PSR-500 and PSR-600 Pre Release

Status
Not open for further replies.

WayneH

Forums Veteran
Super Moderator
Joined
Dec 16, 2000
Messages
7,545
Location
Your master site
pappy1 said:
Whatr is MPT 1327 Trunking?
Check out the RR Wiki here. Tons of info on the Forums search and also Google.

Simply, it's a digital trunking format utilizing digital voice TDMA'd on a traffic channel to produce multiple conversations. It's used heavily outside of the US.
 
Last edited:

slicerwizard

Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2002
Messages
7,772
Location
Toronto, Ontario
wayne_h said:
Check out the RR Wiki here. Tons of info on the Forums search and also Google.

Simply, it's a digital trunking format utilizing digital voice TDMA'd on a traffic channel to produce multiple conversations. It's used heavily outside of the US.
I thought it was trunking system with a 1200 bps (IIRC) control channel and mainly analog voice channels?
 

b52hbuff

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
1,738
wolter said:
This godsend comes immediately to mind.

It isn't controlled by the authoritarian Joe M, mch, Voyager, NCC74656_USS_Voyager, or whatever screen name he chooses to go by at that particular moment. I'd say that is a DEFINITE advantage! One worth cheering about, even...!

Wow if this isn't the pot calling the kettle black.

I will say that I've never had a problem with any of the list Joe has run.
 

wolter

Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
283
b52hbuff said:
Wow if this isn't the pot calling the kettle black.
There are numerous messages in his forums that suggest otherwise. But, we are not going to get into that here because it has nothing to do with the subject of this thread. Contact me privately if you wish to continue.
 
Last edited:

loumaag

Silent Key - Aug 2014
Joined
Oct 20, 2002
Messages
12,935
Location
Katy, TX
First:
wolter said:
b52hbuff said:
Wow if this isn't the pot calling the kettle black.
What is that supposed to mean? And what on earth does it have to do with the subject of this thread, the PSR-500 & 600...? Focus on the subject.
Then Edited version:
Wolter said:
There are numerous messages in his forums that suggest otherwise. But, we are not going to get into that here because it has nothing to do with the subject of this thread. Contact me privately if you wish to continue.
Please take your own advice and stick to the subject at hand, which is not an opinion of others, but rather the PSR-500 & 600. Further diversions from the subject at hand (by anyone) will be summarily removed without comment.
 

KB4REA

Radio Aficionado
Joined
Jun 28, 2005
Messages
376
Location
FL - St. Johns Co.
safetyobc said:
It would be nice to see a quality belt clip that could be completely removed, leaving little or no parts sticking out on the back. That would be great for everyone.
bc780l said:
(I'd be much happier, for example, if my 396 didn't have that mount on it!).
If you're not aware, I have the 330T and was able to remove completely the belt clip and it's mounting piece off the back of the scanner. Makes it real thin. Like you say, it is great for everyone, just don't lose the screw like I almost did.

If Gre could implement something similar that'd be great. I have a feeling not this time around.

BTW, great idea, Matt, about clipping the scanner to the sun visor in the car. Didn't think of that. :)
 

iMONITOR

Silent Key
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Sep 20, 2006
Messages
11,156
Location
S.E. Michigan
Brewkelyn said:
If you're not aware, I have the 330T and was able to remove completely the belt clip and it's mounting piece off the back of the scanner. Makes it real thin. Like you say, it is great for everyone, just don't lose the screw like I almost did.

If Gre could implement something similar that'd be great. I have a feeling not this time around.


The belt clip is easy to remove from GRE's PRO-96. Just two small screws. This leaves it almost flat on the back.
 

Wayne

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
142
TGID decode?

While the specs certainly look impressive for the PSR600, I have seen no mention as to whether it can decode conventional P25 talk groups. As there are 4096 possible NAC's, there are also 65535 possible talk group id's...

Wayne
 

b52hbuff

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
1,738
Any idea if it retains reverse tone decode?

Even though I'm a big Uniden fan, this feature certainly does make monitoring much more enjoyable....
 

Wayne

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
142
emt331000 said:
What do you mean by "conventional P25 talk groups"?

The P25 standard calls for many more voice/data options than analog. The default talk group ID for most radio manufacturer's is 0001. However, a programmer has the option of programming a unique 4 didgit TGID using 0-9 and A-F (thus 65535 possible combinations) to separate traffic on the same frequency using the same NAC but different talk group id's. For instance, a user could be licensed for one frequency but require say five "channels". So, the following scheme could be utilized;

Ch 1, 464.550, NAC 001, TGID 12AF
Ch 2, 464.550, NAC 001, TGID 6D3F
Ch 3, 464.550, NAC 001, TGID BEAF
Ch 4, 464.550, NAC 001, TGID 1234
Ch 5, 464.550, NAC 001, TGID ABCD

If the scanner you had could decode NAC's but not TGID's, you would hear all the traffic for channels 1-5 at the same time and have no way to "filter" or separate the individual channels as set up above.

Wayne
 

loumaag

Silent Key - Aug 2014
Joined
Oct 20, 2002
Messages
12,935
Location
Katy, TX
Wayne said:
The P25 standard calls for many more voice/data options than analog. The default talk group ID for most radio manufacturer's is 0001. However, a programmer has the option of programming a unique 4 didgit TGID using 0-9 and A-F (thus 65535 possible combinations) to separate traffic on the same frequency using the same NAC but different talk group id's. For instance, a user could be licensed for one frequency but require say five "channels". So, the following scheme could be utilized;

Ch 1, 464.550, NAC 001, TGID 12AF
Ch 2, 464.550, NAC 001, TGID 6D3F
Ch 3, 464.550, NAC 001, TGID BEAF
Ch 4, 464.550, NAC 001, TGID 1234
Ch 5, 464.550, NAC 001, TGID ABCD

If the scanner you had could decode NAC's but not TGID's, you would hear all the traffic for channels 1-5 at the same time and have no way to "filter" or separate the individual channels as set up above.

Wayne
Just to expand on the above, while that is true, it is not quite the same as TG's on a trunked system. In the above scenario, only one TG at a time can occupy the channel because obviously there is only one frequency. So although you would hear all the channels on your scanner (assuming no TG ability) you will not hear "all the traffic for channels 1-5 at the same time" as only one "channel" can occupy the frequency at a time.
 

WayneH

Forums Veteran
Super Moderator
Joined
Dec 16, 2000
Messages
7,545
Location
Your master site
Conventional P25 talkgroups are used very rarely in most normal radio communications. There may be a few amateur radio enthusiasts who use it, which would fall in the very small minority of users of TGs, so it really doesn't generate the need.....yet.

From what I've monitored with a Service Monitor on Public Safety and Federal radio I have seen zero use of the TG option.
 

yaesumofo

Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2003
Messages
314
Location
los Angeles
Same here, I was also hoping for an expandable memory system. a trans flash slot would do nicely. that combined with the dual receivers would allow for the ability to record one channel/talk group/or trunked system while monitoring another.
What about diversity reception....this would be great for the hand held user while mobile...

They could have done so much more.. I guess we will have to look to Uniden for some of these features. Now that uniden has fired their shot, and the standard has been set so low, I have a funny feeling that uniden will NOT be forced to work that hard to best this radio. Too Bad for all of us.
Yaesumofo

Peter said:
Nice evolution of the existing Pro96.

I'll probably buy one when it comes out.... but I'm not nearly as excited as most of the folks who seem to be posting. I was hoping for REVOLUTION not EVOLUTION. I was hoping for dual-receive (for TG prioritization for one system or receiving two separate channels simultaneously), MUCH smaller form factor for the handheld along with waterproof construction, and MUCH larger display and detachable faceplate for the mobile. And we don't really know about either the sensitivity or (just as important) the selectivity, do we?

If you ask me, the scanner folks need to start thinking outside the "scanner" box, look at what's going on in the ham xceiver markets (AT LEAST), and get with some serious innovative engineering.

One plus... better than no new radio. But... ho hum for me... What is it that I'm missing?

de Peter K1PGV
 

emt331000

Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2007
Messages
48
yaesumofo said:
They could have done so much more.. I guess we will have to look to Uniden for some of these features. Now that uniden has fired their shot, and the standard has been set so low, I have a funny feeling that uniden will NOT be forced to work that hard to best this radio. Too Bad for all of us.
Yaesumofo
Except for how Uniden motorboats on P25. I'm looking forward to these GRE models simply for that reason.
 

Quint6

Member
Joined
Apr 3, 2005
Messages
154
backlight

Does the
GRE 500/600 have different color back lights like the Uniden 996 that has Green & Red
it would be cool if the 500/600 have a choice of
Blue/Green/Red would awesome
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top