mmckenna
I ♥ Ø
Agreed. I memorized the Extra exam and aced it, but it means nothing about my radio knowledge. I'll readily admit that I did what I had to do to pass so I could operate in a particular part of the band. There are many techs that know way more than me, I'm sure.
Years ago my wife did a "ham cram" session. Walked in with zero understanding of radio, walked out with the tech license and still zero understanding of radio.
An individuals license class means nothing to me. Actually, when someone starts throwing their license class around, I usually think a bit less of them. The paper means nothing. Their ability/skill is what matters.
I still think testing is a way for people to prove they have the knowledge and skills. For some of my previous certifications, there were skill-based exams (not written), similar to a private pilot checkride or a driver's license test. You may have it in your head, but if you can't perform, you don't get the upgrade.
I've done a lot of training throughout my career. I've got a lot of pieces of paper that say I'm certified/trained/licensed/qualified, but often unless I use those skills, I get rusty and forget a lot of it. Somewhere I've got Cisco training certificates, and I'll be danged if I can remember any of it.
What I do have is the basic knowledge to know when to stop what I'm doing and either refresh my memory, or ask someone with more knowledge for assistance.
When I hire new staff, I usually ignore the long list of acronyms and certifications on the bottom of the resume. It's more important to know what they are actually passionate about, what they really know well, and what they really love about the job.
Other than bragging rights, the license class doesn't mean a lot. Yeah, you get some extra slices of spectrum, but we've all seen what happens with those. I'm not impressed with what I've heard.