I checked the previous mentioned locations, along with data from Sites 7, 14, 16, 23, 28, 29, 31, 39 and so far, nothing has shown up. I'm thinking it might be somewhere near the Delaware River, kinda like how Sites 36, 37 and 38 are set up. (?)
The previous control channel for Site 21 was 773.60625 (7TAC72), now 774.60625 (7TAC74). Both of those are nationwide interop frequencies, and both are licensed under the site's waiver to use them for the mobile site under WQQS714.
I don't think it's a fixed site. Has anyone ever confirmed the mobile Site ID in the past?
I always had the mobile site as Site 40. Not saying that's absolutely definitively correct, but that's what I had it nailed down as.
Question based on your hypothesis though GTR. Just playing devil's advocate here. If it is not a fixed site, is it possible they're now using a mobile site for basic range or feasibility testing before erecting a permanent site in an area?
Im trying to program a unication g5 for MONOC and having issues. On the site numbers in the database, do I use the one's int the ( ) or the regular one. The pager says it is out of range on all the sites.
Had you actually decoded the mobile site in action at some point? I didn't think that anyone had actually caught it on the air, since the RFSS/Site in the database was just a placeholder and no one had ever submitted updated data to correct it.
There's very good modeling software that is used for that purpose, but never say never. Technically the state is permitted to also use those nationwide interop frequencies for a temporary fixed site (in addition to the mobile site), although there are restrictions on height of transmit antenna, power output, etc.
I could certainly be wrong about Site 21 being a mobile site, but that's okay, that's part of the fun of figuring this stuff out. It's just odd that within the past few weeks, the adjacent site list for Site 21 has changed drastically, it's using those interop frequencies that are intended for the mobile site, and no one seems to be able to get a lock on the Site 21 control channel, wherever it might be.
Sorry, Scott...I'm always making more work for you!
If he hasn't strangled me yet for submitting corrections to typos, grammar, and never ending municipal changes, I think you're good.
Imagine if an NJICS Engineer came on here and just told us everything. That would be too easy.