mdmonitor
Member
That's insane (to me at least), using aggressors to perform air defense on any kind of routine basis.
I agree that using F-22's all of the time for it is a waste of resources (F-15s are a better fit)..., but aggressors?
Yes, I get that it is a secondary mission, but (as a comparison) Luke AFB fighter instructors and F-16's could be used for air defense as a secondary mission (at least in the past), in reality, if it has to be done though, things are worse than they appear.
I understand the reasoning, but it smells like scrapping the bottom of the barrel, and just concerns me.
Thanks
Joel
Joel,
I agree. Especially since Eielson is a Fairbanks which is a fair distance away from the Bering Straits. Scramble fro Eielson would take more time than using the F-22s at Elmendorf.