FWIW, after sleuthing a dozen Duke sites in Indiana today, I noticed the DSD+ P25data text file did NOT record all of the data. For some sites it only logged the site number, and CC freq. Luckily I snapped a picture of my computer screen with my cell phone for every site, as I received them; then edited the image to write the geographic site location on the image. Since a lot of the frequencies are reused on several sites, and the P25data file doesn't indicate geographic location, it's best to somehow record the geographic location with a site number, especially if you're going to be logging multiple sites.
Keep in mind that for a peer that was not directly monitored it will show two lines, one being the sys/site and the other being the ch num and cc freq.
Once you monitor that specific site direct, the stanza will contain all info
If you are saying you monitored a site directly, and that site did not have full results in the P 25 data file, then that’s some oddity that I’ve never seen before
Mike
The latter is correct. I have pictures that show the data in the DSD+ Event window, yet the data is not in the P25data file.
Negative...I’m curious if the current P2 capable scanners can decode TDMA if programmed as conventional instead of trunked.
Keep in mind that for a peer that was not directly monitored it will show two lines, one being the sys/site and the other being the ch num and cc freq.
Once you monitor that specific site direct, the stanza will contain all info
If you are saying you monitored a site directly, and that site did not have full results in the P 25 data file, then that’s some oddity that I’ve never seen before
Mike
I am having this exact issue with one particular site here in Florida --- Lake Buena Vista (site 25)
doug
View attachment 107806
I am having this exact issue with one particular site here in Florida --- Lake Buena Vista (site 25)
doug
View attachment 107806