm also guessing that each officer began to incorporate this unreliability into their process by delaying their next step in case they had to retransmit everything again.