mmckenna
I ♥ Ø
Welcome to the result of the desire to bring more people into the hobby by dumbing it down to the point someone with a single digit IQ can cram a weekend and do a multiple guess exam.
I wish I could disagree, but I can't.
Welcome to the result of the desire to bring more people into the hobby by dumbing it down to the point someone with a single digit IQ can cram a weekend and do a multiple guess exam.
I wish I could disagree, but I can't.
The problem I've seen, is that for the majority of the mouth breathers, it doesn't continue.I'm good with a low entry bar as long as the learning continues.
After they get the $19 CCR, with the $5 garbage audio accessories, you can tell them until you are blue in the face, they sound like ****, but to them they 'work great' even though they don't.I wish more new hams would discover that there are better tools than the $19 Chinese radios, and that there really is a difference.
As soon as the ARRL RAC(because these are the entities I am familiar with) decided to equate number of new licenses to hobby health, it was a lost cause.As it stands now, there seems to be too many that look at the number of existing valid FCC licenses down here in the states as some sign of the health of the hobby. My experience is that the increased number of licenses has not translated into a better outcome for the hobby.
I like to teach, and help people grow. What I javelin seen, is they don't want to.I'm good with a low entry bar as long as the learning continues.
I wish more new hams would discover that there are better tools than the $19 Chinese radios, and that there really is a difference.
As it stands now, there seems to be too many that look at the number of existing valid FCC licenses down here in the states as some sign of the health of the hobby. My experience is that the increased number of licenses has not translated into a better outcome for the hobby.
As soon as the ARRL RAC(because these are the entities I am familiar with) decided to equate number of new licenses to hobby health, it was a lost cause.
Spot ****ing on.The entire concept of elmering has been replaced by YouTube and short attention spans. If one can't get their fix of info in 10 minutes, they move on. This is not just an amateur radio thing, it's today's humans versus old school "free range" humans who had to WORK and put in TIME to gain knowledge, experience and payed it forward passing it onto the next generation.
That's been replaced by technology fed by algorithms and AI, all owned by a small number of corporations. Change my mind.
Yep, Careful, our "old man attitude" is started to show. 73 OM.Welcome to the result of the desire to bring more people into the hobby by dumbing it down to the point someone with a single digit IQ can cram a weekend and do a multiple guess exam.
That and the removal of any sort of financial barrier to entry.
We now have barely literate people buying **** $20 baofengs, begging to get a pre-built codeplug because they can't can't bothered to actually learn how a radio works and learn how to program it.
So true. Look at not just these, but any forum.Spot ****ing on.
It seems nobody is taught to learn.
People just come to places like this, expecting to be given the answer, or information they want, with out putting in any effort to try and either learn, or look for the answer or information they are seeking.
I come here on occasion to find help with things that no one local can help me with. (a unication pager). After I've exhausted google, obviously you cannot get help from the manufacturer, then yes I come here and ask if anyone else has had a similar experience. While I've made the things do things already I was told "it won't do", I still like to get things sorted out and working best possible regardless of always "what the book says". trust me, if I've asked here (on RR) I've looked. I've elmered many in the ham hobby and to that end some commercial stuff. My pat answer is, "if I don't know the answer, we'll find it together" and to date it's worked pretty well helping others. Frankly I've gotten some pretty good answers here on RR pertaining to that device, most were spot on by people that owned them longer than I have and also tried to make the thing sing and dance. I appreciate anyone that steps up to help anyone that genuinely want's to learn and will put forth effort.Spot ****ing on.
It seems nobody is taught to learn.
People just come to places like this, expecting to be given the answer, or information they want, with out putting in any effort to try and either learn, or look for the answer or information they are seeking.
Not sure I agree and as I have stated elsewhere I am not an ARRL fan,
but any progress to keeping the lights on in amateur radio might be called a success…then again maybe not🫤
The AI/TikTok/YouTube generation DEMAND to SPOON FED. Too lazy to even use search engines.
I'm pretty sure it backfired all the way around, both to the ARRL themselves and to the "big 3" manufacturers that pushed for it.Join the club. There's a lot of people that agree. ARRL lost their way when they started focusing on new licensee numbers rather than quality. That and their asinine "when all else fails" steaming pile of bull ****.
I think the push for increasing the quantity of new hams over the quality is a very short lived and near sighted approach. I'm sure it looks good to the ARRL and the CEO's of the companies selling radios, but long term I think it's going to do a lot more harm than good.
It’s only a hobby👍
Lol. While I am closer to 50 than I am 40, I'm still quite young for this hobby.Yep, Careful, our "old man attitude" is started to show. 73 OM.
This is where I chime in and say that my first "ham radio" was a Yaesu FT-23R. Five watt handheld, 2m only, just 10 memory channels, DTMF and CTCSS were options. About $230 in 1989; $589.47 today. Don't tell me about the "high cost of entry".That's what it cost me to get started in this hobby, a bare bones IC-2SAT that didn't even have a CTCSS board(all the repeaters where I got started were carrier squelch). Oh, that was 1993, when I was 15. In 2024 dollars that is CAD$281.83 or US$208.34.