Stark County Ohio

wa8pyr

Technischer Guru
Staff member
Lead Database Admin
Joined
Sep 22, 2002
Messages
7,194
Location
Ohio
Posie777 -

Two suggesstions -

1. Only use the Control and Alternate frequencies for MARCS Towers. Unlike a Harris System, MARCS does not use voice frequencies as control frequencies.

Just for the sake of clarity, designated control channels in Motorola systems are used as voice channels also, except for the currently active control channel.
 

jdgohus1

Member
Joined
Jun 23, 2016
Messages
21
Location
Ohio
I noticed that their is no talkgroup listed yet for Hartville fire. Do we know when they will join MARCS? Also Perry Twp fire has not moved yet. Whats the delay?
 
Joined
Jul 26, 2003
Messages
866
Location
Canton, OH
I noticed that their is no talkgroup listed yet for Hartville fire. Do we know when they will join MARCS? Also Perry Twp fire has not moved yet. Whats the delay?

Perry is getting radios programmed at this time.

No word on: Hartville, North Lawrence, Nimishillen Twp, East Sparta / Tri-Division
 
Joined
Jul 26, 2003
Messages
866
Location
Canton, OH
I am told that the issue with more Cencom departments making the switch is Cencom itself. This come from sources at Perry Twp. Fire. I do not know the exact issue but that is what I hear.
 
Joined
Jul 26, 2003
Messages
866
Location
Canton, OH
Communications issue today at Fisher's Foods fire in Perry Twp. Four mutual aid departments, Canton Twp, Plain Twp. Massillon, and Canton City were all on MARCS and Perry Twp is still operating on UHF. The remaining Stark County departments need to get on-board with MARCS. These issues are what the system was built to eliminate.
 
Joined
Jul 26, 2003
Messages
866
Location
Canton, OH
MVA today at Broadway & 62. Once again, communications issues between Nimishillen Twp who is not on MARCS and all of the arriving mutual aid departments who are on MARCS.
 

Posie777

Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2019
Messages
14
Location
Massillon, Ohio
A. Do I have this Antenna in the correct hanging position ?
Right side is pointed toward Stark County Albrecht Tower 3 miles from me. It is hooked up to the WS1065. It's doing nothing better than the original telescope antenna. UGH..This was a waste of my money. Bought and recommended from Scannermaster last week. Only Conv channels coming thru complete and clear with WS1065.
With that said…..
B. SDS200 … The CONV channel.. Noticed first 2-3 seconds of CONV transmission not coming thru on SDS.
Do I have something wrong in Sentinal settings?
Thank you.
 

Attachments

  • ScreenHunter_13444 Jun. 23 23.58.jpg
    ScreenHunter_13444 Jun. 23 23.58.jpg
    66.9 KB · Views: 45

mszabo2000

Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2011
Messages
186
Location
Rootstown, Oh
A. Do I have this Antenna in the correct hanging position ?
Right side is pointed toward Stark County Albrecht Tower 3 miles from me. It is hooked up to the WS1065. It's doing nothing better than the original telescope antenna. UGH..This was a waste of my money. Bought and recommended from Scannermaster last week. Only Conv channels coming thru complete and clear with WS1065.
With that said…..
B. SDS200 … The CONV channel.. Noticed first 2-3 seconds of CONV transmission not coming thru on SDS.
Do I have something wrong in Sentinal settings?
Thank you.

You have the antenna pointing in the right direction but using an antenna indoors vs outdoors as intended will impact its performance. As for the WS1065 not receiving the Stark system, most older scanners cannot properly decode the CQPSK linear modulation used in simulcast systems like Stark but work fine on ASR sites which use C4FM modulation. I would use the SDS2000 for the Stark system and your WS1065 for conventional channels.
 
Joined
Jul 26, 2003
Messages
866
Location
Canton, OH
Canton fire used three TG today not regularly used, the two I submitted and EMS. Hall of Fame festival events started today so we may see some new fire, police, and service TG pop up over the next two weeks.

Sent from my SM-J327V using Tapatalk
 

jdgohus1

Member
Joined
Jun 23, 2016
Messages
21
Location
Ohio
Volfirefighter, thanks for continually submitting info for the new system. It is appreciated! Now, can you tell me why the volume on some, not all of the dispatch consoles at the SO and Canton are so low? At times you can hardly hear them and then when the mobiles respond they are at a much higher volume. Has anyone else noticed this? I'm using a SDS100 and SDS200 and it is the same on both.
 

mszabo2000

Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2011
Messages
186
Location
Rootstown, Oh
Volfirefighter, thanks for continually submitting info for the new system. It is appreciated! Now, can you tell me why the volume on some, not all of the dispatch consoles at the SO and Canton are so low? At times you can hardly hear them and then when the mobiles respond they are at a much higher volume. Has anyone else noticed this? I'm using a SDS100 and SDS200 and it is the same on both.

Several possibilities, tech didn't set audio levels correctly, dispatcher speaks in a low voice, dispatcher doesn't speak directly into the headset mic.
 
Joined
Jul 26, 2003
Messages
866
Location
Canton, OH
North Lawrence FD testing alot of radios with Cencom on 45138. Sounds like they are getting ready to make the switch. TG is already in the database.
 
Top