Technically, the site coordinates are in Bedford County...just barely.Clearly they consider it a Blair County site as the site name suggests.
View attachment 88388
Well the FCC Database has that location as being FULT01, not a Blair or Bedford site...
Deep breaths everybody. There are actually a few sites in the system that straddle borders and are identified with the "wrong" county by their system ID code. Personally, it used to drive me crazy, but I have learned to let go of things over which I have no control.
WQUV758 -- PENDING
- adding an additional site (BLAI02) to this license
BLAI02 - Martinsburg, PA (Blair) -- the license submission says Bedford Co but it's Blair Co
OFF ROUTE 164 3 MILES E OF MARTINSBURG
![]()
40°17'34.8"N 78°15'38.0"W · 40.293000, -78.260556
www.google.com
151.2275
155.52
156.21
Well the FCC Database has that location as being FULT01, not a Blair or Bedford site...
could be confusing because of the callsign in the original postI think ya better look again. Which one of these licenses says its FULT01 ?
![]()
Mike
Which sites ate 1.61 and 1.66?
When you see a site written like that, it's the format DSD+ uses to define a site. RFSS.SITE# Since we only have one RFSS right now, you can essentially ignore that and just focus on the site number.Which sites ate 1.61 and 1.66?
After checking the wiki, I see those TG numbers were already called out as WPP. But perhaps the Clear voice and Cranberry CSC clues will be helpful.From a local monitoring group's facebook group:
PA Starnet
First Energy (West Penn Power)
TGs: 40000, 40001, 40004, 40007 40011, 40015, and 40018
RIDs: 420xxxx
Sites: 1.61, 1.66
CLEAR VOICE!!!
Recorded Radio Maintenance calling Cranberry CSC?
I've been using FreeScan to record. Is Unitrunker a lot better for recording and logging sites and talkgroups?For those interested in listening to/recording this system (or any other P25 system for that matter), I strongly recommend picking up at least one RTL dongle (NooElec, RTL-SDR.com, FlightAware Pro Stick (orange not blue), etc.) and downloading the latest release of SDRTrunk (runs on Windows, Linux, or OSX using Java).
The software has come a long way in recent months, and is a great way to capture all active talkgroups at a site simultaneously, often requiring only one or two dongles, depending on the site channel configuration.
If all frequencies at a site don't span more than 2.4 MHz (e.g. 155.445, 155.550, 156.1125 = 0.6675 MHz of bandwidth), one dongle will suffice. If the frequencies span more than 2.4 MHz, you'll need additional dongles to cover the other frequencies (e.g. 854.6375, 856.8375, 857.9375, 858.8375 = 4.2 MHz of bandwidth, requiring two dongles)
Unitrunker is my weapon of choice for pure logging of activity, in particular the latest v2.1 branch, however SDRTrunk is the new king for FDMA/TDMA voice decoding and recording. Coupled with Trunking Recorder, it's darn near an unbeatable combo.
Unitrunker does not record audio - although you can use virtual cables to recording software; it more of a detailed logger. It can decode audio from legacy systems, and Phase 1 digital, but does not decode Phase 2 audio.I
I've been using FreeScan to record. Is Unitrunker a lot better for recording and logging sites and talkgroups?