Fleetmaps are always being allocated and un-allocated Fleetmaps are dynamic and mean nothing unless deployed in real-time. , it only takes a few keystrokes to edit them.Also, keep in mind that they already have allocated their talkgroup ID's for LACOFD. Its going to happen. Its already been allocated for their fleetmap
The biggest problem with early fleetmaps is bloat.
I know of a few very small California cities that have more assigned talkgroups for various city departments ,then they have actual employees or radios.
Follow the money...
I would suggest you look at the RFP's and other budget documents to see what is actually paid for and funded at this point. That's the only way you really know what is planned for. All the design and budget documents are public records, and anyone can request to see them via the California Public Records act...but most it's all posted on-line if you have time to look, and know how to de-cipher the docs.
L.A County is broke ...and public safety is not a giant priority for the Board of Supervisors.
There is no reason to rip out the existing analog legacy system as it's pretty robust and cost a lot less to maintain.
It's also mutual aid friendly. You also want to avoid the TRS crashing during a huge event where the cops and fire folks are fighting for open talkgroups.
Let the cops use LARICS during SHTF situations, the FD is fine on analog/conventional in LA.
What funds are approved AND allocated at this point?
Nothing else matters but the money.
Scan Sexy...
But ya gotta pay first.