Jackson County Radio system upgrade

Status
Not open for further replies.

N8IAA

Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
7,243
Location
Fortunately, GA
Why don’t we all take a step back and look at the big picture. The system that we currently have needs to be updated. Like every other county is this nation money is tight so everyone is working hard to see that Jackson County gets the best radio system with the money that we do have. Public safety personnel will benefit greatly from this new system which means that the citizens of this county too will benefit. Isn’t it this what really matters? Stay Safe!!! E. Gilbert KJ4CZE

E. Gilbert, what everyone has been trying to elaborate on, is that they are spending money for a radio system that is not compatible with other VHF/UHF systems in the state. Officer safety is always at the front. I know a lot of LEO's and fire fighters, and safe, reliable comms are needed to protect them. But, where is the benefit to the citizens of Jackson county when they can't follow the comms for their own safety? You certainly won't be providing a feed to RR for those who can't buy a scanner to listen. Changing the bandwidth doesn't mean that they have to go to a digital format to have reliable comms. This is propagated by /\/\otorola sales people around the country to boost sales. If the county could upgrade radios and other equipment to the new fed requirements without having to change to a digital format, is that not a benefit for the citizens of the county, as well as, the public servants? Isn't there an old adage that says- 'a penny saved is a penny earned'?
Just my own thoughts,
Larry
 
Last edited:

JRayfield

Member
Joined
Jul 31, 2009
Messages
797
Location
Springfield, MO
I can't find any reference, anywhere, to conventional operation with regards to APCO 16. Can you please give me a reference on this, so that I can read up more on it?

How long have you been in the landmobile communications industry? I've been working in it for 32 years now and have been doing consulting (technical and marketing) with communications manufacturers for around 17 or so.

By the way, MotoTRBO isn't ESMR. ESMR is Enhanced Specialized Mobile Radio. One of the key functions of ESMR is hand-off between cells (tower sites) during a call (just like cellular) and the system must be operating on 800 mhz SMR frequencies. MotoTRBO is not ESMR.

"Tested or certified" for public safety use? To what testing and certification are you referring? Mil-Spec standards? That's all the 'testing or certification' that analog radios, such as Motorola HT-1250's, CDM-1250's, and Vertex Standard radios meet. Or are you referring to something else?

By your comment about OpenSky, it sounds like you've never actually used a MotoTRBO radio system. The end users (public safety agencies) that I've spoken with, sure wouldn't agree with you on this point - they love the way their MotoTRBO systems are operating.

As to grants, I know a lot of people who have used grant money to purchase P25 radios. And their getting absolutely nothing out of those radios, that an inexpensive analog radio wouldn't have done. These rural agencies can't afford P25 trunking system infrastructure (there isn't enough grant money to around for that), and conventional P25 doesn't give them any better coverage than their analog systems, so that's not an option anyway. Agencies that want something to work can always spend their own money and that's what some are doing.

John Rayfield, Jr. - CETma

And you are so wrong, APCO16 compliant CONVENTIONAL radio systems have been in operation for close to 20+ years. Agencies such as the NYPD use conventional analog voice with APCO16 compliant subscriber radios, you know, everything the Motorola Saber analog radios to their Vertex Standard VX520's that replace them. And the NYPD seems to be very happy with their analog radio system, 2 watt on hip portable coverage in 99 percent of the entire city? Yeah I see them going out to buy MotoTRBO tomorrow. If anything they are more concerned about narrowbanding as the cost of doing anything to a radio system that is in use 24/7/365 in a city the size of NYC is a major logistical hassle. In short, their system works, and works well, and they would like to keep it that way.

You are drinking too much MotoKOOLAID. Motorola is asking for trouble, MotoTRBO is a bad idea for public safety. Motorola needs to lower their price point on Astro 25 to remain competitive with other vendors, not offer up some half butt ESMR ala iDEN 2010 network as a solution when it doesn't even meet public safety industry standards and hasn't been tested or certified for such use. That is just plain STUPID on their part.

Conventional analog radio can perform quite well, again, ask anyone who uses the NYPD UHF conventional system and they will most likely concur. Any radio system can be horrible if it is not implemented correctly and isn't appropriate by design for the application it's being used in.

Case in point is MotoTRBO. Wanna see what happens when you use something like MotoTRBO? Can you say OpenSKY? Yeah, that's going real well for the state of NY and PA.

Not to mention, no Federal grants will pay for ESMR's, only Project 25. So what do you tell your customers when they find out they can't get any SAFECOM grants to help pay for their new MotoTOYZ?
 

JRayfield

Member
Joined
Jul 31, 2009
Messages
797
Location
Springfield, MO
I found a reference to APCO 16 - on the APCO website. :)

"Project 16
The opening of the 900 MHz band by the FCC offered the public safety community the chance to develop communications systems with significantly enhanced capabilities. The advent of trunked communications systems coupled with digital addressing techniques made possible an entirely new approach to public safety communications systems design.

APCO's Project 16 addressed specific characteristics and functional capabilities of those systems; the intention was to create a system concept that would satisfy the minimum needs of all potential users and permit the inclusion of more complex requirements needed by some communities then or in the future. Project 16 addressed such characteristics and capabilities as channel access times, automated priority recognition, data systems interface, individuality of system users, command and control flexibility, system growth capability, frequency use and reliability. The final document also described a multi-channel mobile communications system that uses digital addressing techniques and frequency switching systems."

Interesting - it only mentions trunking, not conventional. If you can find me any other information that indicates that APCO 16 dealt with conventional systems/radios, I'd love to read it.

John Rayfield, Jr. - CET-ma

And you are so wrong, APCO16 compliant CONVENTIONAL radio systems have been in operation for close to 20+ years. Agencies such as the NYPD use conventional analog voice with APCO16 compliant subscriber radios, you know, everything the Motorola Saber analog radios to their Vertex Standard VX520's that replace them.
 

ScanJackson

Member
Joined
Aug 11, 2007
Messages
3
Location
Jackson County Georgia
Hey Larry,

Let me start off by saying that unfortunately I have not had the time to read all the post listed in this thread so I apologize in advance for my ignorance for not knowing everything that everyone has elaborated on. I do know that a lot of what I have read is from misinformed individuals spreading rumors. I will also like to thank you for at least sharing your first name. This is more than a lot of others are willing to do. I was brought up with an understanding that if you are going to speak your mind or in this case write what is on your mind, and believe in what you are saying then you should not be afraid and hide who you are. Standup for what you believe in, face your opposition, and have a good old debate about the topic without all the name calling and threatening. Hiding behind a alias or screen name in my opinion is just childish and weak. So again I thank you. TK put his initials in his message (if in fact he did write the message) knowing that anyone that knows even a little bit about Jackson County communications would know who he is. He didn’t write a message and hide behind any alias. 1268 was correct when he stated that T K has done a great job keeping the system running with bubblegum. Though it isn’t actually bubblegum being used TK has searched through the radio bone yard to keep the system going during a time when there was no money for replacement. Budget cuts came at a time when the budget was already at a bare minimum. There is no telling how many furlough days have been saved by TK’s ability to get the system back online and working while others were saying that it couldn’t be done.

With that said now please allow me to speak about the rest of your message:

Compatibility Issue – Without going into details I can assure you that we will be able to communicate with every surrounding county.

Officer Safety – Can you put a dollar figure on someone’s life? We live in a much different world now than before. It is more dangerous now for public safety officers than ever before. If you live in Jackson County or listen to a scanner often I’m sure that you are aware of the heavy police presents on I-85. As I have read on a lot of other websites majority of the people believe that these are speed traps. Most are not, most are searching for drug traffickers. I’m sure that I do not need to tell everyone that drug trafficking is a big multimillion dollars business. People get killed every day for a lot less. Every time a officer goes on a traffic stop on the interstate they run the risk of meeting up with one of these drug traffickers. Each time the officer runs a license plate or ask for license information of one of these drug traffickers they take the risk of a drug partner hearing this information. This can be bad in many ways for the safety of the officer, the officers family, and the safety of the traffickers. Yes, unfortunately we have to be concerned with their safety too. If we ever meet face to face I will tell you about an incident that happened to me while I worked at Winder PD and how I keep having something like this from happening over ScanJackson. So many times officers will be at a domestic call and family members who heard it on the scanner or have had a friend phone them after hearing it on a scanner start showing up adding fuel to the fire. Very quickly the officers become out numbered. What started off as a simple domestic involving two people becomes a family feud with as many as twenty people showing up.

Citizen Safety – My turn to quote an old adage – “curiosity killed the cat.” :eek:) People are naturally curious, often good hearted people with the best intentions come to assist arrive on a scene and become part of the problem. They put themselves, others, and the officer in more danger. The officer not knowing who this person is has to keep in his mind that they might be the perpetrator. These few minutes to get this information cleared up can prove costly in allowing the real perpetrator to escape. Once the officer has determined that the subject is not a danger he still has to worry about their safety too. Now he is worrying about the victim, the victims family, the good samaritan, and himself. The more people on scene the more he has to protect.
When I wrote, “Public safety personnel will benefit greatly from this new system which means that the citizens of this county too will benefit.” I was thinking of how the encryption benefits the citizens with privacy. Do you want everyone to know that you just got pulled over for speeding, running a red light, or maybe DUI. Do you want everyone hearing about your domestic problems with your wife or child. Strangers listening live to what could be the worst day of your life. Sure it might make it to the news paper. Maybe, maybe not. If it does at least you have had a couple of days to try to pull yourself together to speak about it rather than it just now happening.

I also meant everyone will benefit from this new system because of the clarity of the transmission. If you listen now I’m sure that you will agree that because of units from Jackson County and other agencies using the same frequency transmitting at the same time often there is trouble understanding one another. With the new system we will not have doubling taking place. What some incorrectly call “bleed over” is actually doubling. I’m sure that you know however for the ones that do not Doubling in two way radio is where two or more transmitters transmit at once, often garbling both messages. Just this by itself is beneficiary to the citizens because it will reduce the chance of miscommunications. Getting the address right the first time and save valuable time. During extreme busy times when there are many calls in one small area sometimes police, fire, and EMS misunderstand which location they are heading to. Nobody’s fault, it is just a lot of transmissions taking place in a short amount of time with a lot of doubling. Officer 1 hears dispatch talking to Officer 2 however Officer 1 believes that the radio traffic is for him so he goes to the same location as Officer 2 when he should have been going to a different location. Same thing happens for fire and EMS. During the organized chaos there was simply a miscommunication. It happens, however with the new system the chance of this happening will be reduced dramatically.

Don’t misunderstand me, I will miss not being able to scan PD and SO. I will miss hearing my sons tag number being called out as he is getting pulled over again for speeding. Waiting to see when or if he is going to tell me about it. I will miss the excitement of a good foot or car chase. There are a lot of things that I will miss hearing.

What will I do after the PD and SO make the move? I’m not sure, I will probable still provide a feed for fire dispatch and whenever there is a SkyWarn activation send that information through the feed as well. You tell me what you want to hear. Please everyone send me an email at egilbert@westjacksonfd.com telling me what you want to hear. With the height of our antenna we can receive a lot of different surrounding departments. Maybe you want me to provide a feed only for fire dispatches from surrounding counties. Anyone interested in listening to air traffic? You would be surprised how much air traffic there is in Jackson County. Do you want to listen to Ham radio? I’m open to suggestions, feed back please.

Sorry that I got carried away, until next time, Stay Safe!!!

Anyone interested in becoming a Amateur Radio Operator or a SkyWarn member please contact me.


Ed Gilbert
 

JRayfield

Member
Joined
Jul 31, 2009
Messages
797
Location
Springfield, MO
Ed, I really appreciate your post. I work with public-safety communications almost every day and I'm always trying to learn as much as possible about 'how' law enforcement officers do their jobs. That way, I can try my best to make sure that the communications systems that I work on, work the best for what they need. Your description of what sometimes goes on in the 'work day' for a law enforcement officer, is very helpful to me.

Larry, you're making an assumption that the old analog system can be 'upgraded' to do what the county needs it to do. I don't have personal knowledge of Jackson County, but in my area, there are many counties that need better coverage than what their old analog systems can provide. To upgrade these systems to wide-area coverage would cost more money than what these counties can afford and the systems would still not be anywhere near 'perfect'. On the other hand, the newer digital technologies can be implemented for less money than what it would cost to 'upgrade' the analog systems, and these new digital technologies are superior in performance to analog.

John Rayfield, Jr. - CETma
WØPM
 

nunyax

Member
Feed Provider
Joined
Jun 5, 2008
Messages
371
Location
Walton County, GA
What will I do after the PD and SO make the move? I’m not sure, I will probable still provide a feed for fire dispatch and whenever there is a SkyWarn activation send that information through the feed as well. You tell me what you want to hear.

Hi Eddie,

With your connections in the FD, do you think permission could be obtained to stream an official feed of fire dispatch and tac channels using a DMR radio? The Hytera models are about the same price as a digital scanner, quite a bit less than a Motorola MOTOTRBO radio. Also, is it a definite yes on the use of encryption, even on fire channels?

BTW, ham MOTOTRBO repeaters are growing in number as well: MOTOTRBO Yahoo Group
Maybe you'll like it so much you'll switch from DSTAR. :D

Thanks,
Joe
KQ4XL
 
Last edited:

N8IAA

Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
7,243
Location
Fortunately, GA
Ed, having been a radio operator for over 25 years, I know the problems of using a single repeater. Most 'doubling' occurs because in the heat of the moment, no one waits to hear if there is a response. Believe it or not, I hear it on trunked systems too. Simplex thrown into the mix just makes for more problems. Only time will tell if Jackson becomes richer from their I-85 drug busts. Gwinnett used the 'officer safety' issue to encrypt the PD's and SO. Just as Hall has done. Yeah, we live in a different world now. But, when the MDT is used for running a plate and personal info, there is no need to hide behind the officer safety issue. Otherwise, Cobb, Forsyth, De Kalb, City of Atlanta, and Fulton would be doing it too. I will try to make this my last post on the subject of Jackson county. I feel your pain, but, when you do something wrong in public............fill in the blanks however you wish.
Larry
 
Last edited:

1268

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 11, 2005
Messages
485
As the thread starter let me clarify somethings that both Tommy And Ed have obviously misconstrued here.
My intent was to inform this community of a impending change in the county radio system and what "maybe" coming down the pike.
No one gentleman is being anti-public safety here and as for the digital and encryption debate..trunked P25 or Motorbo etc those have literally hundreds of threads here and is subject that gets hashed out in this community daily.
My only pet peeve was that the project was not handled in a more open manner. With that said Jackson needed a new system and Steve,David and Tommy are to be commended for working on this project and keeping our currant system going...lord knows it's a dinosour.
Eddie check your PM.
 

MTS2000des

5B2_BEE00 Czar
Joined
Jul 12, 2008
Messages
5,842
Location
Cobb County, GA Stadium Crime Zone
I found a reference to APCO 16 - on the APCO website. :)

"Project 16
The opening of the 900 MHz band by the FCC offered the public safety community the chance to develop communications systems with significantly enhanced capabilities. The advent of trunked communications systems coupled with digital addressing techniques made possible an entirely new approach to public safety communications systems design.

APCO's Project 16 addressed specific characteristics and functional capabilities of those systems; the intention was to create a system concept that would satisfy the minimum needs of all potential users and permit the inclusion of more complex requirements needed by some communities then or in the future. Project 16 addressed such characteristics and capabilities as channel access times, automated priority recognition, data systems interface, individuality of system users, command and control flexibility, system growth capability, frequency use and reliability. The final document also described a multi-channel mobile communications system that uses digital addressing techniques and frequency switching systems."

Interesting - it only mentions trunking, not conventional. If you can find me any other information that indicates that APCO 16 dealt with conventional systems/radios, I'd love to read it.

John Rayfield, Jr. - CET-ma

I find it interesting that a self-proclaimed veteran of a business that sells to public safety didn't even know what APCO 16 feature sets were. You claim to have been in the radio business for how long? Can you tell me what the STAT-ALERT feature set is availble on Motorola conventional radios since the late 1980's is? What is MDC1200, MODAT, etc? What features exist in Project 25 conventional radio systems that mimic or enhance Project 16?
That ought to keep you Googling for a while. What is an MDC terminal used for?

I am not going to get into what I do for a living. People that know me know what I do, where I work, and my reputation speaks for itself.

The bottom line is MotoTRBO, OpenSKY and other such systems ARE NOT designed for public safety use.

Since you dodged one major issue, I'll raise it again and see what your response is. MotoTRBO does NOT qualify for Federal SAFECOM grant money, nor does NXDN, or OpenSky. So what answer do you give government agencies when they ask about applying for grant money to buy these systems?

And OpenSKY is so great? Please, have you watched this video?YouTube - Milwaukee Fire Department Local 215 Representative concerned about new radio system

How many millions of taxpayers get wasted on junk like OpenSKY, with NO FEDERAL MONEY and still Milwaukee hasn't gotten what they've paid for?

(at least the county I live and work in got some SAFECOM money- but then they bought an P25 compliant solution not some business radio crap. And at least we'll be able to link in to the one day promised region wide P25 700/800 system.)

Where will Jackson county be in 5 years when they are done paying off this stuff? Exactly where they are now, isolated. Everyone else is going Astro 25. Would not a more prudent and cost effective solution be in the short term, narrowband existing VHF analog and apply for Federal grant money and pass a SPLOST and buy what they really want and need?
 
Last edited:

MTS2000des

5B2_BEE00 Czar
Joined
Jul 12, 2008
Messages
5,842
Location
Cobb County, GA Stadium Crime Zone
Why don’t we all take a step back and look at the big picture. The system that we currently have needs to be updated. Like every other county is this nation money is tight so everyone is working hard to see that Jackson County gets the best radio system with the money that we do have. Public safety personnel will benefit greatly from this new system which means that the citizens of this county too will benefit.

Isn’t it this what really matters?

Stay Safe!!!

E. Gilbert
KJ4CZE

The big picture is where will Jackson county be in 5 years. What kind of interoperability will going to a closed walled garden on a different band (UHF as opposed to VHF or 700/800) and a proprietary system (you can currently only buy MOTOROLA subscriber radios work on MotoTRBO systems) give you?

Where will Jackson county be when a LODD occurs because of using such an uncertified for public safety business radio system for public safety be?
How much money will Jackson county be saving when they cannot talk to any surrounding agencies who will be on either VHF conventional or 700/800 trunking systems?

With the move on agencies in Metro Atlanta going to Astro 25 SZ V7 700/800 trunked systems, the footprint of a regional trunked radio system is in the works. Jackson county is making a colossal mistake on so many levels. They will be left out worse than they are now (as today multiband radios exist that support VHF, 700 and 800) from Motorola that are P25 compliant. MotoTRBO is NOT a solution for public safety, nor is OpenSKY, or NXDN. Ask the states of New York, Pennsylvania or the city of Milwaukee about OpenSky.

the prudent short term solution is bank your money, narrowband your VHF system (which costs a fraction of implementing a new radio system like MotoTRBO on a different RF band), work with your commissioners to pass a SPLOST, apply for SAFECOM grants, and build out a system that is certified for public safety use and compatible with what everyone around you is doing.
 
Last edited:

MTS2000des

5B2_BEE00 Czar
Joined
Jul 12, 2008
Messages
5,842
Location
Cobb County, GA Stadium Crime Zone
Ed, I really appreciate your post. I work with public-safety communications almost every day and I'm always trying to learn as much as possible about 'how' law enforcement officers do their jobs. That way, I can try my best to make sure that the communications systems that I work on, work the best for what they need. Your description of what sometimes goes on in the 'work day' for a law enforcement officer, is very helpful to me.

Larry, you're making an assumption that the old analog system can be 'upgraded' to do what the county needs it to do. I don't have personal knowledge of Jackson County, but in my area, there are many counties that need better coverage than what their old analog systems can provide. To upgrade these systems to wide-area coverage would cost more money than what these counties can afford and the systems would still not be anywhere near 'perfect'. On the other hand, the newer digital technologies can be implemented for less money than what it would cost to 'upgrade' the analog systems, and these new digital technologies are superior in performance to analog.

John Rayfield, Jr. - CETma
WØPM

Exactly, you aren't from here, don't live here, have no knowledge of the needs or situation unique to this region.

But you know exactly what we need to fix it.

Yet like any salesman you have all the answers.

Typical. :roll:
 

JRayfield

Member
Joined
Jul 31, 2009
Messages
797
Location
Springfield, MO
I don't 'claim' to have been in the communications industry for 32 years - I HAVE been in the radio industry for 32 years. I'm very well known among many engineers and marketing people at Motorola, and that's only happened in the last 10 years (I've only been working with Motorola equipment for 10 years). I've spoken in seminars at IWCE, and I was just selected to be an editorial advisor for Radio Resource Mission Critical Magazine. So my knowledge/expertise in this industry isn't "self-proclaimed" - it's recognized by many in the industry. (If you want a business reference, you can ask Alan Tilles. He's one of the country's best communications attorneys (I really think he's the best, but there are probably some other good ones out there too). I've known him since about 1993.

Starting in the early 90's, I started working with many radio dealers all over the western hemisphere (not just in the U.S.) and several large end users (such as the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, the State of Washington, Puma County AZ, and Hyundai in S. Korea) to help solve coverage and interoperability problems (I developed interoperability solutions before any of us were using the word "interoperability").

Of course, as I pointed out, I don't know the specifics in Jackson County and I never indicated that I did. I did point out that in our area, we have agencies that simply can't afford P25 systems. Yet they need, desparately, something better than what they have (analog systems).

Oh, speaking of interoperabilty, there are numerous ways to achieve that now, including products from Raytheon, Motorola, Telex, and many others. The 'neatest' in my opinion is a new product that will bridge between any analog or P25 system and a MotoTRBO system, with the connection to the MotoTRBO system being done at the IP level (no over-the-air connection to the system). I'm working with the manufacturer of that one, to help develop it. Interoperability is really pretty simple, in many cases, and doesn't have to cost millions (or even thousands, in some cases).

And while I do some sales, I'm not really a 'saleman'. (Actually, I made that statement to a new customer recently, and his response was "I can tell"). I'm a tech and have done engineering (hardware design and software development). That's why I've done, and still do, consulting with communications manufacturers (working a lot with their engineers). I tend to look at things from a technical perspective, NOT necessarily from "how much money can I make off of it". Just in case you didn't know, the CETma after my name refers to an ETA-I Technician Certification, Master Level.

I didn't "dodge" any question. I thought I answered it. I apologize if I didn't make myself clear. Any agency that wants something that isn't covered by grant money, spends their own money. And that's what I tell them that they'll have to do. Simple. Nothing complicated about that.

By the way, Missouri now allows non-P25 portables and infrastructure to be purchased with federal grant money, in some cases. This type of decision is left up to the states to decide - the federal government does NOT 'mandate' that P25 equipment be purchased with federal grant money. In fact, several years ago, a gentlement from the Federal Office of Homeland Security told me (at IWCE) that the federal government can not mandate such a thing. Of course, 'rules' can always change, but that was the case at that time. And it would appear to be the case now, with Missouri's recent decision.

But speaking of 'dodging' a question - where can I find information that specifically references APCO 16 and conventional systems? APCO's website doesn't do it. It just references trunking systems (as the quote from their site showed).

Oh, and I asked you to explain what you mean by "certified for public safety use". You did not answer that. You've made similar statements again, in another post. Please tell me who 'certifies' radio equipment for public safety use.

So you don't want to tell me what you do for a living? Interesting. I don't have a problem telling people what I do.

I didn't work with Motorola radios in the 1980's. So I'm not familiar with "Stat-Alert" or some of the other trademarked acronyms that Motorola has used over the years. Of course, MDC1200 is still 'current', so I'm very familiar with that one. Since APCO 16 was a 'feature set' geared towards public safety trunking, and I didn't work with public-safety trunking in the 1980's, then I had to do a bit of research on that. And I'm always willing to do research on something. No one can know everything and that's how I keep learning - I ask questions and I do research. It's just that there's not much call for information on APCO 16 these days, so I hadn't spent any time learning much about it.

Oh, as to MDC (or MDT's or MCT's - whichever you want to call them), I've worked with DataRadio systems for quite a few years, including supporting the system for the city here. So I'm very familiar with mobile data systems. In fact, I've worked with 'packet radio' (which is what DataRadio systems are) since the mid-1980's.

I never said that OpenSky is good. I started hearing of problems with OpenSky 5 years ago, from another dealer when I went to VoIP training at Telex in Lincoln NE. From what I've read lately, nothing much has changed - it still doesn't sound like OpenSky works very good.

On the other hand, MotoTRBO has proven itself. It works VERY well. So there's no way that you can honestly compare those two 'systems' with each other, with regards to 'performance'.

By the way, not everyone is going P25 (or Astro 25). There are more and more rural counties and small agencies that are using MotoTRBO or NexEdge.

And MotoTRBO is NOT 'proprietary'. Hytera has released a DMR/MotoTRBO compatible radio and other manufacturers are following (Tait and Vertex). MotoTRBO is no more 'proprietary' than Astro 25. MotoTRBO is based on DMR, which is an open standard, just as P25 is an open standard. MotoTRBO does include some features that are 'proprietary', just as Astro 25 includes some proprietary features.

Many of these counties need wide-area coverage. That can NOT be achieved with conventional P25, without putting in expensive simulcast/voted-receiver systems (or requiring the users to switch channels on their radios as they move from one area of the county to another). And P25 trunked systems are even more expensive. Those are facts. And there just isn't enough money available (from grants or taxes) for the smaller-population rural counties to do this. And that's another fact. Ideally, yes, everyone could get the money they need to buy what they need. But that's just not the situation in many cases. And to stay with their analog systems (narrowband or not) can literally be 'suicide' for some public-safety personnel.

John Rayfield, Jr. - CETma


I find it interesting that a self-proclaimed veteran of a business that sells to public safety didn't even know what APCO 16 feature sets were. You claim to have been in the radio business for how long? Can you tell me what the STAT-ALERT feature set is availble on Motorola conventional radios since the late 1980's is? What is MDC1200, MODAT, etc? What features exist in Project 25 conventional radio systems that mimic or enhance Project 16?
That ought to keep you Googling for a while. What is an MDC terminal used for?

I am not going to get into what I do for a living. People that know me know what I do, where I work, and my reputation speaks for itself.

The bottom line is MotoTRBO, OpenSKY and other such systems ARE NOT designed for public safety use.

Since you dodged one major issue, I'll raise it again and see what your response is. MotoTRBO does NOT qualify for Federal SAFECOM grant money, nor does NXDN, or OpenSky. So what answer do you give government agencies when they ask about applying for grant money to buy these systems?

And OpenSKY is so great? Please, have you watched this video?YouTube - Milwaukee Fire Department Local 215 Representative concerned about new radio system

How many millions of taxpayers get wasted on junk like OpenSKY, with NO FEDERAL MONEY and still Milwaukee hasn't gotten what they've paid for?

(at least the county I live and work in got some SAFECOM money- but then they bought an P25 compliant solution not some business radio crap. And at least we'll be able to link in to the one day promised region wide P25 700/800 system.)

Where will Jackson county be in 5 years when they are done paying off this stuff? Exactly where they are now, isolated. Everyone else is going Astro 25. Would not a more prudent and cost effective solution be in the short term, narrowband existing VHF analog and apply for Federal grant money and pass a SPLOST and buy what they really want and need?
 

MTS2000des

5B2_BEE00 Czar
Joined
Jul 12, 2008
Messages
5,842
Location
Cobb County, GA Stadium Crime Zone
John,

If you're a member of APCO, you can get all the white papers on every project including 16.

This thread is not about what I, you or anyone else does for a living. I have no reason to disperse who I work for, what I do- again, it isn't what we are discussing.

It is about Jackson county, GA buying a trunked radio system that is NOT designed or certified for public safety (e.g. passed the APCO 25 compliance process, again, if you are in the business you are familiar with this initiative), and a system that is incompatible with neighboring agencies current and most likely future radio system upgrades.

It is about Jackson county buying and implementing a very expensive system that in 5 years, will prove to be a colossal failure. It is about Jackson county shutting off any hope of Federal funding for such radio systems now and in the future, as the system they were sold is NOT approved for grant funding. It is about Jackson county public safety entrusting their life safety radio systems to a vendor who is selling them something not designed or intended for such use.

Since you like to write paragraphs, answer the following:

1-Does MotoTRBO offer priority talkgroup access to public safety standards?

2-Does MotoTRBO offer emergency call with live mike, and user preemption when all available RF and backhaul resources are in use?

3-What level of redundancy does the MotoTRBO controller/infrastructure have?

4-Are any subscriber radios capable of operating in fireground areas on simplex analog, which the USFA recommends? Are these subscriber radios capable of surviving fireground conditions without failure (specifically exposure to high temperature, immersion, etc.)

5-Are features such as Motorola's fireground accountability available on MotoTRBO?

6-What encryption algorithms are supported?

7-What are the maximum number of talkgroups per site?

8-Is MotoTRBO capable of simulcast operation, if so, how is this implemented?

9-How does the vocoder/DSP respond to use in high noise conditions? How does it handle simultaneous transmissions (doubling)?

10-How secure is access to the system? (please, I can't wait to hear this. I've heard so many wonderful things about people able to pirate on MotoTRBO conventional repeaters with nothing more than a copy of CPS and 20 dollar made in China cables from Ebay)

11- (related to 10), does MotoTRBO offer advanced system key support, or is any system key or authentication used for validation and to prevent unauthorized programming or reprogramming of radios? (please don't tell me codeplug passwords. Any 12 year old with a hex editor can circumvent that)

That should keep you busy for hours.

I'll sum it up with a simple explanation and leave the tech rhetoric for Batlabs or MTUG.

Life safety radio systems are overpriced. But they are for a reason. No different than vehicles, uniforms, weapons, or anything else we use in the performance of duty. Cutting cost and replacing a Crown Victoria with a Ford Fusion is the equivalent of using MotoTRBO in place of a real, bona-fide, designed for life safety radio network.

Would YOU want your PD, FD and EMS relying on something not designed to properly address their needs? I didn't think you did.
 
Last edited:

MTS2000des

5B2_BEE00 Czar
Joined
Jul 12, 2008
Messages
5,842
Location
Cobb County, GA Stadium Crime Zone
sorry, had to respond.

When I made reference to MDC, I meant MDC1200- part of the STAT-ALERT signaling package offered by Motorola on products such as the Saber analog, Spectra analog, Syntor X 9000 and Centracom II consoles.

Stat-Alert added Project 16 features to conventional systems, and is still widely used today on legacy conventional analog systems. Unit ID with Emergency call with channel steering (the equivalent of emergency call on a TRS where a user's radio automatically tunes to a dedicated emergency call channel), and pre-emption (activating an MDC emergency call temporarily inhibits other radios on the channel until the dispatcher acknowledges it), and open mike (allowing a dispatcher to hear audio from the unit in distress) are all features available on every Stat-Alert equipped Motorola conventional radio since the 1980's.

All of these features are widely available and more on current analog systems. Narrowbanding a system like Jackson county's VHF and adding a few extra channels is certainly cheaper than buying something like MotoTRBO. Not to mention, if they bought P25 capable radios from any number of vendors, they could actually get the Feds to pay for much of it.
Then spend the next 5 years with a long term plan to raise the needed money to build the sites and go with a more appropriate solution like extended the Hall county Astro 25 DTRS, which will put them much closer to being interoperable with what everyone else is doing. And again, unlike MotoTRBO, they can get "the government to pay for it" (so says Matthew Lesko).

So what is the advantage of MotoTRBO?
And HYT? Ha ha, I wouldn't give those pieces of crap to a mall security guard let alone someone who's life depends on their radio to work.
Do the citizens of Jackson county deserve better? I say so. Fire the people who didn't do their research. The men and women who put their lives on the line deserve the best money can buy to do their jobs.

They already are underpaid and overworked. This kind of nonsense is a slap in their faces.
 

JRayfield

Member
Joined
Jul 31, 2009
Messages
797
Location
Springfield, MO
What we do, and what we've done, can have a lot to do with what we're discussing. My background is commercial communications, from a technical standpoint, for the last 32 years. My reputation in the communications industry shows that others recognize that I know something of this subject. That has a LOT to do with much of what you've brought up in this discussion, since you've implied (virtually accused) me of not knowing much about this subject.

Yes, I'm familiar with the new P25 compliance program, 'designed' to make sure that P25 radios from different manufacturers are 'compatible' with each other. It has nothing to do with 'certifying' that a radio is good for public safety. If that was the case, then NO analog radio would be considered as 'good' for public safety, including all of the thousands (millions?) of conventional analog radios that being used in public safety systems. Obviously, a system that has the features that P25 offers is much better than analog systems, for some users, but that doesn't mean that everyone must have P25 or they aren't using a 'mission critical' radio system.

By the way, Motorola (the company) is promoting MotoTRBO for rural public safety use. They've just recently released a Use Case Study on a countywide system in GA. These Use Case Studies are for marketing purposes.

Here's the answers to the questions:

1-Does MotoTRBO offer priority talkgroup access to public safety standards?

Not at this time. Neither does a conventional analog repeater system.

2-Does MotoTRBO offer emergency call with live mike, and user preemption when all available RF and backhaul resources are in use?

Yes, in some system configurations.

3-What level of redundancy does the MotoTRBO controller/infrastructure have?

MotoTRBO is a 'distributed logic' system. In most cases, a single controller doesn't exist. So there is no need for redundancy. If one repeater in a trunked system fails, the system just continues working without that repeater. In an IP Site Connect system, if a repeater fails, then the rest of the sites continue to work 'as normal'. Really no different, in this case, than a conventional analog repeater system, except that the mobiles/portables in an IP Site Connect system continue to 'roam' onto the sites that are still on the air, with no operator intervention. MotoTRBO does support redundant 'hot standby' repeaters in some system configurations.

4-Are any subscriber radios capable of operating in fireground areas on simplex analog, which the USFA recommends? Are these subscriber radios capable of surviving fireground conditions without failure (specifically exposure to high temperature, immersion, etc.)

Yes. XPR-series portables are submersible up to 1 meter for 30 minutes. They meet the same Mil-Spec standards as other Motorola Professional-Series radios meet (radios that have been used for years in 'mission critical' applications, including fire service). Also, these same radios are Intrinsically Safe (Factory Mutual) if ordered with a FM-approved battery pack (a $50 list price option).

5-Are features such as Motorola's fireground accountability available on MotoTRBO?

No, not at this time, but that's a really good idea. The information from Motorola that I have, is that this 'feature' is only available on the XTS5000-series radio. Does that mean that the XTS-1500 and XTS-2500 aren't designed for mission critical operation?

6-What encryption algorithms are supported?

At this time, a proprietary 40 bit digital encryption. Granted, this isn't as high as some public safety users might want, or need, and for those users, they need to use P25. But, for many users, 40 bit digital encryption is at least as secure, and in some case much more secure, than what they're currently using on their analog systems (if they're using any encryption/scrambling at all).

7-What are the maximum number of talkgroups per site?

I gather we're talking about trunking here. Actually, you can have 'talkgroups' on conventional MotoTRBO systems, too. I think it's 250 per repeater on Capacity Plus trunking, but on conventional, it's up in the thousands (I can't remember exactly).

8-Is MotoTRBO capable of simulcast operation, if so, how is this implemented?

Yes, a company in Europe has developed a simulcast system for use with MotoTRBO/DMR. I don't know exacty how it's implemented. It was used at the G8 Summit in Italy earlier this year for security communications (they used Tetra and MotoTRBO/DMR).

9-How does the vocoder/DSP respond to use in high noise conditions? How does it handle simultaneous transmissions (doubling)?

MotoTRBO performs MUCH better with high background noise as compared to most P25 or analog radios. The only radio that I've seen that works as good, or better, is Motorola's new APX-7000. As to 'doubling', I'm not sure. I haven't tried that. But I will. I've heard of problems with P25 when this happens. It would definitely be interesting to compare MotoTRBO in this regard.

10-How secure is access to the system? (please, I can't wait to hear this. I've heard so many wonderful things about people able to pirate on MotoTRBO conventional repeaters with nothing more than a copy of CPS and 20 dollar made in China cables from Ebay)

The repeaters themselve do not have any 'access control' system. Of course, this is no different than a conventional analog repeater. An 'access control system' is available from a third-party MotoTRBO developer. I guess those who have been 'pirated' need to purchase an access control system (sales hat on - I can sell it to them.....sales hat off <G>).

11- (related to 10), does MotoTRBO offer advanced system key support, or is any system key or authentication used for validation and to prevent unauthorized programming or reprogramming of radios? (please don't tell me codeplug passwords. Any 12 year old with a hex editor can circumvent that)

No keys necessary at this time. Just like conventional analog systems. But with access control, no one can put a new radio on the system without it showing up (every radio has to have a unique ID on the system). And I do really doubt that any 12 year old with a hex editor can circumvent the codeplug password protection in the latest firmware/software (but then, there's a first time for everything <G>).

"That should keep you busy for hours."

Not too bad. :) You'll notice that I said, several times, "not at this time", in my answers. The reason is that MotoTRBO is still 'emerging'. New features/functions are being added every 6 months or so (feature updates twice a year). So while a particular feature may not be available today, it may be in the future. Motorola has a 'roadmap' that lists out the features that will be added to MotoTRBO. This 'roadmap' can extend for several years into the future. They don't tell anyone what some of these features will be until close to when they're released.

"I'll sum it up with a simple explanation and leave the tech rhetoric for Batlabs or MTUG. "

But that's what a lot of this is all about - the technical aspects, differences, etc. of the different systems.

"Would YOU want your PD, FD and EMS relying on something not designed to properly address their needs? I didn't think you did."

You're right - I wouldn't. That's why rural agencies are looking for something that they can afford, to replace their 'crummy' analog systems as soon as possible, before someone gets hurt.

John Rayfield, Jr. - CETma
 

JRayfield

Member
Joined
Jul 31, 2009
Messages
797
Location
Springfield, MO
As you pointed out (and I had already pointed out), I don't have knowledge of the specifics in Jackson County. Maybe you're right about that county - maybe they should wait for 5 years and then put in a wide-area P25 trunked system. But you're trying to make P25 'fit' everyone, in all circumstances. And that just doesn't work (as much as anyone would like it to work).

Just 'adding channels' to an existing analog system is not a good solution in many cases. The users just have to deal with more channels on their radios, making sure that they're on the right channel for a given area of coverage. That can get 'messy'.

And adding MDC-1200 and other such 'functionality' obviously isn't going to solve coverage problems.

By the way, MotoTRBO radios cost less than comparable-tiered analog-only radios, such as the HT-series and CDM-series radios.

John Rayfield, Jr.
 

MTS2000des

5B2_BEE00 Czar
Joined
Jul 12, 2008
Messages
5,842
Location
Cobb County, GA Stadium Crime Zone
So, all the technical huberis and self-promotion aside, you agree that:

1-MotoTRBO isn't ready for public safety as P25 at least is.

2-MotoTRBO doesn't offer support for public safety industry standard encryption, (DES, DES-XL, DES-OFB, AES, etc).

3-MotoTRBO doesn't offer secured authenticated access in conventional or trunking configuration, no system key support, no support for inhibiting rogue radios or preventing unauthorized users from accessing a conventional MotoTRBO repeater (it has been done with ease).

4-No APCO 16 compliant emergency, regrouping or preemption management really exist.

5-MotoTRBO does not officially support simulcast operation.

6-No multiband MotoTRBO subscriber radios currently exist.

7-No fireground accountability software support on the MotoTRBO platform..

8-Distributed logic: aka LTR. Nice, the absolute LAST thing you want in a PS radio system. Why did EFJ give up on MultiNet? Because you can't fit a square peg in a round hole.

Like many salesman, the "not at this time" keeps emerging. So Jackson county pays for this system today, what will they be spending in 5 years to get those promised features? If that is the case, you just confirmed why they should wait, secure funding and grants for a proper P25 network, and revisit the idea then. And spend minimally to bring their VHF analog system to narrowband compliance. They should keep it around after they go to their new system anyway, as a backup. Why not, it's paid for? One should never put all their eggs in one basket.

It's been fun John. Thanks for confirming what we already knew, Motorola is making another flopper mistake pushing this business radio stuff on public safety. Didn't they learn from Privacy Plus? So many PP 800 systems got sold, and so many PS customers found out how dangerous these systems are. And APCO-16 was born (then Ma M introduces Smartnet I).

If they want to get business from "rural" public safety and not screw them over with systems and hardware that aren't appropriate and avoid lawsuits and bad press down the road, maybe they should get off their high horse with Astro 25. It's a great system, but not perfect either. and way overpriced. But at least we can get some Fed money to offset the ASTROnomical cost. And most importantly, its pretty solid technology with some exceptions, but certainly more fitting for the task than some business radio systems.

As someone asked a while back:

Where do you think public safety radio will be in 10 years?

The answer:

Exactly where it is now. Overpriced and under performing.
 
Last edited:

JRayfield

Member
Joined
Jul 31, 2009
Messages
797
Location
Springfield, MO
First of all, my explaining my background and what I've done (and continue to do) has nothing to do with arrogance. You told me that I was 'wrong' on something that I am correct on (that APCO 16 dealt with analog trunking, NOT conventional systems) and that led into you questioning whether I was even really in the communications industry or not. I would not have said anything about my background, technical expertise, or anything else like that, if you had not made unfounded and insulting accusations that are untrue.

Some of your statements about MotoTRBO are incorrect, you having ignored what I posted. For example, your statements that "MotoTRBO doesn't offer secured authenticated access in conventional or trunking configuration" and "no support for inhibiting rogue radios or preventing unauthorized users from accessing a conventional MotoTRBO repeater" are NOT true.

John
 
Last edited:

MTS2000des

5B2_BEE00 Czar
Joined
Jul 12, 2008
Messages
5,842
Location
Cobb County, GA Stadium Crime Zone
First of all, my explaining my background and what I've done (and continue to do) has nothing to do with arrogance. You told me that I was 'wrong' on something that I am correct on (that APCO 16 dealt with analog trunking, NOT conventional systems) and that led into you questioning whether I was even really in the communications industry or not. I would not have said anything about my background, technical expertise, or anything else like that, if you had not made unfounded and insulting accusations that are untrue.

Some of your statements about MotoTRBO are incorrect, you having ignored what I posted. For example, your statements that "MotoTRBO doesn't offer secured authenticated access in conventional or trunking configuration" and "no support for inhibiting rogue radios or preventing unauthorized users from accessing a conventional MotoTRBO repeater" are NOT true.

John

John,

Show me where I questioned your being in the business. If you read your own posts, YOU were the one who volunteered this into the discussion, toting your "expertise" and "experience".

I was debating the facts, and am not interested in what you, or anyone else does for a living as these are deflection sidebar attempts. But since YOU brought it up, I thought it was fair game.

And you said yourself MotoTRBO does not offer ASK support, or use system keys, and in fact is as easy as programming a conventional radio using the correct CTCSS/DCS tones if one knows the correct frequency. Which is in fact, the case. How do I know this? I know personally of two MotoTRBO repeaters (LMR/BMR NOT ham) that are suffering from pirates who were able to do just as you said: program up an XPR with pirated copies of CPS and cheap Ebay cables and yak away.

And this is the system Jackson county should rely upon and spend hundreds of thousands of dollars to go to?

It doesn't support industry standard encryption. It doesn't do anything but line pockets of those trying to push it. It isn't what is needed here and Motorola and it's dealers are doing a major disservice pushing this stuff when the State of Georgia and many metro areas (Jackson county falls just outside the Atlanta UASI) are in the process of building out a viable 700/800MHz Astro 25 DTRS.

MotoTURDO is not compatible with this, and never will be. Tell me again why we should waste our money on this again?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top