AtomicTaco
Member
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2007
- Messages
- 246
I know you're in Everett but I don't know enough about the Snoho system to describe it accurately, but the same principles apply.Maybe a stupid question, but can you please further explain simulcast and site? I want to ensure that I understand the context of what you are saying.
A site is a group of repeaters acting together. It has a control channel that is different from all other sites in the same system. One repeater sends out the control channel data and receives requests from radios. Other repeaters repeat the voice channel(s).
Simulcasts work the same way, except multiple repeaters repeat the traffic at different locations. King County operates probably the best simlcast coverage for King County (The KC system is jointly owned by KC, ESPCA, and the City of Seattle. Valley Communications is in there too, but KC does VC's radio work). If a user is within range of the KC portion of the system (and their radio is set to use that system before other systems, more on this in a bit) and they key up and start talking, you'll hear their voice come off the tower at Station 63 in Federal Way, Station 73 in Kent, and all the other sites. Basically the multiple physical sites act as one site.
When setting up a radio, they can be configured to always stay on one control channel, or to prefer a certain control channel. For example, Tukwila units are on the King County system 99.9% of the time, but it's possible that the Seattle control channel might come in slightly better in a particular location. The radio is set up to not roam onto the Seattle simulcast unless it absolutely has to, or in some cases not at all. And yes, Seattle does send a bill to King County requesting money for airtime. There are a few more details that I haven't covered, if you're super interested we can go into more detail. Not that it'll help with the Snohomish system