PA State Police Struggle with OpenSky Issues

Status
Not open for further replies.

kirkwoodcr

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Aug 30, 2010
Messages
72
Location
Beaver County, PA
Around Beaver County, they use Tac-2 mostly for their traps or 'catepillar'. Admin 1 still is active with the morse code ident.
Yes, they can use the OpenSky to access jNet and MVRs.
 

kirkwoodcr

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Aug 30, 2010
Messages
72
Location
Beaver County, PA
Kirkwood, what do you mean by catepillar. Never heard that term used.

More often seen on I-79, basically it's a trap setup where they line up one or more trooper cars on an on-ramp, and a dummy vehicle or chopper is positioned down the road measuring speed and spotting other violations. Dummy vehicle spots a violator and radios to the next car in line. "White car, 88.6 left lane, passing red car doing 75.6." They will decide to go after one or both.

The best example I recall was I-79 south right at Carnegie where they position 5 cars on the on-ramp and have a 'beat-up' pickup truck on the overpass ahead of the exit appearing to be broken down or abandoned.
Related article: http://www.wtae.com/news/23290206/detail.html

I'm not sure if that's the official name of the program, but I do recall seeing that name mentioned on the news. I cannot locate an article at this time.
 
Last edited:

iamhere300

Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2004
Messages
1,346
Location
Chappell Hill TX
So, to read this... PSP Commissioner Frank Noonan admits the open sky system does not work well for the PSP, and they need a backup to the fancy new system.

So, they are going to narrowband their VHF, replace 51 repeaters, 80 base stations, and 2500 mobiles. All because their 800 Mhz system does not perform as they were told it would.

And they want the FCC to give them a waiver of time to do it in.

The only other insult to injury they could do is to buy the new equipment from the same manufacturer as the open sky system...

http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7021755411
 

kirkwoodcr

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Aug 30, 2010
Messages
72
Location
Beaver County, PA
So, to read this... PSP Commissioner Frank Noonan admits the open sky system does not work well for the PSP, and they need a backup to the fancy new system.

So, they are going to narrowband their VHF, replace 51 repeaters, 80 base stations, and 2500 mobiles. All because their 800 Mhz system does not perform as they were told it would.

And they want the FCC to give them a waiver of time to do it in.

The only other insult to injury they could do is to buy the new equipment from the same manufacturer as the open sky system...
http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7021755411

Probably explains why I heard a lot of traffic on channel D and some complaints on there talking about how they can't hear anyone or run mvr checks.
 

spencer05

Member
Joined
Aug 5, 2007
Messages
5
Location
Mountaintop Penna
I don't know if anyone else has noticed this, but in the last several weeks I have noticed a decent amount of traffic on the VHF here in my area. Most notably the Milton and Selinsgrove barracks along with Frackville. I placed all the VHF channels in 1 of my radios just to take up some empty space. Surprised that stone silence has gone to several hits a day. Even the Hazleton, Shickshinny, Bloomsburg and Fern Ridge have popped up more than usual. Don't usually here anything on the TAC channels being I am only 1/2 mile from I-81 area. Don't know what the deal is with the new system or whats up. I do more reading on the site than posting and just thought I would see if anyone else has noticed this. I think they correct term should be a" Reliable System" not a back up considering the traffic being passed. Only my thoughts!
 

RogerH11

Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2008
Messages
146
Location
16866
The most effective way to get to the bottom of who/why the decison was made to go with Open Sky is to have the State Auditor General do a "performance" audit.
Why?
Ma/Com was asked in the "bidding" process to put down----3----systems that were operational. They used Fed Ex TWICE and the Orange County California transit system. The OCC was NOT operational when the document was signed. In fact the radios were NOT installed at the tme!

This is correct! OS didn't have a working public safety system in the country let alone doing a massive project like a statewide radio system which saying was completely nuts is an under statement. The only reason they did this is because the PA gov likes to be secretive and work in the dark. The only selling part that was needed was the public can't monitor them. Nothing else matters. If they go with an OS 2 then that is beyond criminal.
 

GTO_04

Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2004
Messages
1,939
Location
Noblesville, IN
More often seen on I-79, basically it's a trap setup where they line up one or more trooper cars on an on-ramp, and a dummy vehicle or chopper is positioned down the road measuring speed and spotting other violations. Dummy vehicle spots a violator and radios to the next car in line. "White car, 88.6 left lane, passing red car doing 75.6." They will decide to go after one or both.

The best example I recall was I-79 south right at Carnegie where they position 5 cars on the on-ramp and have a 'beat-up' pickup truck on the overpass ahead of the exit appearing to be broken down or abandoned.
Related article: I-79 Speed Trap Catches More Than 100 At 80 MPH Plus - Pittsburgh News Story - WTAE Pittsburgh

I'm not sure if that's the official name of the program, but I do recall seeing that name mentioned on the news. I cannot locate an article at this time.

Is that a VASCAR trap, or were they using radar?

GTO_04
 
Last edited:

kirkwoodcr

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Aug 30, 2010
Messages
72
Location
Beaver County, PA
Depends, sometimes they even will pace and follow. Other times an aircraft is used. Keep listening to the news this summer, they always have a piece on it.
 

phillydjdan

Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2011
Messages
2,075
I would be willing to bet that 99% of the time they use radar. The state police are allowed to use it, and they do OFTEN. Vascar is primarily used by the local municipalities, since they are not allowed to use radar (last time I checked, anyway).
 

soberbyker

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 13, 2011
Messages
467
Location
Delaware County, PA
if they switch back to the vhf system does anyone know what group or frequency philly and media barracks use along with the blue route and i76 in philly

Back before OpenSky disptach was on one channel and the cars were on another.

And if I remember correctly,

For Philly it was:

155.67000 Dispatch
155.91000 Mobiles

For DELCO it was:

155.50500 Dispatch
155.85000 Mobiles

Throughout the state:

154.75500 was car to car.



.
 

jjimenez01

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 21, 2009
Messages
69
Location
Royersford, PA
The FCC document posted by another member earlier this week listed the proposed VHF plan if approved by the FCC. The plan details VHF repeaters being scattered across the state. The only one listed for the Philadelphia metro area was on the tower behind Troop K on Belmont Ave. The next closest repeater was up in Bucks County.

JJ
 

vinzep491

Member
Joined
May 5, 2009
Messages
979
The FCC document posted by another member earlier this week listed the proposed VHF plan if approved by the FCC. The plan details VHF repeaters being scattered across the state. The only one listed for the Philadelphia metro area was on the tower behind Troop K on Belmont Ave. The next closest repeater was up in Bucks County.

JJ

Where can I find a link to this... was this for a back up system or some broader purpose?
 

jjimenez01

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 21, 2009
Messages
69
Location
Royersford, PA
http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7021755411

The plan sounds like they want to use VHF repeaters to fill in coverage gaps and use it as a back-up system during periods when the OpenSky Network is down...

"Replacing the legacy VHF system on a one-for-one basis with narrowband equipment would be cost-prohibitive. Accordingly, PSP and OPRS jointly chose to pursue a VHF repeater system, minimizing initial expenditures, using newer PA-STARNET infrastructure that can be expanded (if needed) after initial narrowbanding.
New VHF narrowband analog repeaters will provide a critical layer of redundancy for PA-STARNET and PSP. VHF narrowband repeaters and mobile radios will provide improved off-network coverage, additional coverage in rural areas where 800 MHz is terrain limited, additional interoperability using shared VHF frequencies, and allow for back-up communications during obtrusive maintenance windows required by telecommunication networks. Analog VHF is the most cost-effective means to fill coverage gaps and provide redundancy required with both factors increasing overall statewide reliability of public safety communications."

JJ
 
Last edited:

GTO_04

Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2004
Messages
1,939
Location
Noblesville, IN
http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7021755411

The plan sounds like they want to use VHF repeaters to fill in coverage gaps and use it as a back-up system during periods when the OpenSky Network is down...

"Replacing the legacy VHF system on a one-for-one basis with narrowband equipment would be cost-prohibitive. Accordingly, PSP and OPRS jointly chose to pursue a VHF repeater system, minimizing initial expenditures, using newer PA-STARNET infrastructure that can be expanded (if needed) after initial narrowbanding.
New VHF narrowband analog repeaters will provide a critical layer of redundancy for PA-STARNET and PSP. VHF narrowband repeaters and mobile radios will provide improved off-network coverage, additional coverage in rural areas where 800 MHz is terrain limited, additional interoperability using shared VHF frequencies, and allow for back-up communications during obtrusive maintenance windows required by telecommunication networks. Analog VHF is the most cost-effective means to fill coverage gaps and provide redundancy required with both factors increasing overall statewide reliability of public safety communications."

JJ

Well at least they finally admitted that 800 MHz is "terrain limited." That's progress I guess.
 

rrbum

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Feb 28, 2012
Messages
165
Question about psp and "opensky"

I am trying to understand this system. I would appreciate if anyone could help me with a few questions.
I guess what I am trying to figure out is if, when a patrol car is on the network and on duty is it constantly connected (similar to a cellphone call) or does it behave like a standard two-way radio system?
Basically I am curious as to what frequencies are eminating from the unit at any given time. For instance, if a patrol car comes within range of my antenna is there any way to pick it up. I understand that the modulated information is unobtainable but is there a carrier which can be detected and cause a scanner to stop on that frequency?
Thanks in advance to anyone that understands what I mean and can clear this up for me.
 

krokus

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 9, 2006
Messages
6,128
Location
Southeastern Michigan
Wirelessly posted (BlackBerry8530/5.0.0.973 Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 VendorID/105)

rrbum said:
I am trying to understand this system. I would appreciate if anyone could help me with a few questions.
I guess what I am trying to figure out is if, when a patrol car is on the network and on duty is it constantly connected (similar to a cellphone call) or does it behave like a standard two-way radio system?
Basically I am curious as to what frequencies are eminating from the unit at any given time. For instance, if a patrol car comes within range of my antenna is there any way to pick it up. I understand that the modulated information is unobtainable but is there a carrier which can be detected and cause a scanner to stop on that frequency?
Thanks in advance to anyone that understands what I mean and can clear this up for me.

I seriously doubt that there is a constant connection, as that would be very inefficient. There are some forum topics on OpenSky, which have a few details.

Yes, there would be a detectable radio transmission. You would have to scan all the available inputs, or at least the control channel input. There would be no way of knowing who is transmitting, and there would be a limited range on the unit-to-tower transmissions.
 

zerg901

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
3,725
Location
yup
rrbum - I think it usually works this way.

1. User turns on / powers up a mobile or portable radio ("field units")

2. The radio searches for and finds the strongest control channel

3. The radio sends a data burst which says - "this is my ID - I want to operate on Talkgroup XXX"

4. If the radio has a scanning option, then it would include in the data burst - "I also want to hear TalkGropus AAA, BBB, etc"

5. The mobile or portable radio constantly searches for a stronger control channel - if a stronger CC is found, the radio sends a data burst on that channel (see 3 and 4)

The infrasturcture activates the required talkgroups on each tower as it receives the data bursts from the field units
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top