This thread is a reminder why the opinion of the typical Radio Reference user is what it is on certain other forums I participate on. It's worse than Howard Forums. I don't even bother going there anymore, because it's all "my carrier rules, yours sucks...my phone rules, yours sucks" as if
ANYONE CARES who you pay for your cellular service.
Truth is ALL the carriers suck. Truth is all the phones have problems.
In the early days of that forum, there were technical discussions about wireless network technology, network buildouts of the various carriers systems, and legal issues.
Today it's nothing but a bunch of childish fanboys who wear cheerleading uniforms for their favorite carrier of the week and phone of the week. Anyone who tries to have a meaningful technical discussion is shunned, mocked or worse by the mouth breathing masses who are so lacking of even basic technical knowledge it isn't even funny. I am sure the corporate bosses of the wireless telecom cartels have a good laugh while having drinks browsing those forums. Especially when the carrier cheerleaders pop up. Anyone who DARES challenge the T-Mobile fanboys are reminded that John Legere is Jesus Christ and you are the anit-Christ for saying anything negative about "big pink".
I see this forum going the same route. Anyone who tries to point out the
FACTS surrounding the very real
hardware shortcomings of the new Uniden BC-436/536 are either censored, their thread moved to the "rants" forum, ridiculed (you always know how right you are by the number of insults you receive) or banned.
If you do the math, it's already been pointed out why. The manufacturer is a business partner with the owners of this site. No brainer.
But if you want open, honest discussion of a technical nature, this forum is not it. If you want open, HONEST criticism (both positive and negative) of the current crop of scanners, you should not do that here. You will be called names, belittled or outright censored. Why? Pretty clear to me,
FOLLOW THE MONEY.
Like all corporate media, they will only allow what their corporate paymasters allow.
The Insider (film) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Get the picture? Go watch that 1999 film and see how media, much like this forum, is all about the money.
What I find hilarious is how many of you actually stand up and defend Uniden (or any manufacturer) like it's your friggin high school mascot. You are worse than those carrier fanboys on Howard Forums. You kiss up to the "Uniden Product Manager" as if he goes home and thinks about you sitting in your room petting your Uniden scanner.
Once again, he, like Uniden, is about the money. That's all.
As a consumer of his company's past products, I have a mixed taste in my mouth. The BCD-396T I have sucks on P25 phase 1 LSM. OTOH, they did handle a hardware repair very well two years ago. But it's useless to reliably monitor the many phase 1 800MHz systems using LSM simulcast because of the
hardware design. I get that, second generation product, but I get that. So, one would think by the THIRD generation of digital scanner, Uniden would hire some competent engineers and try something the rest of the digital RF world has known about for years: the I/Q demodulator:
http://www.microwavejournal.com/ext/resources/pdf-downloads/IQTheory-of-Operation.pdf?1336590796
When I had the chance to try a BC-436 on my county's system, it sucks just as bad. After reviewing the thread on another site which actually ENCOURAGES deep technical discussion on the 436, it was revealed why: the same old, tired and technically FLAWED design of the use of a discriminator tap, which will NOT EVER produce consistent performance of proper CQPSK-LSM demodulation. Third generation of product, first generation design. That's plain GARBAGE. When the Uniden product manager was asked about the demodulator design used in his company's new product, he either gave non-answers or some nonsense about "proprietary" technology of DVSI. Well that is plain B.S. No one asked for the code DVSI provides or reverse engineering, just simple question: does your product utilize an I/Q demodulator circuit in the front end for LSM or not? No answer. Of course the truth ultimately WAS revealed by someone else.
When this fact was made known here, the first thing one of the true pioneers of the OP25 project pointed it out, he got an infraction. When others bring it up, they are told "works fine for me. Must be your imagination". When people point out that the product is poorly built, the fanboys step up and call the critics names, saying "we need to get another hobby". Or even better are the laughable notion that "future firmware updates will fix it". Technically flawed responses from people who lack technical knowledge and speak through their sphincters on the subject as usual.
Oh well, back to P25.ca where real technical discussion takes place, enjoy your cheerleading tryouts corporate fanboys! Maybe they'll throw in some pom-poms and Hello Kitty stickers for your scanners.