But how did she use that?
Look at the first post in this thread.
But how did she use that?
That's how.But how did she use that?
Ohhhhhhhh OK....Look at the first post in this thread.
Ohhhhhhhh OK....
Got it.... Took a couple of screen shots of it too
As an average Joe, that picture of her posing with what appears to me like a Wendy's fast food chain and the name "Whistler Wendy" around it, sure does resemble the Wendy's trademarked logo. But hey what do I know about right or wrong!https://forums.radioreference.com/a...first-impressions-20160520_143205_resized.jpg
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Not sure if English is your native language. By that I mean you speak, write, and UNDERSTAND the English language..... But people are only blaming Whistler for coming up with a "kill switch" that is ONLY activated by installing a software modification on it. They could've easily asked the creators of that software to cease, end project and remove it from the internet. From there Whistler could've just easily carried on with business. But instead they decided to be "malicious" with intent to cripple the Radio Shack Pro 668 scanner. A scanner that Whistler NEVER cared to touch. By touch, I mean develop updates for it. We begged for Whistler to extend DMR to the 668 before this modification was made available. They didn't care. Low and behold, the modification appears and now all of the sudden. They now care about developing DMR for it. I'm not a betting person, but I would venture to say that they reversed engineer the creator of the tool. Creating there own version for the 668.Unbelievable that people that used hacked firmware have the gall to act like it is Whistler fault for the issue that someone other then Whistler created, by using hacked firmware.
Maybe they will do something to help the people that have locked firmware, just give them a chance.
Just my opinion
Wait are these hacked scanners now bricked or just impossible to upgrade to DMR?
That's a huge difference.
I understood Eric had effectively stated that further updates with newer firmware would not work and that he would not be making them work.
Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk
Wait are these hacked scanners now bricked or just impossible to upgrade to DMR?
That's a huge difference.
I understood Eric had effectively stated that further updates with newer firmware would not work and that he would not be making them work.
Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk
Wait are these hacked scanners now bricked or just impossible to upgrade to DMR?
That's a huge difference.
I understood Eric had effectively stated that further updates with newer firmware would not work and that he would not be making them work.
Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk
Whistler has a disclaimer/warning about using firmware on a non Whistler radio posted for the Firmware and DSP on the download pages.
**IMPORTANT**
This software is intended for use with Whistler brand products only. Attempting to update any other brand of scanner with Whistler software/firmware may cause the scanner to stop functioning.
So basically people ignored this, did it anyways and are going to complain. Unless Whistler put this up after the fact. Which I cannot verify, but if it has always been there, I say you are out of luck and it is your own fault. Unless I am missing something here, which I could be. Seems there is more to this story that someone is leaving out.
You seem to be missing the fact that Whistler deliberately crippled scanners and went so far as to add a time delay in order to damage as many units as possible.Unless I am missing something here, which I could be. Seems there is more to this story that someone is leaving out.