Replacement SD Cards

Status
Not open for further replies.

KK4JUG

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 13, 2014
Messages
4,406
Location
GA
UPMan, should stop using ****ty cards then.

I use Samsung EVO (TLC) cards in my dashcams for over 1.5 years and have had no problems.
Similarly, only because BCD436HP cannot accept anything larger than 32GB or a certain number of recorded folders, the only card I had was a SanDisk 32GB, but I hate SanDisk, because of performance and reliability issues, and even then I write all the time to that card, and it's been working fine for 2 years.
Don't know about Transcend, never used them, since they don't own their own fab, can't believe their stock from the fab is any better than SanDisk or Kingston, or others.

I, too, avoid SanDisk cards. SanDisk and Toshiba seem to be the most frequently counterfeited cards. I think authentic SanDisk cards are just fine but there are so many fakes out there that it's not worth taking a chance.

I have been using Transcend cards for some time now. They seem to be just fine. So far, no issues.
 

kc2kth

Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2004
Messages
436
Location
Toms River NJ
Wow, I might switch from SanDisk after reading this. I had no idea they weren't the best and that there are counterfeit issues with them. I just read an article on a photo site that ranked a bunch of them and the best SanDisk Extreme card ranked very low. Transcend was very high on that same list.
 

marksmith

Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2007
Messages
4,348
Location
Anne Arundel County, MD
I have been using high speed Transcend cards in my fast frames per second digital cameras for years. I find them to be faster and more reliable than sandisk.

Sent from my LG-V410 using Tapatalk
 

kandrey89

Member
Feed Provider
Joined
Dec 11, 2009
Messages
320
Location
San Ramon, CA USA
I always buy my cards from sold by amazon.com, that way they're always authentic. If you're clueless or blind, well, you're playing with fire and could get a fake.
Use this to test the card: H2testw Download
 

werinshades

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 21, 2002
Messages
6,210
Location
Chicago , IL
We will be switching our production from using 8GB TLC type SD cards to 4GB MLC type SD cards (we actually originally provided 4GB TLC cards then did an unadvertised change to 8GB).

All devices will eventually wear out an SD card (if it does any writing at all). I typically have to replace my dashcam's 2 cards every 3 months or so. It is just the nature of the SD technology.

The benefit of MLC, and what makes it worth us changing even though it will be at a lower (but still the advertised) capacity, is that MLC NAND memory has a tremendously longer life. It is recommended for use in dashcams, security video cams, and other devices that do intense data writing. They advertise up to 12,000 hours of continuous video writing before failure (in 64GB cards).

So, when you go to replace your card, we are now highly recommending you get an MLC type card. They are typically advertised as "industrial" or "high endurance." Here is an example of one on Amazon: https://www.amazon.com/Transcend-In...F8&qid=1474011547&sr=8-1&keywords=mlc+sd+card

For the capacity, the price isn't unreasonable, either.

As per the suggestion, I did this as well. Ordered 2-32gb SD cards for $20/each.

Found this You Tube video helpful: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yGFI1D8Zzj0
 

xlr8

Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2006
Messages
124
Location
Northeast of James County, Echo Mike 75
SD Card Capacity for BCD436HP

Other than the obvious advantages of additional systems and recording capacity, are there any disadvantages in terms of speed of access for read/write to the scanner for the 8, 16, or 32 GB SD card sizes? Just wondering if there were any drawbacks in getting one of the larger capacity cards for the 436 up to the 32 GB capacity.

Thanks in advance.
 

kandrey89

Member
Feed Provider
Joined
Dec 11, 2009
Messages
320
Location
San Ramon, CA USA
For Uniden, there are no issues with larger cards, other than when you reach a certain number of folders, it'll refuse to record, which is about 16-24GB depending on transmission length.
I have 32GB and had no problems.

For Whistler on the other hand, their interface and architecture is not user friendly, the larger the card, the longer the boot time. You can't switch channels with the turn of the knob and you can't pause on a channel while scanning without going through the menu, and power-on with car ignition does not work. Basically Whistler is anti-mobile use friendly. Good luck changing a channel when driving.
 

kwd57

Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2007
Messages
60
Why does this from Sandisk sound oppisite ?

Single-level cell (SLC) and multi-level cell (MLC) Flash memory are similar in their design.

MLC Flash devices cost less and allow for higher storage density.
SLC Flash devices provide faster write performance and greater reliability, even at temperatures above the operating range of MLC Flash devices.


These factors make SLC Flash a good fit in embedded systems, while MLC flash makes it possible to create affordable mobile devices with large amounts of data storage.


In order to select the right Flash memory for an application, it is important to analyze the how it will be used.


For example, product developers integrating memory into a portable barcode reader will most likely need SLC Flash since performance and durability are important.
On the other hand, a company building a portable media player will need the low cost and high density of MLC to price their device competitively.


SLC Flash is used in commercial and industrial applications that require high performance and long-term reliability.
Some applications include industrial grade Compact Flash cards or Solid State Drives (SSDs).


MLC Flash is used in consumer applications that do not require long term reliability such as consumer grade USB Flash drives, portable media players, and Compact Flash cards.


The read speeds between SLC and MLC are comparable. Reading the level of the Flash cell compares the threshold voltage using a voltage comparator. Thus, the architecture change does not affect sensing.
In general, the read speeds of Flash are determined by which controller is used.


The endurance of SLC Flash is 10x more than MLC Flash.
The endurance of MLC Flash decreases due to enhanced degradation of the substrate.
This is a main reason why SLC Flash is considered industrial grade Flash and MLC Flash is considered consumer grade Flash.



Higher temperatures cause more leakage in the cells. Combined with the increased sensitivity required to differentiate between the levels, this leakage will cause the sensors to read the wrong level.
As a result, the operating temperature of MLC spans only the commercial range.
Leakage is not significant in SLC Flash and thus, it can operate in an industrial temperature range.


Then, it is important to evaluate what type of Flash memory your system needs.


If performance and durability are essential for your system, SLC Flash incorporated.
If low cost and high density are essential, MLC Flash is the right choice.


The high-performance MLC technology with three bits per cell, is commonly referred to as Triple Level Cell (TLC), which uses eight states
We will be switching our production from using 8GB TLC type SD cards to 4GB MLC type SD cards (we actually originally provided 4GB TLC cards then did an unadvertised change to 8GB).

All devices will eventually wear out an SD card (if it does any writing at all). I typically have to replace my dashcam's 2 cards every 3 months or so. It is just the nature of the SD technology.

The benefit of MLC, and what makes it worth us changing even though it will be at a lower (but still the advertised) capacity, is that MLC NAND memory has a tremendously longer life. It is recommended for use in dashcams, security video cams, and other devices that do intense data writing. They advertise up to 12,000 hours of continuous video writing before failure (in 64GB cards).

So, when you go to replace your card, we are now highly recommending you get an MLC type card. They are typically advertised as "industrial" or "high endurance." Here is an example of one on Amazon: https://www.amazon.com/Transcend-In...F8&qid=1474011547&sr=8-1&keywords=mlc+sd+card

For the capacity, the price isn't unreasonable, either.
 

jonwienke

More Info Coming Soon!
Joined
Jul 18, 2014
Messages
13,409
Location
VA
Other than the obvious advantages of additional systems and recording capacity, are there any disadvantages in terms of speed of access for read/write to the scanner for the 8, 16, or 32 GB SD card sizes? Just wondering if there were any drawbacks in getting one of the larger capacity cards for the 436 up to the 32 GB capacity.

Read/write performance is determined by the type of flash memory in the card, and the card controller. If you're not storing recordings, there is still an advantage to using a larger card--writes are spread out among a larger pool of free sectors, and therefore the wear-leveling function in the card can keep the card working longer before sectors wear out from lots of writes.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top