• To anyone looking to acquire commercial radio programming software:

    Please do not make requests for copies of radio programming software which is sold (or was sold) by the manufacturer for any monetary value. All requests will be deleted and a forum infraction issued. Making a request such as this is attempting to engage in software piracy and this forum cannot be involved or associated with this activity. The same goes for any private transaction via Private Message. Even if you attempt to engage in this activity in PM's we will still enforce the forum rules. Your PM's are not private and the administration has the right to read them if there's a hint to criminal activity.

    If you are having trouble legally obtaining software please state so. We do not want any hurt feelings when your vague post is mistaken for a free request. It is YOUR responsibility to properly word your request.

    To obtain Motorola software see the Sticky in the Motorola forum.

    The various other vendors often permit their dealers to sell the software online (i.e., Kenwood). Please use Google or some other search engine to find a dealer that sells the software. Typically each series or individual radio requires its own software package. Often the Kenwood software is less than $100 so don't be a cheapskate; just purchase it.

    For M/A Com/Harris/GE, etc: there are two software packages that program all current and past radios. One package is for conventional programming and the other for trunked programming. The trunked package is in upwards of $2,500. The conventional package is more reasonable though is still several hundred dollars. The benefit is you do not need multiple versions for each radio (unlike Motorola).

    This is a large and very visible forum. We cannot jeopardize the ability to provide the RadioReference services by allowing this activity to occur. Please respect this.

Motorola NAS tips?

Omie09

Member
Joined
Sep 2, 2024
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
I have an XTS5000, and I recently set up NAS. It doesn’t affiliate at all. However, I am having trouble hearing transmissions and the radio is missing them. I’m unsure what the issue is but I feel like I may have possibly messed up the band plan. Any tips to stop missing transmission? (Monitoring Starcom21)
 

Omie09

Member
Joined
Sep 2, 2024
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
Confirm your 700 bandplan element. This may not be it, but if it works on 800 it's worth a try.
1742696879903.png
1742696904192.png
I have my band plan set up this way to monitor Dupage county. I don't have RR plus or whatever so I cannot see bandplan info on here but I pulled it from another site. Not too sure how old it is, or if the bandplan of Starcom has updated...
 

Asunakiyori

Lurker
Joined
May 2, 2024
Messages
299
Reaction score
114
Location
Hiding in a Shed somewhere
View attachment 180511
View attachment 180512
I have my band plan set up this way to monitor Dupage county. I don't have RR plus or whatever so I cannot see bandplan info on here but I pulled it from another site. Not too sure how old it is, or if the bandplan of Starcom has updated...

that 450 seems out of place on a 7/800 radio...
 
Last edited:

chrismol1

Active Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2008
Messages
1,415
Reaction score
1,341
Really? I heard that TX Inhibit will not allow any sort transmission as a feature for hazmat situations or something of the sort.
That's right. It's been specified in the user manuals for a long time now. This is also an additonal step to lock down a NAS radio. A radio on a selected talkgroup on a P25 9600 Phase 1/2 trunked system needs to register/affiliate before passing traffic. But that only applies to authorized radios, using a NAS radio of course does not need to affiliate to pass traffic, in proper NAS programming, it should not require this but indeed many users including yourself and myself, enable it as peace of mind. and especially helpful for very bad wrong setup of NAS where someone does not change the designated tx member in the scan list to Selected Chan and leaves it on talkback, risking rouge transmissions.


txinhibit.PNG



As said in previous post, the old TX Inhibit Method of NAS on old 3600 analog trunked system, you could select a trunked talkgroup while set to TX inhibit and still receive traffic, only works with older models, MTS2000, Jedi etc era radios and also when there was the Affiliate on PTT feature. The succeding models cannot as it's a function of the firmware to automatically affiliate.
 
Last edited:

chrismol1

Active Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2008
Messages
1,415
Reaction score
1,341
I don't know what's up with the 450 either, probably somebody copying another trunked system bandplan line by line when the default boxes could be checked off for everything from VHF to 900. But it doesn't matter as this radios 700/800 and the bandplan only matters in this case of this XTS, the 700 FDMA. The rest can be ignored and will be as the current codeplug only has Channel ID Number 2 for the 700 FDMA channel ID/bandplan selection in the control channel page.

Problem solved. Changed trunking system search time to 255 and digital modulator to CQPSK. However, encountering a new issue. When receiving specific talkgroups, Fail 001 will appear, but all other talkgroups and trunking systems work perfectly. Does this mean there is something wrong with tuning, programming error or simply p25 phase 2 in use?
I have been perfectly with talk groups in Will county. This issue is fail 001 while trying to monitor Starcom in Dupage county. As far as I know I have set up the trunking system and scan the same way and I was asking for a solution or answer.
Have you scanned conventionally and confirmed you can receive the dupage transmission on the XTS in FDMA?

From memory, my XTS completely ignores TDMA channel assignments. My guess is the bandplan is wrong, like maybe for 700 MHz. Does the site in question use 700 MHz?
If I recall, there was a change in later XTS/XTL firmware to ignore TDMA during scan as the control channel would send out a talkgroup channel grant but of course the XTS/XTL doesn't do Phase 2.

If the bandplans are the same for both sites OP has programmed, I wonder if that could be the case. DuPage county has much more TDMA talkgroups than Will County. If the XTS has older firmware and those talkgroups are indeed TDMA, the FAIL 001 might be what is being seen.
 

GTR8000

NY/NJ Database Guy
Database Admin
Joined
Oct 4, 2007
Messages
16,754
Reaction score
15,745
Location
BEE00
As said in previous post, the old TX Inhibit Method of NAS on old 3600 analog trunked system, you could select a trunked talkgroup while set to TX inhibit and still receive traffic, only works with older models, MTS2000, Jedi etc era radios and also when there was the Affiliate on PTT feature. The succeding models cannot as it's a function of the firmware to automatically affiliate.
Worked just fine with ASTRO 25 and APX models. Don't want to stray too far off topic, but I monitored a 3600 system for years with an APX in TX Inhibit mode and it never once tried to affiliate, while passing both analog and P25 audio without issue. Anyway, back on topic....
 

Omie09

Member
Joined
Sep 2, 2024
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
Have you scanned conventionally and confirmed you can receive the dupage transmission on the XTS in FDMA?
I have tried with a Kenwood that would allow some traffic to go through but then get stuck on a random channel with no audio because I live very close to a bunch of office buildings with security, fire, and all sorts of transmitters. I shall try with the Motorola.

If I recall, there was a change in later XTS/XTL firmware to ignore TDMA during scan as the control channel would send out a talkgroup channel grant but of course the XTS/XTL doesn't do Phase 2.
Host version: 20.50.05
DSP version: 19.50.01
 

Omie09

Member
Joined
Sep 2, 2024
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
I have conducted my own experiment and have results. I added a TDMA talkgroup into the NAS in the XTS5000. I also monitored the talkgroup using broadcastify and when the talkgroup was in DDM I could hear on the XTS but when it was full TDMA, there was no fail 001 on radio. This means the fail 001 is not caused by TDMA. Based on what others have said, now it comes down to bandplan or hardware. The hardware answer doesn't make full sense to me though because I am able to listen to everything in Will county, even 700mhz sites of Starcom for WESCOM.
 

Omie09

Member
Joined
Sep 2, 2024
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
Something very odd has happened. I was adding more talk groups into the radio, and when I went to scan, the previously troublesome talk groups had sprung to life. No more fail 001. The fail 001 spread to a different talk group so here I am again.
 

Asunakiyori

Lurker
Joined
May 2, 2024
Messages
299
Reaction score
114
Location
Hiding in a Shed somewhere
Something very odd has happened. I was adding more talk groups into the radio, and when I went to scan, the previously troublesome talk groups had sprung to life. No more fail 001. The fail 001 spread to a different talk group so here I am again.
If the system can operate in a TDMA/FDMA set up.. it possible they are moving some TG's to a phase 2 operation but if theres a phase 1 subscriber, it drops back to FDMA while that subscriber is active since the XTS5000 cannot.. will not.. will never do TDMA

of course i could be wrong
 

Omie09

Member
Joined
Sep 2, 2024
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
If the system can operate in a TDMA/FDMA set up.. it possible they are moving some TG's to a phase 2 operation but if theres a phase 1 subscriber, it drops back to FDMA while that subscriber is active since the XTS5000 cannot.. will not.. will never do TDMA

of course i could be wrong
I do know that the talk groups do this however my radio will stay silent when TDMA transmissions are occurring, tested with broadcastify and my radio. I have no clue what I did but I guess I can only investigate more.
 

KE4ZNR

Radio Geek
Joined
Jan 21, 2002
Messages
7,537
Reaction score
1,276
Location
Raleigh, NC
If the system can operate in a TDMA/FDMA set up.. it possible they are moving some TG's to a phase 2 operation but if theres a phase 1 subscriber, it drops back to FDMA while that subscriber is active since the XTS5000 cannot.. will not.. will never do TDMA

of course i could be wrong

It's called Dynamic Dual Mode (DDM). Not every TDMA system uses it.
 

Anderegg

Enter text in this field
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Mar 7, 2010
Messages
2,701
Reaction score
499
Location
San Diego
That's right. It's been specified in the user manuals for a long time now. This is also an additonal step to lock down a NAS radio. A radio on a selected talkgroup on a P25 9600 Phase 1/2 trunked system needs to register/affiliate before passing traffic. But that only applies to authorized radios, using a NAS radio of course does not need to affiliate to pass traffic, in proper NAS programming, it should not require this but indeed many users including yourself and myself, enable it as peace of mind. and especially helpful for very bad wrong setup of NAS where someone does not change the designated tx member in the scan list to Selected Chan and leaves it on talkback, risking rouge transmissions.


View attachment 180519



As said in previous post, the old TX Inhibit Method of NAS on old 3600 analog trunked system, you could select a trunked talkgroup while set to TX inhibit and still receive traffic, only works with older models, MTS2000, Jedi etc era radios and also when there was the Affiliate on PTT feature. The succeding models cannot as it's a function of the firmware to automatically affiliate.

A use case scenario for trunking personality "scan list inhibit", would be if you had an APX7000/8000 and wanted to utilize the UHF and VHF bands for conventional simplex and repeaters while still allowing 7/800 NAS operation without slaving the entire radio into TX INHIB mode.
 
Top