Goosetown/Triangle Communications Tier 3 System

pro92b

Mutated Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 27, 2002
Messages
1,949
Site 131 is still L5 as well. 131 has been removed from site 134 neighbors list also. I don't expect 131 to remain at L5 and will check occasionally to see if it changes.
 

GTR8000

NY/NJ Database Guy
Database Admin
Joined
Oct 4, 2007
Messages
15,966
Location
BEE00
Site 131 is still L5 as well. 131 has been removed from site 134 neighbors list also. I don't expect 131 to remain at L5 and will check occasionally to see if it changes.
Affirm, I observed that last night as well.

Friendly reminder to all following this thread/the system that it's very much in flux during the buildout stage, so expect the unexpected.
 

pro92b

Mutated Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 27, 2002
Messages
1,949
Site 131 is now H3. Site 121 has added 131 in its neighbors list.
 

CqDx

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
May 15, 2003
Messages
1,245
Location
US
With the change from L5 to H3, do I need to change TIIInonStd as well?
 

GTR8000

NY/NJ Database Guy
Database Admin
Joined
Oct 4, 2007
Messages
15,966
Location
BEE00
This is a non-standard Selex Tier III system. The only parameter that has changed since I posted my examples is L5 to H3.
 

CqDx

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
May 15, 2003
Messages
1,245
Location
US
Picking up Site 113 on 454.29375, Alpine NJ site.

Neighbors with Pomona (111) and Valhalla (112)
 

GTR8000

NY/NJ Database Guy
Database Admin
Joined
Oct 4, 2007
Messages
15,966
Location
BEE00
And so it turns out that I'm a moron, and prematurely separated the two systems. They are in fact still connected, that is 100% confirmed, and Triangle will soon update their half of the system to H3 to match Goosetown. I will be undoing the changes I made yesterday separating the two systems. My bad. 😬🤦‍♂️🤡
 

AK9R

Lead Wiki Manager and almost an Awesome Moderator
Super Moderator
Joined
Jul 18, 2004
Messages
9,913
Location
Central Indiana
I got a request to delete the Triangle Communications (Tier 3) articles from the Wiki as system has been deleted from the database.

Would deleting the related Wiki articles be the appropriate action? Is there any value in retaining the related Wiki articles for public view?
 

seagravebuff60

Short Bus Reject
Feed Provider
Joined
Jun 11, 2016
Messages
1,048
Location
New York State
Would deleting the related Wiki articles be the appropriate action? Is there any value in retaining the related Wiki articles for public view?
Yes, deleting them would be the appropriate action as the system had been split off on the 28th and merged back to the OneVoice MAX system on the 29th. So now all triangle sites are now OneVoice MAX

The Triangle Communications T3 system has from what i understand been deleted from the database, as so the related wikis can be. All of the Triangle Communications Wiki info has been reverted back (by me) to the OneVoice MAX wiki where it should be.
 

Whiskey3JMC

Just another lowly hobbyist
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jul 16, 2006
Messages
7,673
Location
Philly burbs 🇺🇸
The two sites I'm within range of: 200 (Malvern) and 203 (Quarryville) are both now reporting CC1 instead of their RRDB-listed CCs (3 & 11 respectively) Not sure if I should wait a bit longer to see if they change back before making the update submission...
 

cg

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 13, 2000
Messages
4,830
Location
Connecticut
Bloomfield CT Site 104 is no longer active. Perhaps it was only for testing or staging at the Bloomfield Goosetown building. No longer shows as a Neighbor on the Farmington CT, Rattlesnake Mtn site or the Holyoke MA, Mt Tom site.

chris
 

u2brent

OAMPT
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jul 17, 2010
Messages
3,137
Location
KRWDPAXKRS1
The two sites I'm within range of: 200 (Malvern) and 203 (Quarryville) are both now reporting CC1 instead of their RRDB-listed CCs (3 & 11 respectively) Not sure if I should wait a bit longer to see if they change back before making the update submission...
Appears that everything is in flux, sys id's aren't all H3. All sites are currently DCC1 from my vantage point. It's unclear that this will be the final configuration. They very well may go back to the DCC's that are posted in the DB. They've been like this for over 2 weeks. But for now they are indeed DCC1. And there are a few ch#s that have changed as well.
 

u2brent

OAMPT
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jul 17, 2010
Messages
3,137
Location
KRWDPAXKRS1
IDK about the York Co sites. 203 shows no neighbors. Likely due to the curent H1 sys id.
 

GTR8000

NY/NJ Database Guy
Database Admin
Joined
Oct 4, 2007
Messages
15,966
Location
BEE00
The Triangle sites are in the process of changing over to H3 to match Goosetown. Expect the color codes to also change, or have already changed, etc.

Friendly reminder that updates should be submitted to the database. It's all fine and well to post about changes or make changes to wiki pages, but that's not how the database gets updated.
 

u2brent

OAMPT
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jul 17, 2010
Messages
3,137
Location
KRWDPAXKRS1
FYI,
Be on the lookout, 201 may be online as Concordville.
CH#
7555 501.5375
7775 502.9125
WPLR257
per 199's current NL
Triangle sites are still DCC1 atm.
 
Top