New Jersey Interoperability Communication System (NJICS)

Status
Not open for further replies.

nosoup4u

Member
Feed Provider
Joined
Jan 30, 2002
Messages
2,191
Location
High Bridge, NJ
I went through my logs from yesterday and found another TG. 4141. The 2 radios that affiliated have not affiliated on the NJSP system (at least on Troop B). There is an adjacent radio ID on the NJSP system that looks like its been used for testing.
 

elias1988

Active Member
Feed Provider
Joined
Nov 20, 2003
Messages
2,044
Location
West Creek,NJ
One way I think for IDing these crew channels is to listen for unit number,I heard a 38 unit come up on 3093 so that may be Crew 38 for Central.
 

nosoup4u

Member
Feed Provider
Joined
Jan 30, 2002
Messages
2,191
Location
High Bridge, NJ
4141 is Remu 1. I caught a couple guys on it last night between 5-6 last night.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 

nosoup4u

Member
Feed Provider
Joined
Jan 30, 2002
Messages
2,191
Location
High Bridge, NJ
Correction, Remu 1 is 4131. It would appear from yesterdays log that 4141 is REMU 2.
 
Last edited:

N2ICV

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 14, 2002
Messages
590
Location
Gloucester County FM29in
Site-105

I have added to the wiki and submited this to the Database
Site-105
769.19375 Data
769.96875 Alternate Control Channel
770.44375 Alternate Control Channel
774.04375 Alternate Control Channel
774.56875 Control Channel

From Pro96Com V1.10.5 Build 187
@ 12:25pm 12/9/2011

1st time I have ever picked up this site. Now if I can find where it is?
 

elias1988

Active Member
Feed Provider
Joined
Nov 20, 2003
Messages
2,044
Location
West Creek,NJ
It looks like I may have picked up the first TDMA frequency for site-103 at 4:53 this morning,762.14375/1 no voice just private data. Radio ID was 16564225
 
Last edited:

rr60

Active Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2005
Messages
1,902
New Site 0122?

I have been seeing 039Ah-0122 on 770.9562 for several days.

Weak but steady.

I do not see this on the Wiki or this thread, is this new?

Anyone?
 

rr60

Active Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2005
Messages
1,902
Location

I have been seeing 039Ah-0122 on 770.9562 for several days.

Weak but steady.

I do not see this on the Wiki or this thread, is this new?

Anyone?
Where do you live?

The question to where Iive might be better answered with this:

I am in Somerset, Unon County area. With Diamond Discone and 1/2" hardline, Antenna is 35 AGL and my elevation is 400MSL.

I hear from Monmouth to Bergen to NYC to Morris,Hunterdon, Warren and Mercer Counties.

Anyway,Site 122 appears to be new and is simulcasting the North System.
 

elias1988

Active Member
Feed Provider
Joined
Nov 20, 2003
Messages
2,044
Location
West Creek,NJ
More testing heard this time on 4139,they it called the "Fairfield channel"


Also I did some traveling on Interstate 195 today and i noticed the patrol area signs were changed to Safety Service Patrol from Emergency Service Patrol,I did some searching and sure enough they renamed it during the first quarter of this year. I saw 3 patrol trucks only one had a unit number on it (7529). http://www.safehighways.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/NJDOT_SSPCoverage.pdf
 
Last edited:

W2SJW

Senior Member
Database Admin
Joined
Nov 22, 2001
Messages
3,265
Location
Northwest NJ
The Fairfield thing is to be expected, as the state plans on having 3rd-party agencies that wish to use the state network operate over here once the system is complete.

I'm pretty sure the system will be able to fully handle simultaneous FDMA & TDMA traffic based on the end-user's radios.
 

W2GLD

Active Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
May 20, 2003
Messages
608
Location
Michigan
I have processed numerous site updates today; as a reminder, if any of you have run Pro96Com on a site and can forward this information to me, I can add it to the database as well. Also, if any of you have confirmed the approximate site locations with the corresponding frequencies; please let me know and I can cross-reference the actual towers location and update the database as well.

Thanks,

Jerry - W2GLD
 

W2GLD

Active Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
May 20, 2003
Messages
608
Location
Michigan
The Fairfield thing is to be expected, as the state plans on having 3rd-party agencies that wish to use the state network operate over here once the system is complete.

I'm pretty sure the system will be able to fully handle simultaneous FDMA & TDMA traffic based on the end-user's radios.

Scott and other; yes these sites will all process FDMA & TDMA accordingly, at least for a while until all the older radios get replaced; though not likely to change for at least three years.
 

rr60

Active Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2005
Messages
1,902
Database Suggestion

I have processed numerous site updates today; as a reminder, if any of you have run Pro96Com on a site and can forward this information to me, I can add it to the database as well. Also, if any of you have confirmed the approximate site locations with the corresponding frequencies; please let me know and I can cross-reference the actual towers location and update the database as well.

Thanks,

Jerry - W2GLD

I would suggest the database reflect what is shown for the 800 MHZ system.

For example we know that 039Ah-0101 CC 774.78125 is North Simulcast Statewide (that is how the database reflects the 800 system) why not keep it the same? So we would have Central and South Simulcast Statewide.

Also Site 039Ah-0122 CC 770.9625 needs to be added. I have no other info on this, but it is on the air.

Just a thought.
 

W2GLD

Active Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
May 20, 2003
Messages
608
Location
Michigan
I would suggest the database reflect what is shown for the 800 MHZ system.

For example we know that 039Ah-0101 CC 774.78125 is North Simulcast Statewide (that is how the database reflects the 800 system) why not keep it the same? So we would have Central and South Simulcast Statewide.

Also Site 039Ah-0122 CC 770.9625 needs to be added. I have no other info on this, but it is on the air.

Just a thought.

The reason the system is setup different than the 800 system is because this is one large Project-25 statewide system, sharing the same system ID throughout multiple sites statewide.

In the case of the original NJSP 800 system, they have three unique system ID's which have been tied together; therefore creating three simulcast systems with roaming; completely different than a traditional Project-25 system.

I should note that both systems will eventually be running the 7.11 platform and the 800 system will soon take on this type of setup. For a better example of what NJ 's system will eventually look like, see Michigan's MPSCS System.

As for adding this additional site, do you have the Pro96Com log file or further information on the site for confirmation on it existence?

Thanks and happy monitoring...
 

CqDx

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
May 15, 2003
Messages
1,245
Location
US
TGID 1761 sounds like Hudson County LERN channel. I heard Secaucus PD, Weekhawken PD with BOLO alerts. On the Pro96Com it shows all different RIDs so most likely it's not patched.
 

elias1988

Active Member
Feed Provider
Joined
Nov 20, 2003
Messages
2,044
Location
West Creek,NJ
Do you mean 1767? I show that active after 6:30 nothing for 1761....Last time I checked 1767 was a simulcast,not sure if things have changed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top