I am a life long learner, and I don't have an issue with helping and teaching what I know, to others that want to learn. What I .on't have time for, is people that can't be bothered to do any research on their own, and just expect others to spoonfeed them the answers
'I'm having trouble figuring out how to create a digital channel in my Anytone' is going to get my attention.
'Does someone have a basic digital codeplug for an Anyone, that I can use to learn how to program my new radio' is going to get my attention
''Where can I get a codeplug for x area' is going to either get ignored completely.
In defense of the new and naive, I think these are perfectly reasonable questions, I think the answers are embarrassing. The answer goes something like this: "Ham has been given a century to develop and organize itself, but it hasn't. There are very few codeplugs out of the box that work for an area for several reasons. 1.) Digital technology is totally fragmented in most areas. 2.) There is no registration of repeaters that requires a pledge that you will operate them for a period of time and keep them in a registry. 3.) As insane as it sounds, you must constantly and perpetually tweak your codeplugs because repeaters die or their functions are not maintained to a standard of a does-not-exist self governing association or fraternity.
The question from a neophyte isn't the embarrassing part, its that in a century of RF so little structure and organization has formed. Contrast this to the other technical disciplines and even in an area of chaos and creativity (free open source software?) there is structure, governing principles, and accountability.
Anyone getting into ham is going to ask questions based on assumptions that it would function like other technologies and they are shocked to learn that it does not. Even the basics of a central repository of codeplugs that the world has nominated to be the defacto place to get them does not exist, unlike software where you could say it is Github.
I'm not ripping on ham, but I am defending the questions of the naive because their questions are natural, the answers are true but illogical.
As to the hate for the $13 baofeng radio (CCR?), I hate to say it, but with 100% certainty they will probably run ALL the other companies out of business in the coming years if radio acts like any other technological product. They started by making junk, then held their pricepoints and made better, and continued to evolve into digital where you can get a DMR for $50 while competitors were at $600. Then they branched out into the full-featured Radiooddity/TTY/Anytone $200-$300 pricepoint offering way more tech than any other players because they had the VOLUME of units sold that could bend the COST OF GOODS down. Give it five years and there will be so little market left for an Icom or Yaesu left to vie for, the premium companies will be forced to double their costs since they'll have an ever shrinking specialty market. All while the CCRs are able to pack more features into a small factor for far lower costs. In 20 years, a Baofeng version of an ICOM 7300 will be ubiquitous for 1/4 the price. You can hate this opinion, but its the logical conclusion of global markets and mass manufacturing, the CCRs have the power of market hegemony.