Now you're excited to get your SDS100 back in the mail.- You were excited to get a new crystal in the mail.
Now you're excited to get your SDS100 back in the mail.- You were excited to get a new crystal in the mail.
thought the ECPA of 1986 made it illegal?
Had a BC 101 in my car and at the office. For it's time, it was a great radio, but the switch programming made it pretty difficult to do searches. Partly out of necessity and partly "just because", I wrote a program for the Commodore 64 that would generate the switch combinations for an entered frequency.Remember setting the Electra Bearcat 101 slide switches to program a frequency from the "look up" instructions?
AND
… when your first "scanner" was a little box placed behind an AM radio that converted the local police channel to an unused AM frequency.
I listened to Los Angeles Mobile on 35.38 MHz a few times in Hanover NH on my Bearcat 210 via skip during the 1979 sunspot maximum. That was when I was also listening to LASO on 39MHz. At the end of a call after the mobile operator disconnected the phone call, the mobile operator identified with "Los Angeles Mobile...Los Angeles off" and then the transmission ends. I think the message was a tape loop because it had the sound of a well worn tape recording with lots of dropouts. A few times the tape loop did not re-cue itself properly and the message was something like "Off...Los Angeles".Yes in this area the mobile phones were in the 154 Mhz range and were fully in the clear.
Users would have to read the phone number to the operator to be called. Much like a Marine phone patch.
After the call, the operator would say, "Hartford Off - Hartford Off".
Later I used my modified PRO 2004 to monitor Cell. Highly addicting!
I remember the Newt thing quite well. I bought my ICR9000 because it was free of any restrictions. I remember a co worker posting the ECPA on a wall at work and pointing it out to me. I was listening to INMARSAT pretty regularly around then.Uh..NO.
Listening to cell phones was made illegal by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986 (ECPA '86). The law took effect on January 19, 1987. The law set a dangerous precedent of regulating people may listen to on the public airwaves, based solely on content. It was done under the illusion of privacy protection as part of a marketing ploy to make cell phones appear more attractive to uninformed users. A big red herring.
The cell block in scanners was enacted in a last minute tack-on to the Telephone Dispute and Disclosure Resolution Act of 1992, a bill that was sure to pass. Beginning on April 26, 1993, the FCC was required to deny Part 15 type acceptance to scanning receivers capable of receiving or "capable of being readily altered by the user" to receive cell phone transmissions. After April 26, 1994, "no receiver having the capabilities described above shall be manufactured or imported into the United States." This set a dangerous precedent of radio frequency censorship by Congress abusing the FCC's Equipment Authorization process to ban radio receivers having certain capabilities.
The Newt Gingrich cell phone incident in 1997 resulted in scanners being hardened up against modifications. Congress also introduced legislation (H.R.2369) that would have made ALL radio reception illegal if not the intended recipient and it would have become illegal to have a receiver capable of receiving prohibited transmissions. Modifying a receiver to receive prohibited transmissions would also be specificaly illegal. It would have also amended Section 705(a) of the Communications Act of 1934 by changing "intercept AND divulge" to "intercept OR divulge", making radio reception outright illegal and illegal to divulge even if you weren't the person who received it. Penalties would have included a $500k fine and imprisonment for up to 5 years for listening to the "wrong" radio transmissions. This was a knee jerk reaction by Congress to the Newt Gingrich cell phone incident. Thankfully this legislation did not become law.
ECPA '86 and the cell phone censorship set dangerous and grave legal precedents that say banning radio receivers and regulating what people may listen to is OK in a free society and based solely on content. This is NOT OK in my book.
You know you are an old time scanner listener when you were scanner listening when these events took place. LOL don't listen to anything I wouldn't listen to.
Sent from my XP8800 using Tapatalk
The ECPA also says that it shall not be unlawful to intercept communications that are broadcast through a system that makes them "readily accessible to the public" but leaves readily accessible to the public wide open to definition. Be sure to only monitor radio communications that are readily accessible to the public as a direct result of physical laws at work. LOL, don't listen to anything I wouldn't listen to.I remember the Newt thing quite well. I bought my ICR9000 because it was free of any restrictions. I remember a co worker posting the ECPA on a wall at work and pointing it out to me. I was listening to INMARSAT pretty regularly around then.
Sent from my SM-T350 using Tapatalk
Wrong. 18 USC Sec. 2510 (16) defines it.The ECPA also says that it shall not be unlawful to intercept communications that are broadcast through a system that makes them "readily accessible to the public" but leaves readily accessible to the public wide open to definition.