How to improve NXDN scanning

Status
Not open for further replies.

AggieCon

Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2015
Messages
1,448
Location
Texas
Troy,

Very thorough post.

I think you are really onto something by asking everyone to provide more information. It would probably be good if something like that was made a sticky for the entire Whistler Forum: Radio, Firmware Versions, EZ Scan Version, PC OS, Call Sign, Frequency, how it's programmed, relative location to the system, antenna, etc.

I looked up the system you linked to. It has two frequencies listed as type-D and 4 as type-C. Which was doing both control and voice?

Removing the control channel with type-d probably will miss voice; but I am not sure those control channels are the ones slowing down the scanner.

Another thing to consider is constant data channels. I've seen licenses where a couple of the "trunked" frequencies aren't parts of the trunked system. Some even do non-stop data.

What we are somewhat missing is our own investigation. Whether you are copying from RR of DFS, everyone owes it to theirself to investigate each and every frequency they put into their scanner. And that starts with listening to each and analog FM mode to understand what's really going on with the frequency. Then you can start adding digital back in. Basically, if a frequency has constant digital buzz, and if you hear nothing when it is forced to digital, it is likely a data channel that you want to ignore.

On another topic, Whister can't have any issues with trunking DMR or NXDN because it doesn't do trunking.

At the end of the day, I think a lot of the problems are caused by silly scanner software. Last night, I did a test on an analog system.

When I monitored a talkgroup, the black box T was solid 100% of the time with no blinks at all. This was notable, because my scanner never holds the T like that. I tried scanning the system. Nope. Lots of blinking T. I tried scanning just that one frequency. It too, caused the T to blink on and off.

The point: The scanner should be smart enough to stay on to one system if only one system is being scanned, but it is obviously dropping and reacquiring the system non-stop. It makes me wonder what kind of shape all of the firmware is in. Perhaps all patched together with different functions having better performance? Or absolute errors in some areas that prevent the scanner from receiving at all?

Anyhow, what I am suggesting to others with the beginning of the tread is this: Much like you would lockout an annoying talkgroup, you should be removing from your scanner anything that you don't want to hear. Because those things are slowing down the scanner and might be causing problems. If there is a type-C system, you don't need the control channel. It's likely causing the radio to stumble every time it comes around. You'll also want to subtract data-only frequencies.
 

sparklehorse

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
May 15, 2003
Messages
1,219
Location
Portland, Oregon
<snip>

What I did see that caused alot of problems was if I had the squelch fully CCW.

<snip>

Also, keeping the squelch setting to a minimum (best I can explain there is about "half" or at the 12 o'clock position).
.

Is this on a TRX-1 or a TRX-2? I keep seeing these 'analog' references to the squelch setting, does the TRX-1 not display a squelch setting level? On my TRX-2 the display shows 'min' when all the way CCW, then levels 1-12 as you increase the squelch, then finally 'MAX' when all the way CW. The knob doesn't have an index mark on it, so "12 o'clock" has no relationship to anything on a TRX-2. If I were to set my squelch just above the threshold it would be at level 9. Is this about where your minimum is on the TRX-1, assuming it also displays squelch levels?

.
 

AggieCon

Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2015
Messages
1,448
Location
Texas
I don't think there is a way to see the squelch value on the handhelds, but the squelch is still digital. The knob is just a fancy addition to the scanners. The squelch is not analog.
 

KevinC

Encryption
Super Moderator
Joined
Jan 7, 2001
Messages
13,131
Location
I'm everywhere Focker!
To support Justin's theory of no trunk tracking try this...

Start the Whistler "Control Demo" application, wait for a TG to become active and pause on that TG. Watch the "Frequency" box and I bet it continues to sweep through all the frequencies you have in that system. This needs to done on a dedicated CC NXDN system.

I can confirm on Connect Plus it behaves this way as opposed to P25 trunked system where it will stay on the CC until a VC grant. I don't have a TRX-1/2 to test NXDN.

And sorry if someone already suggested this and I missed it.
 

kikito

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
2,603
Location
North Pole, Alaska
kikito: can you confirm you have seen Encryption being displayed on NXDN please? I have undertaken several tests and can't see this at all.

Yes, there's two different frequencies from Taxi Cab companies I believe that show Encryption full time. I still see the Radio IDs and other info just like with encrypted P25.

Why? You think is being mis-identified somehow?
 

kikito

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
2,603
Location
North Pole, Alaska
Just to confirm, I have my TRX-1 successfully decoding both Conventional NXDN4800 and NXDN9600 on Spectrum Sweeper and Limit Search. I can't comment on the trunked NXDN.

My comment about NXDN96 was alluding that it could be a possible problem mostly with certain 9600 systems/frequencies since you and several others with 4800 systems seem to work fine most of the time from what I can tell. Just trying to isolate further what I'm seeing in order to maybe provide better feedback to Whistler.
 

kikito

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
2,603
Location
North Pole, Alaska
What is your DSP version on the radio? With all the recent updates to everything this past week I would guess a few have forgotten to update the DSP that are having issues.

I just checked and using:

EZScan Version 3.1
DSP Version: 3.0
CPU Version: 5.0
Boot Version: F1.3

Software claims I have the latest on everything.
 

kikito

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
2,603
Location
North Pole, Alaska
Any chance that some of what people are not hearing voice on might be a data transmission?

I'm still going through your extensive message and trying out new things and ideas from it. Thanks for your input.

To answer your question above, in my case I can receive decoded NXDN voice when doing a Limit Search. But as soon as I program the system as trunked or even just the frequencies as conventional NXDN, it doesn't decode at all. Not while "trunk-tracking", not while scanning and not even while paused on a single frequency that's receiving something. Is like receiving it but it won't open squelch. Like either the type 4800/9600, or RAN or TG "sensing" is stuck to some default, keeping it from letting the voice through in any mode other than Limit Search.

It behaves equivalent to having an analog frequency programmed with a specific tone but receiving another so the radio doesn't open squelch even though you can tell is receiving a signal.
 

troymail

Silent Key
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
9,981
Location
Supply (Lockwood Inlet area), NC
Is this on a TRX-1 or a TRX-2? I keep seeing these 'analog' references to the squelch setting, does the TRX-1 not display a squelch setting level? On my TRX-2 the display shows 'min' when all the way CCW, then levels 1-12 as you increase the squelch, then finally 'MAX' when all the way CW. The knob doesn't have an index mark on it, so "12 o'clock" has no relationship to anything on a TRX-2. If I were to set my squelch just above the threshold it would be at level 9. Is this about where your minimum is on the TRX-1, assuming it also displays squelch levels?

.

Sorry - I should have been more specific. I was referring to the TRX-1 ... I was suggesting keeping the squelch at 12 o'clock.

On the TRX-2, I think the default using EZ Scan is "10". 7 or 8 is many times too lo for my area so I usually keep it at 10 or higher.

Reading through all the posts in the thread again - this is pretty interesting in some ways (but not in others). I was thinking we were zeroing in on something like NXDN96 being a problem but others are reporting that are receiving NXDN96 properly.

I love a challenge -- I love to visit areas where folks are seeing problems but Alaska is just a bit too far. Florida isn't as far but my next upcoming trip is to New Orleans... A further challenge is getting to the area where these systems are used during business hours since that's when most are likely to be active.

Given the variations of NXDN I've seen around my area, it would be great to see a screenshot of DSD+ receiving these problem systems and frequencies as an alternative to actually being there. The best I can do is start looking for other frequencies in my area that "claim to be" NXDN on their licenses (but many times are just wrong) to find something that my DSD+ setup can decode but the radio doesn't (I want to feel your pain so I can try to help figure out why they are a problem). I may find that there are some of these "problem systems" in my area - I just don't know it yet and am assuming they aren't NXDN!
 

racingfan360

Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2005
Messages
1,191
Yes, there's two different frequencies from Taxi Cab companies I believe that show Encryption full time. I still see the Radio IDs and other info just like with encrypted P25.

Why? You think is being mis-identified somehow?

Thanks for the confirmation kikito. I have now tested and observed with my own DMR/NXDN radios:
- Encryption correctly shows on encrypted Conventional NXDN48 and 96 when the channel is stored in memory and the channel scanned. It doesn't show on encrypted Conventional NXDN48 and 96 when conducting a Limit Search.

- Encryption doesn't show on encrypted DMR channels (either stored or via a Limit Search). It incorrectly shows the DG symbol too.

- Conventional NXDN96 (clear and encrypted) always incorrectly shows up as Trunked when the channel is stored in memory/scanned. It doesn't show as Trunked when the same channel is searched via Limit Search.

- Conventional NXDN48 (clear and encrypted) always incorrectly flickers up the Trunked symbol when the channel is stored in memory/scanned, and incorectly shows the DG symbol. It doesn't show as Trunked or show the DG symbol when the same channel is searched via Limit Search.

- I would also be interested in any observations on the Global Blink Time (line 1 and 2) function on NXDN channels that have been programmed into memory. It appears that the Blink Time values are ignored and they default to a very short interval period (maybe 0.75 sec?) which makes reading the TGID and ID values very difficult. It seems to work ok on DMR and Analogue channels.

Interested in any confirmations or contradictions before I submit bug reports to Whistler.

Note also using:
EZScan Version 3.1
DSP Version: 3.0
CPU Version: 5.0
 

kikito

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
2,603
Location
North Pole, Alaska
Thanks for the confirmation kikito. I have now tested and observed with my own DMR/NXDN radios:
- Encryption correctly shows on encrypted Conventional NXDN48 and 96 when the channel is stored in memory and the channel scanned. It doesn't show on encrypted Conventional NXDN48 and 96 when conducting a Limit Search.

That's different for me. On my Limit Search on the 450MHz band, it does show Encrypted conventionally. But maybe the frequencies I'm finding like that on the Limit Search aren't truly conventional? Sometimes they show "NXDN96-D".

- I would also be interested in any observations on the Global Blink Time (line 1 and 2) function on NXDN channels that have been programmed into memory. It appears that the Blink Time values are ignored and they default to a very short interval period (maybe 0.75 sec?) which makes reading the TGID and ID values very difficult. It seems to work ok on DMR and Analogue channels.

Yes, I can confirm this also. I can never tell what the TG is because how it flickers constantly.
 

racingfan360

Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2005
Messages
1,191
That's different for me. On my Limit Search on the 450MHz band, it does show Encrypted conventionally. But maybe the frequencies I'm finding like that on the Limit Search aren't truly conventional? Sometimes they show "NXDN96-D"

Thanks .....unfortunately I don't have any local NXDN trunked signals to test with to confirm. The only other thing I can think of is that all my NXDN encryption tests are undertaken using Direct/Simplex comms, and not repeaters (which I assume is what you're tuned to?).
 

daredevil1

Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2006
Messages
65
My comment about NXDN96 was alluding that it could be a possible problem mostly with certain 9600 systems/frequencies since you and several others with 4800 systems seem to work fine most of the time from what I can tell. Just trying to isolate further what I'm seeing in order to maybe provide better feedback to Whistler.

I'm monitoring 4800 programmed as conventional and it's breaking up mid conversation. It's the only thing I'm monitoring.
 

sibbley

Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2013
Messages
1,532
Location
Nazareth, Pennsylvania
The NXDN 9600 system I am trying to monitor will grab the hit with NO audio, record the hit, with NO audio, while dsd+ has the entire conversation. I have dsd+ and the TRX-2 scanning the same frequencies programmed as conventional. When I hold on an active frequency, dsd+ is decoding and the TRX-2 shows it's receiving but has no audio. I'd like to get a video, but it's very slow today. Maybe tomorrow will be more active.

I've had decent luck with a 4800 system programed as conventional, but that system is not very busy at all.
 

kikito

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
2,603
Location
North Pole, Alaska
The NXDN 9600 system I am trying to monitor will grab the hit with NO audio, record the hit, with NO audio, while dsd+ has the entire conversation. I have dsd+ and the TRX-2 scanning the same frequencies programmed as conventional. When I hold on an active frequency, dsd+ is decoding and the TRX-2 shows it's receiving but has no audio. I'd like to get a video, but it's very slow today. Maybe tomorrow will be more active.

I've had decent luck with a 4800 system programed as conventional, but that system is not very busy at all.

That's pretty similar to what I'm seeing here also. It's looking more and more like there's a few bugs on both 4800 and 9600 decoding but is worst on 9600 systems.
 

W4KRR

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Apr 1, 2001
Messages
3,529
Location
Coconut Creek
That's pretty similar to what I'm seeing here also. It's looking more and more like there's a few bugs on both 4800 and 9600 decoding but is worst on 9600 systems.

NXDN 4800 system here, no 9600 systems that I'm aware of. IMO, programming these trunked sites as conventional yields no better results than if they were programmed as trunked. This is with leaving the control channel out. I still see a lot of dropping conversations in mid sentence, and missed replies. Often, when the conversation drops out, I hear a very faint popping noise where I should be hearing voice.
 

MichaelBhere

Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2015
Messages
151
Some have suggested deleting the control channel and the issue went away. I do not have any NXDN near me so I cannot confirm.
 

scosgt

Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2004
Messages
1,295
I did as suggested and ran the demo program while "trunking" a DMR system. I agree, it does NOT trunk (don't have a TRX to test NXDN).
However, who cares! I can now receive a ton of stuff I could not hear before, and with a 2 second delay, I do seem to hear the responses.
It's all good.
 

KD4YGG

Active Member
Database Admin
Joined
Jan 30, 2001
Messages
2,043
Would it make sense that the frequencies need to be entered in a specific order to allow the TRX-1 to follow conversations correctly on NXDN?


One of the regional DMR systems I monitored today wouldn't follow conversations on either the TRX-1 or BCD325P2 (upgraded) at the start.

It behaved like an EDACS system that wasn't programmed correctly.

Display would flash TGRPs but wouldn't unmute.


The frequency LCN order was in descending frequency order versus the correct ascending frequency order.

Reprogrammed both radios and both performed flawlessly.


Perhaps NXDN requires the same.

Have noticed the NXDN systems in the database now have an "order" field associated with them when you click on the site name.


A lot of us are not remembering how it was in the BC235XLT and BC245XLT days...

We've embarked on a similar journey of new discovery and we'll have to work on figuring things out !!!

Just glad I don't have to haul a laptop around with DSD+.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top