I don't agree with this at all. The $700 PAGER was purpose built and designed for P25 and analog paging of fire departments. Some people figured out how to creatively program them to be a limited function pager. The company has realized that there is a market for the scanner functionality and has put R&D into designing a firmware to provide that functionality to current users. This is time and effort they never intended on expending based on previous posts on this very board by Unication employees, but yet, they did.
Unication didn't have to make this investment, they could have built and marketed an entirely new product to cover this market, most likely with the same or higher price point as the pager. People would have been clamoring to buy it and wouldn't be complaining about the price, but those same people complain over a much lower possible price for an upgrade. If a company expends resources to change the functionality of something, making it in essence a different product, why shouldn't they be able to recover the time, effort and employee resources invested in that effort?
[/QUO
Fine.