We kinda saw we would be out of luck on true TDMA P25 with OpenSKY.. It was TDMA from the ground up, only it was 4 slot, not just 2. (Which is the next progression once they actually DO get it right.)
The only reason the original flavor of OpenSky is 4-slot TDMA is because the signal occupies a 25 kHz wide channel. If you doubled the channel width of P25, you could also effectively go from 2-slot TDMA to 4-slot TDMA. That's not going to happen due to the restrictions on channel width in most bands, in particular VHF and UHF requiring 12.5 kHz narrowband channels. OpenSky 2 is 2-slot TDMA using 12.5 kHz channels, not unlike P25 TDMA.We kinda saw we would be out of luck on true TDMA P25 with OpenSKY.. It was TDMA from the ground up, only it was 4 slot, not just 2. (Which is the next progression once they actually DO get it right.)
Interesting. Also interesting is the fact that the P25 standard didn't have to play by the same rules as everyone else. Sure there might be two 6.25 kHz channels active on a single TDMA channel, but it isn't guaranteed. A slight bending of the intended rules, but I'm convinced that would not have ever happened for a small business endeavor. Regarding your earlier posts on 2-channel CC, I haven't been able to obtain the latest specs, so I can't confirm on what you said about it. It certainly seems plausible, so I assume you are correct. Thanks for the correction.The only reason the original flavor of OpenSky is 4-slot TDMA is because the signal occupies a 25 kHz wide channel. If you doubled the channel width of P25, you could also effectively go from 2-slot TDMA to 4-slot TDMA. That's not going to happen due to the restrictions on channel width in most bands, in particular VHF and UHF requiring 12.5 kHz narrowband channels. OpenSky 2 is 2-slot TDMA using 12.5 kHz channels, not unlike P25 TDMA.
P25 TDMA is two alternating slots within a 12.5 kHz wide channel, not two side-by-side 6.25 kHz channels. That makes it 6.25 kHz equivalent, which was supposed to be the next step in ultra-narrowbanding the 700 MHz spectrum, however that was nixed some time ago and it remains 12.5 kHz. Therefore there is no issue with a 12.5 kHz TDMA channel having only one slot active, as 6.25 kHz efficiency is not mandated.Interesting. Also interesting is the fact that the P25 standard didn't have to play by the same rules as everyone else. Sure there might be two 6.25 kHz channels active on a single TDMA channel, but it isn't guaranteed. A slight bending of the intended rules, but I'm convinced that would not have ever happened for a small business endeavor.
There is plenty of info out there from official sources, you don't have to take my word for it (although you probably should).Regarding your earlier posts on 2-channel CC, I haven't been able to obtain the latest specs, so I can't confirm on what you said about it. It certainly seems plausible, so I assume you are correct. Thanks for the correction.
I've been through the process many times. I'm saying I don't think that argument would have ever worked for me : ) Yes, you are correct. That is what they determined.P25 TDMA is two alternating slots within a 12.5 kHz wide channel, not two side-by-side 6.25 kHz channels. That makes it 6.25 kHz equivalent,
That's why the messages are repeated multiple times per second. Do you honestly think that was never taken into consideration? 🤦♂️These systems have gotten awfully over-complicated. Can you imagine a radio getting one little 'chip' of RF static and missing a digital packet on the control channel and then getting all screwed up.
Information collected so far from the greater Cincinnati, Ohio area.
Do you need for me to revert your changes? How far back do you want me to go?
View attachment 107131
New to the thread here and just wanted to re-post something from another thread at the request of the mods. Basically, I found a couple frequencies 854.5125 & 854.6125 WRHY215 & WRJI625 in Pinellas County, FL that both sound like some sorta control channel, but nothing like I've ever heard. They sound like a weak, snowy control channel, but they're strong signals. DSD+ doesn't decode anything. The strange thing is the sound of what's on the frequencies. It doesn't sound the same as any kind of control channel I've ever heard, if it even is a control channel. So I wonder if it's some weird new kind of system.
Found another Duke frequency 860.3875 WRHZ715 (Land O' Lakes) & WRJI625 (St. Petersburg) doing the same thing, switching between NACs 01E and FFF:
View attachment 107135
So:
854.5125 flips rapidly between 009 & FFF
854.6125 flips rapidly between 001 & FFF
860.3875 flips rapidly between 01E & FFF.
DSD+ doesn't populate any frequencies at all on the Channel Activity.
I've been running all the frequencies that are listed to them on the daily (in Gaston and Mecklenburg) while I'm at work and no luck. Only OpenSky has been active for now.Wonder when nc will start testing. As of now they are still on their 900 mhz system