That doesn't make sense. A one-man unit identifying himself as a Tom unit made a traffic stop. Trainees don't make traffic stops by themselves. And investigative unit perhaps? I'm not saying it isn't a trainee it just doesn't make sense having been in law enforcement for the trainee would be making a traffic stop by himself. I also heard the radio traffic and he did not sound like a trainee. He sounded like a very well experience law enforcement officer. I guess I'll have to put some feelers out to those that I do know and see what comes back and let somebody here can confirm one way or another. I'm open to suggestion regardless of my comments here.
I am not sure how I could have said it more clearly than ".... the officer I was talking to verified that was a trainee on a ride-along" but I can break it down
1. I was in direct face-to-face conversation with the Edward unit, a great source of information BTW.
2. Over the radio we both heard the Tom unit identify and talk to dispatch.
3. I asked the Edward unit if "T" stood for "Trainee"
4. He said yes AND that the Trainee was on a ride-along (meaning ALONG with a regular Edward officer)
5. So the Edward officer in the vehicle observes the Trainee make the radio calls, make the stops, write citations, give warnings, etc.
I hope I did a better job but I thought the term "ride-along" never meant being in a vehicle alone but was understood to specify at least one person riding with one other person. Most times it is a senior officer observing and coaching a junior officer.
Jim
Orange County, CA