Everything NYPD encryption.

GTR8000

NY/NJ Database Guy
Database Admin
Joined
Oct 4, 2007
Messages
15,995
Location
BEE00
I thought the newer APX digital radios were incompatible with analog frequencies, which was why the NYPD was stuck using Vertex radios that were made exclusively for them?
I'm not sure where you heard that, but it's incorrect. The entire APX line is fully capable of analog in any band. In fact, you have to pay for the features to make it P25 and/or trunking capable, else you have a very expensive radio that is capable of conventional analog only.
 

KevinC

The big K
Super Moderator
Joined
Jan 7, 2001
Messages
12,458
Location
1 point
I'm not sure where you heard that, but it's incorrect. The entire APX line is fully capable of analog in any band. In fact, you have to pay for the features to make it P25 and/or trunking capable, else you have a very expensive radio that is capable of conventional analog only.

Oh! You want it to work also?? Open the checkbook. 😋
 

GTR8000

NY/NJ Database Guy
Database Admin
Joined
Oct 4, 2007
Messages
15,995
Location
BEE00
Hey, don't laugh...I know a fire dept that purchased a few APX 8000's assuming they would work on the neighboring county's 700 TDMA system, only to discover that apparently nobody bothered to discuss usage requirements with the dealer, and so they wound up with only the UHF band provisioned, and conventional analog only. Very expensive fireground radios, essentially. And of course it was more money per feature to order the flash upgrades vs if they had ordered the radio with the needed options from the get go. 🤦‍♂️
 

JethrowJohnson

I love P25
Joined
Sep 10, 2022
Messages
934
Location
Marietta OH
Hey, don't laugh...I know a fire dept that purchased a few APX 8000's assuming they would work on the neighboring county's 700 TDMA system, only to discover that apparently nobody bothered to discuss usage requirements with the dealer, and so they wound up with only the UHF band provisioned, and conventional analog only. Very expensive fireground radios, essentially. And of course it was more money per feature to order the flash upgrades vs if they had ordered the radio with the needed options from the get go. 🤦‍♂️
Well that sucks. I thought the APXs were all-band.
 

KevinC

The big K
Super Moderator
Joined
Jan 7, 2001
Messages
12,458
Location
1 point
Hey, don't laugh...I know a fire dept that purchased a few APX 8000's assuming they would work on the neighboring county's 700 TDMA system, only to discover that apparently nobody bothered to discuss usage requirements with the dealer, and so they wound up with only the UHF band provisioned, and conventional analog only. Very expensive fireground radios, essentially. And of course it was more money per feature to order the flash upgrades vs if they had ordered the radio with the needed options from the get go. 🤦‍♂️

And whatever you do, DO NOT order with”no encryption”. It can be fixed, but it takes favors or a friendly ST with the right privileges.
 

slayer23

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 13, 2017
Messages
21
City agencies don't use half of the radio circuits they have and nobody is really keeping track of the ones they have. They can trim the fat off the budget but nobody wants to put in the work. On top of that the prices of the radios/equipment that they buy are inflated by %10-%20 depending on the contractual agreements. A certain city agency spends 12k a pop for each radio they buy.
 

slayer23

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 13, 2017
Messages
21
Being a lifelong New Yorker and someone who monitors on a daily basis and manages 3 large sites and BMS, I can confirm that 95% of the information in this post is hearsay and garbage.
I work in an environment that provides an ARC systems for NYPD as well as FDNY and there has been no talk of upgrading to anything encrypted.
The company I work for works closely with many city agencies and we also have 2 direct lines to both radio systems on our ARCS which is legally required by NYC and FDNY codes in buildings over 75 feet tall. We also have a direct patch on our current radio system to FDNY at all 3 buildings I manage which are above 30 stories.
I do believe that digital is coming soon with rolling encryption, but because of the need to be linked in, (Like 1/3 WTC, 30 Rock, Carnegie Hall) and other major sites that depend on ARCS, the city would have notified us by now.
2 of 3 of the control rooms I visit on a daily basis have citywide feeds in the consoles on top of other channels utilized by the city or state for emergency response.
We also are legally required to provide a minimum of 15 in house radios to responding FDNY units at the FCP and command center that can link into the ARCS.
If anything, I believe the citywide and SOD channels will go E as well as all the simplex tac channels. But anyone's guess is as good as mine at this point.

Please for the love of god fix the alarms on the ARCS
 

slayer23

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 13, 2017
Messages
21

ten13

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Aug 13, 2009
Messages
673
Location
ten13
Everyone is all upset because, in their minds, police departments like the NYPD are considering encryption are doing so only to screw them personally, the "scanner hobbyist," or to "coverup" some type of misdeeds by the PD.

Comparing your police department in "East Cupcake" somewhere to the NYPD is ludicrous.

During the Summer of 2020 Riots, NYC was under riot conditions as bad as, if not worse, than the 1960s and 70s. During those 2020 riots, the intentional radio interference and false radio runs for "assists," "shots fired," etc., caused MAJOR problems, directing scarce resources to malicious radio transmissions. That, plus the frequent (and long-term) "keying up" of radios forcing, at one point, to have an entire detail of cops (sometimes numbering in the hundreds) to switch to another channel, a difficult, and "hit-and-miss," task under the environment they were in.

The only solution for that is to use encryption. It's something whose time has come, certainly for a PD like the NYPD, and it's not going away anytime soon, or ever.

Taking it as a personal affront against you, the owners of new $700 radio, while unfortunate, is more of a comment upon yourself than the situation.

Get over it......
 

Danny37

Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2013
Messages
1,341
Location
New York City
While I agree with most of what you're saying. The encryption was decided way before the 2020 riots. And the "key ups" are usually caused by other UMOS who either lean on their radios or whatever other reason. Listen to any big citywide detail and you'll hear keyups
 

ten13

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Aug 13, 2009
Messages
673
Location
ten13
And the "key ups" are usually caused by other UMOS who either lean on their radios or whatever other reason

That's usually true, but during the riots it was malicious intent; not the usually "stuck mic button," but continuous clicking of the mic, etc., and for a long time, and all night.

The best I would offer the "scanner hobbyists" is that the "important" frequencies will be encrypted (SOD, CW1, 2, possibly 3), with the precinct radios remaining in the clear. And even with that, the option of switching to an encrypted channel, possibly upon turning out at the start of a tour when the s*** is hitting the fan within a precinct, etc., would most likely be possible.
 

PD47JD

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Sep 13, 2021
Messages
415
Location
Connecticut
Everyone is all upset because, in their minds, police departments like the NYPD are considering encryption are doing so only to screw them personally, the "scanner hobbyist," or to "coverup" some type of misdeeds by the PD.

Comparing your police department in "East Cupcake" somewhere to the NYPD is ludicrous.

During the Summer of 2020 Riots, NYC was under riot conditions as bad as, if not worse, than the 1960s and 70s. During those 2020 riots, the intentional radio interference and false radio runs for "assists," "shots fired," etc., caused MAJOR problems, directing scarce resources to malicious radio transmissions. That, plus the frequent (and long-term) "keying up" of radios forcing, at one point, to have an entire detail of cops (sometimes numbering in the hundreds) to switch to another channel, a difficult, and "hit-and-miss," task under the environment they were in.

The only solution for that is to use encryption. It's something whose time has come, certainly for a PD like the NYPD, and it's not going away anytime soon, or ever.

Taking it as a personal affront against you, the owners of new $700 radio, while unfortunate, is more of a comment upon yourself than the situation.

Get over it......
Excellent post. No lack of A=holes who get off on jamming NYPD.
 

Hbright

Active Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2018
Messages
1,250
Everyone is all upset because, in their minds, police departments like the NYPD are considering encryption are doing so only to screw them personally, the "scanner hobbyist," or to "coverup" some type of misdeeds by the PD.

Comparing your police department in "East Cupcake" somewhere to the NYPD is ludicrous.

During the Summer of 2020 Riots, NYC was under riot conditions as bad as, if not worse, than the 1960s and 70s. During those 2020 riots, the intentional radio interference and false radio runs for "assists," "shots fired," etc., caused MAJOR problems, directing scarce resources to malicious radio transmissions. That, plus the frequent (and long-term) "keying up" of radios forcing, at one point, to have an entire detail of cops (sometimes numbering in the hundreds) to switch to another channel, a difficult, and "hit-and-miss," task under the environment they were in.

The only solution for that is to use encryption. It's something whose time has come, certainly for a PD like the NYPD, and it's not going away anytime soon, or ever.

Taking it as a personal affront against you, the owners of new $700 radio, while unfortunate, is more of a comment upon yourself than the situation.

Get over it......
My local agency (largest in the state) uses a digital unencrypted system and has never had an issue with non-sworn people transmitting. That would be extremely technically challenging, if not impossible to do. The NYPD’s problem is that they use an (almost) entirely analog system, which anyone with a $20 Baofeng can access, not only to listen, but also to (illegally) transmit. There’s a large gap, in my opinion, between upgrading a system to prevent malicious transmissions, and encryption.
 

richee2000

Communications Professional
Joined
Sep 29, 2014
Messages
2,274
Location
Sea Bright NJ, East Hanover NJ, Basking Ridge NJ
My local agency (largest in the state) uses a digital unencrypted system and has never had an issue with non-sworn people transmitting. That would be extremely technically challenging, if not impossible to do. The NYPD’s problem is that they use an (almost) entirely analog system, which anyone with a $20 Baofeng can access, not only to listen, but also to (illegally) transmit. There’s a large gap, in my opinion, between upgrading a system to prevent malicious transmissions, and encryption.

Well Said!! TOTALLY agree. P25 Digital with Dispatch in the Clear is the way to go.....With Tac channels Encrypted..... This way, you satisfy Transparency, Security, Public Awareness, Press availablity, And Stopping Illegal Transmitters. The subject of Full Time Encryption is far from a dead issue. The Horse is alive and well..... Just look at the cities in California that have done away with full time E , after public outcry..... its not just about "scanner hobbyists"
 
Last edited:

ten13

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Aug 13, 2009
Messages
673
Location
ten13
P25 Digital with Dispatch in the clear is the way to go.

That's easier said than done....for NYC.

NYC is...and will be, for quite awhile...in a dire financial situation, equal to, or worse than, the 1970s, when thousands of cops and firemen...among other city employees...were laid off (the 4,000 was only the beginning) ......

42e2f7af-75af-4f3a-ad3f-fe656984e620-1360x2040.jpeg


Changing the entire radio system for the entire NYPD is, for all intents and purposes, out of the question.

Let's remember that when everyone was required to narrowband their radio systems, the NYPD sought, and got, a waiver from the FCC from doing so, solely on the expense of it all.

The number of repeaters and local receivers alone throughout the city solely for the NYPD would astound the "East Cupcake" crowd, making the cost of conversion prohibitive.
 

hitechRadio

Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2010
Messages
556
I always find it interesting the argument against encryption,,seems the favorite among the NOENC guys is "transparency"!...But then in the same breath,, "But I'm OK with encryption on TAC channels"!!! :rolleyes::unsure:
 

richee2000

Communications Professional
Joined
Sep 29, 2014
Messages
2,274
Location
Sea Bright NJ, East Hanover NJ, Basking Ridge NJ
IMO, Every LE agency should have Encryption available on Non dispatch secure TAC channels, for sensitive comms..... No one is arguing against that. As far as budget, NY City is spending $500 Million to upgrade, according to reporting. So, "Where's the money?"
 
Top