I just bought my 436 3 weeks ago. You'll be happy to know it has no clock problem, and the backlight is very easy to read. : )
Give it time....3 wks is not very longI just bought my 436 3 weeks ago. You'll be happy to know it has no clock problem, and the backlight is very easy to read. : )
I just bought my 436 3 weeks ago. You'll be happy to know it has no clock problem, and the backlight is very easy to read. : )
YES! The repair campaign link is on page 1 of this post.I've had my 436 for about 2.5 years with no clock issues noticed. Over the past two weeks, every time I turn on the unit, it says that the clock setting have been lost, so I enter the current date/time and all is well, until I turn the unit off then on again... unit is back to saying the clock setting have been lost. I assume this is the characteristics of the real time clock repair campaign issue?
That's normal. It happened to me. And it's happened to all of us. Turn around time is about 3 to 4 weeks. No worry. They work harder with repairing units than they do with notifications.On 15 June 2016, I received a email from Uniden, with a link, indicating that my BCD436HP had been received into the repair program. When I select the link, I am taken to a site that tells me that my unit is in the system. My 436 has been in the "received" status for more than a week yet I have not received a SRO# nor update. Can Paul or someone please advise.
I doubt it....They removed a lot of cases...I bet they're good at it by now... .... Probably shipping damageI just got my 536 back today. It had the clock defect. The statement said the clock, speaker jack and diodes were repaired. Quick turn around. The down side is the case has a dent in it and there are scratches on the side of the case that were not there went the unit was sent in. I would venture a guess this occurred when the case was removed for the repair work.
I returned my 436 and 536 a while ago. They both shipped today [presumably back to me], both listing the RTC problem on the detailed status page. The real problem with the 536 was that the backlight was unreadably dim. Should I expect that to have been fixed notwithstanding that there is no comment or discussion about it on the detailed status screen, or will it have to go back again?