GS Parkway Radio System

Status
Not open for further replies.

n2nov

Active Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2002
Messages
832
Location
Staten Island, NYC
> Joe Cardani, KC2TUS

Hey Joe, congrats on finally getting licensed!
You can check into the NYDXA Net from the Philly area by using 449.025/203.5 in Bordentown, NJ.
 

GM

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
1,099
GSP 217 MHz system

A continuation of the earlier posting from me on some of the new freq's for the NJ Turnpike Authority's system:

Holmdel:
217.5625
217.6500
217.7875
217.8625*

Tinton Falls: (Asbury Toll Plaza)
217.5875*
217.6625
217.8125
217.8875

Toms River:
217.6000
217.7000
217.8000
217.9000*

Barnegat:
217.5625*
217.6500
217.7875
217.8625

Galloway: (Exit 44)
217.6125
217.7500
217.8500

Egg Harbor:
217.5875
217.6625
217.8875*

Swainton: (Exit 13)
217.5375*
217.6875
217.8375

* Denotes that no pulsing sound was heard on this freq, unlike the others with it every two seconds.

Those that have the necessary equipment/toys to decode this system (etrunker, data slicers, etc.) here's a start to find out how this system works/links together. (I used a BC296D in search mode with a 12.5 kHz step to find this info.)

I will report what the Turnpike uses at a later date with freq's/locations.
 
Last edited:

GM

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
1,099
NJ Turnpike Authority 217 MHz

To add to the thread... since this new radio system is also on the NJ Turnpike and operated by same authority, here's what I came up with for the Turnpike during my other recent field trip:

From North to South:

Bayonne:
217.5875
217.6250
217.6875
217.8375*

Woodbridge:
see earlier post

Cranbury:
217.5500*
217.6125
217.7500
217.8500

Chesterfield:
217.5875
217.6625
217.8125
217.8875*

Mt. Laurel:
217.5375
217.6250
217.6875
217.8375*

Deptford:
217.5500
217.6125
217.7500
217.8500*

Deepwater:
217.6000*
217.7000
217.8000
217.9000

That's all for now. For those who have the toys/programs to do so, may this be a start to figure out how this system works out for the rest of us.
 

mondaro

Member
Feed Provider
Joined
Mar 1, 2004
Messages
1,338
Location
Harrison, New Jersey
READ THIS PARKWAY RADIO GUYS !!

Another disaster !!

NY State Said to Be Close to Dropping Police Radio Project
By KEN BELSON and AL BAKER
NY TIMES

State officials are close to canceling a $2 billion contract to build a statewide wireless network for emergency agencies after critical tests on the network failed late last year, according to state officials briefed on the results.

Lawyers for the vendor, M/A-COM, a subsidiary of Tyco Electronics, sent the state a letter on Friday threatening to sue if officials follow through on their plan to shut down the project, which was intended to improve radio communications throughout the state, but particularly in remote areas where police agencies have trouble talking to one another.

State officials, though, were said to be determined to shut down the project because it was unclear, after a pilot program in two counties and nearly $52 million in expenditures, that M/A-COM’s system would ever work as expected. A major problem has been the difficulty and unanticipated cost of installing radio towers in remote, mountainous areas, according to the officials and technical experts, who spoke anonymously because the contract dispute is at a delicate juncture.

To finish the project, state officials decided that considerably more money would have to be spent at a time when the state is expected to have large budget deficits. At the same time, the state cannot embark on a new network project, no matter what the cost, until it untangles itself from its current contract, one state official said.

“The state is reviewing the letter from the attorneys for M/A-COM,” said Morgan Hook, a spokesman for Gov. David A. Paterson. “We anticipate making a decision in short order that will be based on our factual analysis of the system’s performance.”

Lawyers from Weil, Gotshal & Manges, the firm representing M/A-COM, said in their letter that it was “patently obvious” that the state was determined to cancel the contract because of political and financial pressure and was using technical issues as a pretext for the cancellation.

The State Office for Technology, which has overseen the network’s construction since 2005, “has acted in bad faith throughout the past year” and has made “defamatory and untrue statements regarding M/A-COM’s performance under the contract,” the letter said.

The largest technology contract in state history, the network has had problems from the start, according to state officials. In August, the state sent a default letter to M/A-COM ordering it to fix deficiencies or face cancellation. A decision to cancel the project has seemed imminent since then, and some state officials, and lawyers for the contractor, have spoken of it as a fait accompli.

The original plan, conceived after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, was designed to link emergency agencies from the tip of Long Island to Niagara Falls via a series of radio towers. The network was meant to cover 95 percent of New York’s area and 97 percent of its roadways, including some of the most remote parts of the state.

The Office for Technology is looking at other methods, including Internet-based communications and cellphone technology, that are said to be more cost-effective and could provide more reliable and cheaper service than the radio technology called for in the original contract.

Daniel M. De Federicis, the president of the Police Benevolent Association of the New York State Troopers, said that until a statewide radio network has been built, his organization would push for improvements in the present patchwork of networks.

“The lack of an operating statewide wireless network is beyond frustrating,” Mr. De Federicis said in a statement. “The P.B.A. cannot stress enough that this creates life-and-death situations for police officers (How??? He makes it sound as if Troopers are dropping dead in the streets because they don't have this "statewide" network.) and we are running out of synonyms for ‘ineptness’ to describe the situation.”

The project, which is now two years behind schedule, has faced questions from the outset. Critics questioned the Pataki administration’s decision to award the contract to M/A-COM, whose bid was $1 billion less than its closest major competitor, Motorola. (That should have told them something right there.....)

The radio system was supposed to be working in Erie County and neighboring Chautauqua County by June 2007, but repeated problems caused the City of Buffalo to quit the statewide system in December 2007.

M/A-COM missed other operational deadlines, finally prompting the Office for Technology to declare in August that the company was in default. The office gave the company 45 days to fix 19 deficiencies.

In their letter Friday, lawyers for the company said that all technological issues had been addressed and that any delays were the fault of the state.

During an 11-day test period in July, the network was found to be inoperable for nearly 44 hours, far more than the 53 minutes of downtime per year authorized by the state.

Since the state default letter was issued in August, some workers hired to build the network have been laid off, and several subcontractors have stopped work on the network.

In late August, the state comptroller, Thomas P. DiNapoli, issued a report criticizing the plan. The report noted that the “network testing was not properly planned or implemented, and the needs of the public safety user agencies were not fully taken into account during the network design and development process.” (Geez, what a shock! They didn't ask the people who are going to use it for input....again?)

Separately, M/A-COM agreed to pay the state $4 million after auditors found that the company had billed for services that had not been provided and charged for some equipment that had already been paid for.
A spokesman for M/A-COM, Steven A. Greenberg, said on Friday, “We remain ready to hear from the state, as we have since testing concluded last fall.”
 

N2ICV

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 14, 2002
Messages
614
Location
Gloucester County FM29in
Mt. Laurel:
217.5375 Yes pulse
217.6250 Yes pulse
217.6875 Yes pulse
217.8375*

Deptford:
217.5500 Yes pulse
217.6125 Yes pulse
217.7500
217.8500* Yes
 

mondaro

Member
Feed Provider
Joined
Mar 1, 2004
Messages
1,338
Location
Harrison, New Jersey
Monitoring the NJTP plows on simplex last night they said to switch to the new radios they have and the person responded the radios still do not work right. I wonder what they are going to do when the realize the 220 system is not going to work the there radio vendor sold them a bill of goods. unreal.

Tony
 

N2ICV

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 14, 2002
Messages
614
Location
Gloucester County FM29in
Monitoring the NJTP plows on simplex last night they said to switch to the new radios they have and the person responded the radios still do not work right. I wonder what they are going to do when the realize the 220 system is not going to work the there radio vendor sold them a bill of goods. unreal.

Tony

What freq. ? The vhf or uhf
 

GM

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
1,099
NJ GSP 220 System

What kind of equipment/toys/computer program is being used to hear the 220 MHZ LTR system? Are you hearing it in analog or digital mode? And are you hearing it in trunking mode or just conventional? I'll see what kind of digging into this I can get.
 

Highpockets

Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2003
Messages
3,876
Location
Toms River, New Jersey
What kind of equipment/toys/computer program is being used to hear the 220 MHZ LTR system? Are you hearing it in analog or digital mode? And are you hearing it in trunking mode or just conventional? I'll see what kind of digging into this I can get.

Right now I'm monitoring in conventional, analog.
 

fineshot1

Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2004
Messages
2,531
Location
NJ USA (Republic of NJ)
Depends on where you live, the freq's are listed up above in one of the earlier posts.

I know that. I was wondering in TR exactly what freqs he was hearing voice on.

This morning I had to take a ride to Tuckerton and I heard breifly a mobile unit talking to a base
on 217.6000 and data bursts on 217.8000 for TR. I heard the pulsing on all the freqs listed for
barnegat but did not hear anything significant to report their.
 

Highpockets

Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2003
Messages
3,876
Location
Toms River, New Jersey
I know that. I was wondering in TR exactly what freqs he was hearing voice on.

This morning I had to take a ride to Tuckerton and I heard breifly a mobile unit talking to a base
on 217.6000 and data bursts on 217.8000 for TR. I heard the pulsing on all the freqs listed for
barnegat but did not hear anything significant to report their.

I heard voice and data on the same two you mentioned, 217.6/217.8
 

N2DLX

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 21, 2008
Messages
240
Location
Hamilton, NJ
It's been a while on this topic, but I wanted to update everyone that the new TRS is up and running and apparently simulcasted with the existing UHF/VHF channels. Obviously Maintenance and Roads crews are on different talkgroups and aren't simulcasted together unless there's a system-wide broadcast being sent out.
 

fineshot1

Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2004
Messages
2,531
Location
NJ USA (Republic of NJ)
It's been a while on this topic, but I wanted to update everyone that the new TRS is up and running and apparently simulcasted with the existing UHF/VHF channels. Obviously Maintenance and Roads crews are on different talkgroups and aren't simulcasted together unless there's a system-wide broadcast being sent out.

Rich - tnx for the update. I kinda figured that was the case last time I posted on what I was hearing while listening with some of my ham 220mhz gear. The audio is of course low listening to it this way and there is not much to listen to either or so it seems.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top