Just a quick update, There are ZERO Raspberry PI 4's available anyplace. If you find them, the costs have almost quadrupled since we developed this device.Thanks for the clarification and status update.
Robert
Just a quick update, There are ZERO Raspberry PI 4's available anyplace. If you find them, the costs have almost quadrupled since we developed this device.Thanks for the clarification and status update.
Well, that is the 8GB model. I don't know what size is used for the remote head. But yeah, I think the days of cheap electronics may be over. Regardless, I STILL want a remote head for my SDS100.
I tried to order one of these, as it said, "NOW SHIPPING!"...
View attachment 123273
... but it then came up with...
View attachment 123274
... kind of confusing. I guess I'm on a list, but have no idea where I am on that list or or how long it'll be before my time arrives.
I'll be honest, I haven't been following this thread as much as I should and this question could be buried in there somewhere. I've been playing with my P25RX-II and the WIO Terminal. Are the communications protocols similar enough that a program for display/basic hold/scan functions only could be written for the SDS?
I have a question for those you who have have purchased one of those super cool and fancy remote heads for an SDS scanner. My state does NOT allow windshield mounts, so what method did you use to get it up high enough for the GPS to work and to also be visible while driving without having to look down? I'm thinking possibly a vent mount out there?
I have never looked at the P25RX protocol so I can't say. I am going to guess the answer is no. The Uniden requires specific commands to spit back a long string of comma delimited data that contains display data and special use characters. Once chopped up and placed on the display the process is repeated over and over as fast as possible to create a sort of movie film frame by frame like image.I'll be honest, I haven't been following this thread as much as I should and this question could be buried in there somewhere. I've been playing with my P25RX-II and the WIO Terminal. Are the communications protocols similar enough that a program for display/basic hold/scan functions only could be written for the SDS?
I've had decent GPS reception down lower inside the vehicle as well but then again I drive a Jeep so the fiberglass top likely helps a lot in that regard. GPS performance would be greatly enhanced by separating the GPS from the display more but there is only so much room inside. I will look into gps antenna leads with SMA ends in the future so a higher gain external antenna could be used.I have a question for those you who have have purchased one of those super cool and fancy remote heads for an SDS scanner. My state does NOT allow windshield mounts, so what method did you use to get it up high enough for the GPS to work and to also be visible while driving without having to look down? I'm thinking possibly a vent mount out there?
Has anyone tried pairing a Connect Systems BFG (Big Freakin Display) to the SDS100/200’s?
I too suffer from sunlight “bleaching” out the display on my ‘200 in my truck. I am also a ham and purchased one to pair up with Connect System’s CS800D, a DMR/VHF/UHF transceiver. It works great! The BFD is an open source display that allows for single, two or quad screens, allowing you to display more than one radio’s display at a time. It’s also fully functional as a remote head, where the radio can be tucked away.
My application was to use it to show both the ham radio and the scanner simultaneously. But software has only been written for Connect Systems offerings and one other ham radio… to date, no interest to include any scanner has been offered. Connect Systems didn’t show any interest in developing software that includes my scanner… hoping there would be enough interest on the scanner side to explore the possibilities, it would only require half the effort due to a scanner remote not needing transmitter controls.
Most states have restrictions regarding blocking the visibility when looking out thru your windshield. It includes items attached to your windshield and dash. But it’s mostly boilerplate, something the feds ask to be included, just like cell phone (electronic devices) usage. They suggest inclusion of such restrictions under threat the state runs the risk of loosing federal highway safety funding should they ignore inclusion in their state statutes. But it’s a moot point. Dash cams are usually attached to the windshield without objection, and while the remote display you refer to is a bit bigger than a dash cam, and should be mounted to the dash instead of the windshield, you won’t run into any problems with the authorities if it’s not mounted as a blatant disregard for visibility. (I was recently involved in a minor accident where I didn’t see an approaching car coming from my left, at an intersection where I was making a right hand turn. I didn’t see the car coming. While the cop said I had the right-of-way, the person who last could avoid an accident would also bear part of the blame. The reason I didn’t see the approaching car?… the left “A” post of my vehicle blocked out my view of the approaching car. So, do the feds enact a law that eliminates “A” post blind spots because they block visibility? We know that’s not happening anytime soon. “A” posts have become bigger over the years due to crash worthiness issues that require stronger roofs which don’t collapse down into the passenger compartment during rollovers. So the feds allow for “A” post blind spots. It’s basically a trade off where one rule contradicts another.) Go ahead and mount your device anywhere you like, but take into consideration it should be as less obtrusive as possible. The worst you should expect if cited for this is a requirement for inspection by your state motor vehicle dept., in which case you remove the unit before the inspection. Tell the inspector why you got the citation and ask if they can suggest an acceptable location for the device, where it doesn’t add to driver distraction, meaning a location that doesn’t require you to take your eyes off the road for more than a glance. Afterwards, you can remount your device as per instructed. But it’s highly unlikely you will ever be cited to begin with (unless you pissed off some local yokel cop who has it in for you and is watching every move you make!).I have a question for those you who have have purchased one of those super cool and fancy remote heads for an SDS scanner. My state does NOT allow windshield mounts, so what method did you use to get it up high enough for the GPS to work and to also be visible while driving without having to look down? I'm thinking possibly a vent mount out there?
Take a look at www.ProClipsUSA.com and www.rammount.com. I've cobbled parts from both to mount my SDS100, and others on here have done the same with a variety of radios.I have a question for those you who have have purchased one of those super cool and fancy remote heads for an SDS scanner. My state does NOT allow windshield mounts, so what method did you use to get it up high enough for the GPS to work and to also be visible while driving without having to look down? I'm thinking possibly a vent mount out there?
Take a look at www.ProClipsUSA.com and www.rammount.com. I've cobbled parts from both to mount my SDS100, and others on here have done the same with a variety of radios.