BCD325P2/BCD996P2: Prices are dropping, 996P2

Status
Not open for further replies.

chas0039

Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2012
Messages
119
Reaction score
0
I have been watching these for a few weeks and I saw a drop from $399 to $375 to $340. Just in the last few days, I saw quite a few listings at $340 and today, I have seen more of the big on line sellers drop as well.

Not listing any sites as I am not sure if the forum allows that and no way do I want to do the wrong thing.
 

tampabaynews

Keeping your PIO busy
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 26, 2007
Messages
1,407
Reaction score
155
Location
Florida
I have been watching these for a few weeks and I saw a drop from $399 to $375 to $340. Just in the last few days, I saw quite a few listings at $340 and today, I have seen more of the big on line sellers drop as well.

Not listing any sites as I am not sure if the forum allows that and no way do I want to do the wrong thing.

There's nothing in the forum rules about posting links to websites.

Thanks for the tip though.
 

rwier

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Nov 6, 2006
Messages
1,919
Reaction score
17
Location
Phoenix, AZ
Thanks. The big ones are Main Trading Company and Ham Radio Outlet.

Thanks Chas, and all the others that tout scanner bargains. Don't need anything now, but if I live another year .... lol!
 

SCPD

QRT
Joined
Feb 24, 2001
Messages
0
Reaction score
115
Location
Virginia
Keep them prices coming down!!!. Looking to get another scanner, can never have enough ya know!. :)
 

Boatanchor

Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2011
Messages
991
Reaction score
6
The DIN form factor scanners never sold as well as the 'portables' in the past, so it doesn't really surprise me that Uniden are offerering sweet deals to their dealers on the 996P2 to try and move some stock.

Uniden messed up big time by producing yet another DIN sized scanner without NFM filtering and no improvement in memory/system management over the old XT series. Just think about it, if you wanted to buy a phase 2 capable scanner and only had ~$400, what would you buy, a 'flagship' BCD436HP with it's true NFM filtering and virtually unlimited system memory or a 'P2' scanner with no NFM filtering, very limited system/talkgroup memory and reduced battery life in the portable?

I've knocked the x36HP system in the past for various shortcomings but it does, at least, have potential to improve over time.
The P2 scanners on the other hand are permenantly handicapped from day one.

I know which one I would buy.
 

Voyager

Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2002
Messages
12,058
Reaction score
68
In other words, you want a top line scanner for a mid line price.
 

AA6IO

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
May 10, 2007
Messages
1,511
Reaction score
59
Location
Cerritos, CA (LA County)
I bought the 996P2, but that's because I have IBS (I buy scanner) sickness as posted on another thread. Nice scanner, but can't compete with the 436HP/536HP, problems and all. We keep getting back to that NFM filter in these discussions. Why anyone is making scanners nowadays without an NFM filter is beyond me.
But for those without IBS, who just have about $400-500 they want to spend for their one main scanner, hard to imagine not going for the 436HP/536HP, warts and all. When HRO is down to $339 already on the 996P2, you know those things are not really moving.
 

marcotor

I ♥ÆS Ø
Feed Provider
Joined
Nov 4, 2004
Messages
1,256
Reaction score
824
Location
Sunny SoCal
I can attest that it does. I bought a 996P2 for no good reason other than I wanted one. During the RS closeout mania, I purchased 4 Pro-252's and 3 Pro-651 which I gave to family and friends who were interested, but probably never would have spent the money themselves. I gave away 9 scanners in all, yet today I have more scanners than I did on New Years Day.

Go figure!
 
Joined
Apr 4, 2013
Messages
30
Reaction score
2
Location
Middle of Nowhere, Tn
I am confused by the term "very limited system/talkgroup memory" when discussing the 996P2. How is the memory limited I have according to the memory used in the info screen 1049 channels/9 systems/9sites which is just about every possible talkgroup and conventional frequency in my metro area in my 996 and I am using 2% of its memory.
 

marksmith

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 20, 2007
Messages
4,354
Reaction score
274
Location
Anne Arundel County, MD
I am confused by the term "very limited system/talkgroup memory" when discussing the 996P2. How is the memory limited I have according to the memory used in the info screen 1049 channels/9 systems/9sites which is just about every possible talkgroup and conventional frequency in my metro area in my 996 and I am using 2% of its memory.

When this issue is discussed, they are not talking about total overall memory or even the number of systems that can be entered. They are talking about the 500 item limit per system. You can have 500 information pieces in a single system, including frequencies, talkgroups and unit ID's.

When just discussing talkgroups and frequencies, this is not much of an issue except for some of the huge statewide systems that include tons of talkgroups and many sites. Those systems are usually broken out into smaller pieces anyway and usually don't create any real limitations other than you can't get the whole thing into one system,

Where the real limitation comes in is if you store unit ID's or radio ID's. A typical medium-sized city or county trunked system can easily have 5-6,000 unit ID's. Police, Fire, Public Works, Parks, Schools, County Administration, inspections, and the like including bases, mobiles and portables real easily exceed the 500 limit. And keep in mind the real limit is maybe 400 if you've already got a combination of 100 frequencies and talkgroups in the system.

The 996xt/396xt is the first radio I believe that was equipped to handle unit ID's or UID.
It's never been expanded in size. PSR-800, PRO-668, WS-1080, HP-1, HP-2, 436, 536, and other more recent radios all have UNLIMITED storage of unit ID's within a system.
The 996p2 is based on the 996xt and contains this same limitation. This is what is meant when the limitations of the 996p2 is discussed. If you don't store unit ID's its not really an issue. If you do, it's a BIG issue.

Once you have had UNLIMITED storage, it's hard to go back.
 

SCPD

QRT
Joined
Feb 24, 2001
Messages
0
Reaction score
115
Location
Virginia
Reception On a P2??

is it the same processor as the 996XT or is it a X36 with improved reception. And although I dont need the features of the 536 is the reception any better or worth it for 536 over a basic P2. I figure by the time Ohio goes Phase 2 scanning will be obsolete. Im basically updating my High band fire reception. Ideas??
 

Voyager

Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2002
Messages
12,058
Reaction score
68
The 536 has a true NFM filter which may be important if you are in or travel to a dense RF area.
 

SCPD

QRT
Joined
Feb 24, 2001
Messages
0
Reaction score
115
Location
Virginia
996 P2 or 536

It will be a boat anchor here on my desk, so is it a better deal to go with a P2 or 536 to monitor VHF and NON Phase 2 or spring for the extras albeit the problems?? Seems Ive read reception was better on P25 and VHF on the 536
 

Voyager

Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2002
Messages
12,058
Reaction score
68
Not sure what " or 536 to monitor VHF and NON Phase 2" means, as the 536 decodes P25 Phase II. But, if your desk is in a high RF density area, the 536 may be better for you. The rest of the decision is really personal preference. Do you want the extra 536 features? I think the 996P2 is going to be a pretty bullet-proof unit, however.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top