ICI Trunked System - Posts your new findings here!

[icis_monitor]

I was csanning and units identifiying as bell pd were coming up on tg 40272 on the pasadena icis. i know that pasadena and bell are working together on vhf but did this include bringing them onto icis? could this be part of the sgv jpa that is being talked about here?

 

[Radio_Lady]

If its a BYO frequencies... Glendora,Azusa,Covina and Irwindale have vhf frequencies. So that will not work....im just saying. So where is ICIS going to pull from ?

Don't forget that the County of Los Angeles got ALL of TV channel 15's several hundred frequency pairs a couple years ago and almost immediately, if not before, "loaned" several frequencies to Pasadena for their use. It's possible they will do the same for other cities. In the long run, what's good for ICIS and its individual members will redound to LASD's benefit either directly or indirectly.

 

[scottyhetzel]

Don't forget that the County of Los Angeles got ALL of TV channel 15's several hundred frequencies pairs a couple years ago and almost immediately, if not before, "loaned" several to Pasadena for their use. It's possible they will do the same for other cities. In the long run, what's good for ICIS and its individual members will redound to LASD's benefit either directly or indirectly.

That makes sense radiolady....thank you for clarifying. I did not relize there were several hundred freq. i figured the spectrum is pretty full.

 

[LAflyer]

tg 40272

Pasadena P25 TG's have 4-digit Dec numbering.

Anyhow, don't forget the Bell PD VHF frequency was recently acquired from Pasadena who I believe used it for public works prior.

Don't forget that the County of Los Angeles got ALL of TV channel 15's several hundred frequency pairs a couple years ago and almost immediately, if not before, "loaned" several frequencies to Pasadena for their use. It's possible they will do the same for other cities. In the long run, what's good for ICIS and its individual members will redound to LASD's benefit either directly or indirectly.

Yes except for the case of the SGV JPA the frequencies being used are the ones leased by Glendora and posed in reply 773 and have nothing to do with LACo.

 

[karldotcom]

I heard some of this last weekend....seems kind of strange...but it sounded like a patch. Maybe they are just testing the concept out.

I was csanning and units identifiying as bell pd were coming up on tg 40272 on the pasadena icis. i know that pasadena and bell are working together on vhf but did this include bringing them onto icis? could this be part of the sgv jpa that is being talked about here?

 

[jazzbassNick]

Just picked up Monrovia FD Admin doing test blabbing on Radio IDs 47187 & 47189.

Note to DB folks, the alpha tag is misspelled as Monravia

 

[bangel]

On the Glendale site, TGID 33216 (HEAR Patch), I can hear Orange County Communication Center is doing a lot of interoperability-type radio tests with many agencies, asking what channel they are coming in on - I've heard responses of VMED28 and Mutual Aid 5. Some agencies are either not responding or not being patched into ICIS. They've mentioned some repeater sites as well.

 

[jazzbassNick]

A few new (to me, couldn't find anywhere) TGs on the Glendale site today:
36720
39424 (As both encrypted and non-encrypted)
33824
33456

I think 33456 has popped up before as encrypted, but not sure.
Using Trunk88 w/2 dongles and dsd - haven't caught enough speech to help determine, but I'm guessing it may have had something to do with the quake drill.

 

[LAflyer]

Read in the ICIS minutes that they are hoping to have the SGV site on the air and begin testing in December.

 

[tsalmrsystemtech]

Read in the ICIS minutes that they are hoping to have the SGV site on the air and begin testing in December.

Would you happen to have the link to the ICIS minutes

 

[jazzbassNick]

Would you happen to have the link to the ICIS minutes

ICIS - Interagency Communications Interoperability System

 

[tsalmrsystemtech]

Thanks I was on the ICIS site but I guess I did not browse enough to find the notes, but thanks

 

[jazzbassNick]

Thanks I was on the ICIS site but I guess I did not browse enough to find the notes, but thanks

I had just got done reading the minutes, so the link was still in my browser. Good timing

 

[tsalmrsystemtech]

Montebello Site

I noticed that Culver City PD and Burbank PD are using the Montebello Trunk Site now. Here are all of the talkgroups so far on this site. Pretty Nice. I ran Trunk88 again tonight and noticed a few more talkgroups added to this site.

33056 AIR CALL
33456 Unknown
33488 Glendale PD
33616 Verdugo Red1
33632 Verdugo Red2
33648 Verdugo Red3
33664 Verdugo Red4
33680 Verdugo Red5
33696 Verdugo RED15
33712 Verdugo Red6
33968 S Pasadena PD
34336 Elmars Air Tac
34432 SMPD DSP
34448 SMPD TACT
34480 PD Joint Task
36752 Mont PD DSP
36768 Mont PD TACT
36784 Mont PD DET
36832 Montebello Det
37056 Mont Sch PD
37232 Mont Pub Saf
37328 Mont Prk Rang
37408 Mont Pub Wrks
37680 Pomona PD DSP
39056 Mont Bus
39440 Pasadena PD DSP
40560 Pasadena SPCA
40880 Unknown
65376 ICIS MA10
65392 ICIS MA 1
65408 ICIS MA 2
33728 Verdugo Red 7
33840 Verdugo Red 8
33856 Verdugo Red 9
37040 Mont USD
39088 Mont Bus Mx
38128 Culver City PD
34576 Burbank PD

 

[jazzbassNick]

Hey all,
Was reviewing the stats in Trunk88 (monitoring the Glendale site) and saw this:

1 new zone channel:
[F108-1 561 482.31250]

Should I submit to the database based on that or get more clarification?

I haven't actually seen any activity on it yet, but it's early.

Thanks,
N

 

[karldotcom]

Isn't that a Montebello frequency? Sometimes these trunking programs collect bad data, so until you see it being used consistently, and confirm it via your scanner, I would hold off on submitting it.

edit: I am not seeing that LCN on my Unitrunker right now...

Hey all,
Was reviewing the stats in Trunk88 (monitoring the Glendale site) and saw this:

1 new zone channel:
[F108-1 561 482.31250]

Should I submit to the database based on that or get more clarification?

I haven't actually seen any activity on it yet, but it's early.

Thanks,
N

 

[jazzbassNick]

Isn't that a Montebello frequency? Sometimes these trunking programs collect bad data, so until you see it being used consistently, and confirm it via your scanner, I would hold off on submitting it.

edit: I am not seeing that LCN on my Unitrunker right now...

Good call, that is indeed a Montebello frequency - saw the bus line using it when I changed zones to Montebello. Weird that popped up like that. Checked out the comms count for that channel just now too. Montebello: 3164, Glendale: 1.

Thanks for the help
N

 

[LAflyer]

I've had the future SGV site frequencies programmed for the last few weeks, and its interesting to note that several frequencies are pretty busy with users, some with rather strong signals pumping out across much of LA basin.

I believe it will be interesting to see if or how this effects the ICIS use, or even use by existing licensees on these frequencies.

I always though utilizing business band frequencies seemed like a bit of an odd move for public safety agency.

 

[jazzbassNick]

@LAflyer

Are the future SGV site freqs somewhere? Wouldn't mind taking a look.

 

[LAflyer]

Posted back in Reply 733 of this thread.