I drove thru Calhoun Franklin Gulf Liberty (FL) counties didn't see anything on the P25 side. I did see 1 TG on the analog system (Tallahassee).
btw - a good start on the Duke Energy Florida licenses are:
WRJI625
WRJH815
WRHZ715
note, I had to search XXX.XXXX MHz in >>NORTH CAROLINA<< (Duke HQ) because the FCC website won't let you drill down and search via the transmitter location. All of those licenses above have florida locations in them and they are relatively current (~1 year old)
also worth noting that these are (from my quick look) -- all 800Mhz licenses for Florida... not 900.
doug
The actual answer is, and not being a smart azz, "Until they are ready to take the site/zone/region live." I have seen systems like the Entergy conversion to P25 have sites testing for only a week or two, and other sites in that same "zone" bee testing for months, then the whole section went live. I have seen sections on the VIPER, and SAFE-T P25 conversions that took only a couple of months, and other parts of those same systems need to be shut off and redone due to connectivity issues, then back to testing for a while before going live.How long do 'test' signals normally last, before a site becomes functional. A couple sites that I can receive has had test signals on them for upwards of 6 months or so.
just FYI ---- the Duke Energy site in Christmas, FL (somewhat near me) >>> 857.3875 (WRHY215)
has been confirmed as a TDMA Control Channel - currently not decodable with DSD+/Unitrunker/OP25 ... and not trackable with any scanner (yet)
>>>> P25 TDMA Control Channel decoding -- requesting help from experts
This will be a multi-state interconnected network so I recommend dropping Florida from the name on the P25 system in the database.
Duke TDMA CC site in Florida:
Duke Energy P25 Trunking System, Various, Multi-State
Duke Energy P25 Trunking System Profilewww.radioreference.com
How were you able to determine the WACN, or Sys ID?
So this whole TDMA control channel thing, does that mean they can run separate different control channels on the same RF frequency?
Being pretty close to the low level stuff and looking at earlier documentation, I will say the new control channels could also easily support 2 separate voice channels simultaneously on the control channel frequency in addition to the new control channel bursts. To answer your question, it does not look like multiple control channels. It looks like some new information (control channel) added to the TDMA channels that have been there from the beginning. The new information is handling the job that has been previously done by phase1 control channels only.So this whole TDMA control channel thing, does that mean they can run separate different control channels on the same RF frequency?