I am wondering if the certification process looks at things like the removable antenna thing or if it just certifies spectral purity, etc. If the later is the case, even if they pass testing they would still be illegal to use based on the fact that you can swap off the antenna for a larger one, higher gain, add an amp, etc. Comments?
EDIT- Looking over the 95e section it seems that if it passes the section it already would meet the requirements of the section including the things I quoted earlier - no Digital capability on 467MHz, no removable antennas, etc. I would be curious to find a "certified" unit with a removable antenna. I think some companies claim Part 90 and use that as a sort of blanket when it really doesn't apply to specific services.
Sean
The type certification process involves making sure the device meets all the rules of the part it's being certified under. For GMRS/95E, that means frequency capability, power, emission type, bandwidth limitations, etc.
But the whole process is done outside the FCC. Manufacturers can either do the testing internally or hire a lab, to do the certification testing and file the paperwork.
The FCC certifies the lab. If the certification paperwork comes from an approved lab, then it usually just gets rubber stamped and sent on it's way.
Unfortunately, there are some labs/companies that don't really care what the FCC thinks. They'll submit results of testing and claim it meets the 95E requirements. Some knucklehead at the FCC rubber stamps it and lets it go. There's been instances of the FCC approving a radio even though the testing shows it doesn't meet the requirements.
In other words, the FCC has let the manufacturers run the show.
Most companies are honest, but some are not. China and the Chinese manufacturers don't really care about the RF landscape in the USA, all they want is to sell shiploads of cheap radios as fast as they can.
And then the consumer public doesn't know what they are doing either, they just buy crap on line "assuming" it's OK.
But there's a lot to it.
GMRS can have removable antennas. FRS can't.
Radios, in certain services, can be certified under multiple services. In other radio services (MURS, FRS, etc) they can only be certified under one.
Yeah, some choose to use Part 90 radios. That's an interesting question. The FCC rewrote the GMRS rules a few years back and they are aware of this. However, they chose not to change the requirements. The way it's worded can be misinterpreted by those that really want to, to say that as long as it meets the requirements, it's OK, doesn't matter what the certification is on the radio. Then there are those that toe the line and will only use radios that are Part 95E certified.
And then there are those that don't care and will use whatever radio they can trick into working on the frequencies. A few well established cases of amateurs (who really should know better) modifying amateur radios to transmit out of band. They tend to treat GMRS as their playground. And like I said, they don't care, will often use their amateur call signs on GMRS frequencies.
As I've mentioned in other posts, I'm NOT the radio police and I don't really care what others do as long as none of it splatters on me, but there are a lot of issues that people don't think about when using the wrong radios in the wrong places.
But that's a whole different discussion.