Everything NYPD encryption.

hitechRadio

Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2010
Messages
556
YES, Encrypting TAC channels is understandable for an incident like this..... Encrypting Dispatch is not the right way to go.... The NYPD and City of NY will use this incident to push their horrendus agenda to Encrypt 100%
Would you be OK with primary dispatch channel in the clear and the officers talking back to dispatch encrypted?
 

richee2000

Communications Professional
Joined
Sep 29, 2014
Messages
2,259
Location
Sea Bright NJ, East Hanover NJ, Basking Ridge NJ
Would you be OK with primary dispatch channel in the clear and the officers talking back to dispatch encrypted?
There is no reason to Encrypt every day dispatch comms. There is every reason to Encrypt sensitive comms on Tac channels. If you are concerned about officer safety, then the answer is to allow the public to listen in, but with a 10 minute delay, like Chicago and Baltimore
 

hitechRadio

Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2010
Messages
556
There is no reason to Encrypt every day dispatch comms. There is every reason to Encrypt sensitive comms on Tac channels. If you are concerned about officer safety, then the answer is to allow the public to listen in, but with a 10 minute delay, like Chicago and Baltimore
So what if let say, that no 10 minute delay, dispatchers in the clear and officers encrypted on the everyday dispatch channel. Would you be OK with that?
 

richee2000

Communications Professional
Joined
Sep 29, 2014
Messages
2,259
Location
Sea Bright NJ, East Hanover NJ, Basking Ridge NJ
Negative. The press, City council members, senators, and multiple community watch groups are advocating for transparency. That would be full transparency not half. The best compromise is exactly what Chicago police and Baltimore Police did and that is offer clear communications to the public with a 10 minute delay... Both sides of the conversation... A dispatched call with no other communications is somewhat irrelevant to the actual conclusion to the event. It's like watching half of the movie... Or reading half of the book. Negative.

Police departments have the option of changing to a secure encrypted tac channel for sensitive communications.

All precinct communications should be in the clear. (With a delay if necessary for officer safety)
 

hitechRadio

Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2010
Messages
556
Trying to wrap my head around the point of against ENC on primary channel for the officer, but OK with a 10min delay.

If I was giving the option, I would be OK with dispatchers in the clear, officers encrypted and no 10 minute delay.

Otherwise what's the point, especially for community watch groups.
 

richee2000

Communications Professional
Joined
Sep 29, 2014
Messages
2,259
Location
Sea Bright NJ, East Hanover NJ, Basking Ridge NJ
Trying to wrap my head around the point of against ENC on primary channel for the officer, but OK with a 10min delay.

If I was giving the option, I would be OK with dispatchers in the clear, officers encrypted and no 10 minute delay.

Otherwise what's the point, especially for community watch groups.
As I'm sure you are aware, there are many dispatch calls which are unfounded or are possibly false calls... By listening to only dispatch calls you do not get a full picture of what is actually happening. Kind of useless for most purposes. A 10-minute delay would still give the full accounting of crime in someone's neighborhood.
 

chrismol1

P25 TruCking!
Joined
Mar 15, 2008
Messages
1,294
Yea thats something I've occasionally wondered about agencies that leave dispatch unencrypted as a point of transparency. I don't know how it is there but around me, having dispatch only clear would leave the transparency to the initial dispatch and that's all because often they don't always repeat information from units in the field unless its a significant incident of some sort. Instead all you'd be hearing is a string of "received" or "10-4s" to every response and/or the time. Not trying to argue anything, just making an observation
 

richee2000

Communications Professional
Joined
Sep 29, 2014
Messages
2,259
Location
Sea Bright NJ, East Hanover NJ, Basking Ridge NJ
YES, Encrypting TAC channels is understandable for an incident like this..... Encrypting Dispatch is not the right way to go.... The NYPD and City of NY will use this incident to push their horrendus agenda to Encrypt 100%

Yea thats something I've occasionally wondered about agencies that leave dispatch unencrypted as a point of transparency. I don't know how it is there but around me, having dispatch only clear would leave the transparency to the initial dispatch and that's all because often they don't always repeat information from units in the field unless its a significant incident of some sort. Instead all you'd be hearing is a string of "received" or "10-4s" to every response and/or the time. Not trying to argue anything, just making an observation
Totally agree
 

KD8FSJ

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2001
Messages
672
Location
Ann Arbor, MI
Hopefully the New York State bills to outlaw dispatch Encrypted frequencies will prevail. There is more and more evidence every day against encrypting dispatch communications, and the harm it causes.

Hopefully the New York State bills to outlaw dispatch Encrypted frequencies will prevail. There is more and more evidence every day against encrypting dispatch communications, and the harm it causes.
Good luck on that bill.
 
Top