ICI Trunked System - Posts your new findings here!

RobertW1

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Nov 14, 2004
Messages
241
Location
Burbank, CA
Heard something interesting while heading up to the Starlight Bowl for the Fab Four Concert yesterday.

An Officer who was getting ready to work the event told Dispatch that he can't find the "Events" channel, TG 34704, in his radio and asks Dispatch if she knows what channel it's on. Dispatch comes back and says that they can't find it either and believes it was left out with the latest Radio programming or upgrade.

The Officer replies, "It never worked very well anyway. They probably just got rid of it. We'll go ahead and use the Traffic channel". They were then heard on the "Motors (Traffic)" channel, TG 34656.

Perhaps the Events TG has disappeared or been retired, as has the first Dispatch channel after they had been on ICIS for awhile.
 
Last edited:

karldotcom

Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2003
Messages
1,852
Location
Burbank, CA
Thats funny.

I don't see how one talkgroup could not come in as good as the rest. You are right, I havent heard that talkgroup in a while....with regards to the Starlight Bowl, one week they would use the Traffic (Motors) TG, the next the Events TG....I guess it depended on who was running the detail that night?

2992 is still in some radios...you see it pop up from time to time.
 

karldotcom

Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2003
Messages
1,852
Location
Burbank, CA
I came in this morning and saw a bunch of triple digit talk groups in my Glendale Unitrunker file....looked like the Culver City TGs to me.... (352 to 848)

System 7 ctrl channel is also up on 482.5625
 

karldotcom

Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2003
Messages
1,852
Location
Burbank, CA
These are the talkgroups I have noticed testing activity on the past few weeks, and any names people mentioned. Might all change when these systems go live.

Culver City

7536 Culver City
7568 Culver City
7600 Culver City
7632 Culver City
7664 Culver City
7696 Culver City
7728 Culver City
7760 Culver City
7856 Culver City
7984 Culver City
8080 Culver City
8224 Culver City
8464 Culver City
8720 Culver City
9232 Culver City

Beverly Hills

35952
35968
35984
36000 Blue 8
36016
36032 Detectives
36160
36176
36192
36208
36224
36240
36256
36320 Beverly Hills 1
36416
36432
36448
36480
36496
36512
36640
36656
36688
36704
36720
36736
36800
36816
36832
36848
36880
36976
37456
37472
 

karldotcom

Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2003
Messages
1,852
Location
Burbank, CA
System 7 partially online

A lot of Culver City Building Maintenance communications going on today on System 7. Appears these folks have moved over to the new system, while public safety is still on 7E21.
 

karldotcom

Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2003
Messages
1,852
Location
Burbank, CA
Burbank and Glendale Seek Link - Article on ICIS / RICS

Burbank, Glendale seek link

subhead.gif
Response system would allow safety departments to communicate across jurisdictional lines.


By Chris Wiebe
BURBANK — The future of a multi-agency response system in Burbank and Glendale is safe, even as Los Angeles County is pursuing a countywide network of its own.

Conflict arose earlier this year as it became apparent that Burbank, Glendale and four other cities participating in the Interagency Communications Interoperability System, known as ICIS — which allows public safety departments to communicate across jurisdictional lines — were competing against the county for federal funding.

While county officials are seeking money for a planned network — called the Los Angeles Regional Interoperable Communications System — local system participants are also vying for federal help to finance maintenance and upgrades for an infrastructure that has been in place since 2003. That bred uncertainty among legislators in Washington, D.C., as competing requests came in from county and local officials pursuing similar technologies with similar goals in the same area.

But last week, a contingent of local system participants traveled to the capital with Los Angeles County Fire Chief Paul Michael Freeman to better define the city and county's shared perspective.

The joint trip sent a constructive, positive message that the two agencies are working together, said Glendale Fire Department Battalion Chief Don Wright, executive director of the local system.

"I really felt that because we had Chief Freeman with us, that we were able to show, No. 1, the hard work we've done in the past, and No. 2 … we are carrying the message that we intend to be part of a much larger regional network — we are not looking to be empire builders of the ICIS radio system," Wright said. "And I think that's been the common misconception for a while."

And the delegation's trip to Washington, D.C., gave city and county officials the opportunity to become acquainted with their counterparts, Freeman said.

"I felt that the trip was very positive," he said. "And I thought it was timely because it certainly was a personification of the cooperative efforts that are being undertaken here locally."

The common ground that local and county officials have reached means that municipalities can continue to use their local system and bring other agencies aboard, while also supporting the county's efforts to create a regional system, said Burbank Mayor Marsha Ramos, who was a member of the contingent that traveled to the capital.

"For the first time we are two trains, and we are looking to converge on the same path and literally link those two trains together so that all of our communities are served," she said. "And that is probably the most efficient and effective way to use our resources wisely."

For the local system, that means tapping federal funds to update existing technology with Project 25 compliance, which is the industry standard for public safety radio systems, Wright said.

"By migrating toward Project 25, we obviously would fit the mold of that standard, which would make it more likely that our investment would be reutilized by the larger system," he said.

To date, the six participating cities have invested $59 million into the local system, which serves 11 square miles and 700,000 residents in Beverly Hills, Culver City, Montebello, Pomona, Burbank and Glendale.

"We're doing the best thing we can with dollars," Wright said. "We're staying as agile as we possibly can and … we definitely will be a part of whatever a bigger network is."

The progress came as welcome news to Los Angeles County Supervisor Michael Antonovich, said Tony Bell, a spokesman for Antonovich's office. In March, Antonovich fielded concerns from the Burbank City Council that pursuing a countywide system could eclipse strides already made on local systems.

The planning stages of the larger, countywide network are underway, with county officials working closely with the cities of Los Angeles and Long Beach to release a report at the beginning of 2008 about the details of the system, he said.

"Supervisor Antonovich's office is pleased that the county is working together with the cities to develop a coordinated strategy for public safety intercommunication for the region," he said.
 

glradio

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 13, 2003
Messages
72
Location
OES Region 1 Area C
landonjensen said:
Any idea when the Verdugo switches over to ICIS? I would like a headup so I can buy my new scanner.....

Our target date is October 1, 2007. It could always slip, but that's the date we're shooting for.
 

todd818

Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2006
Messages
35
Location
Los Angeles, CA
Some Culver City TGIDs also being simulcast on the Burbank and/or Glendale systems. Nice to hear Culver City like they're right outside my house. :)
 

todd818

Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2006
Messages
35
Location
Los Angeles, CA
Of course, I post those IDs without first checking out the Database. Those, and more have been updated on the ICIS page.

Love this site!
 

chet-

Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2006
Messages
55
Of course I could be wrong but with a little math and guesses. I am going to guess the Verdugo lineup will be: Drumroll ........

Red 1 33616
Red 2 33632
Red 3 33648
Red 4 33664
Red 5 33680
Red 6 33696

Now watch them change everything LOL

Chet
 

karldotcom

Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2003
Messages
1,852
Location
Burbank, CA
Bold post!

I will raise ya

35504 Burbank Fire
35520 Burbank Fire
35536 Burbank Fire
35552 Burbank Fire
35568 Burbank Fire
35584 Burbank Fire
35600 Burbank Fire
35616 Burbank Fire
35632 Burbank Fire Logistics
35648 Burbank Disaster Services
 
Last edited:

icis_monitor

Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2006
Messages
123
I've been hearing a lot on the scanner and am wondering why would they move from 12 chans to 6 on the new system? I think the thought that there would be common channels for all depts and lots for each makes a whole more lot of sence.

chet- said:
Of course I could be wrong but with a little math and guesses. I am going to guess the Verdugo lineup will be: Drumroll ........

Red 1 33616
Red 2 33632
Red 3 33648
Red 4 33664
Red 5 33680
Red 6 33696

Now watch them change everything LOL

Chet

karldotcom said:
Bold post!

I will raise ya

35504 Burbank Fire
35520 Burbank Fire
35536 Burbank Fire
35552 Burbank Fire
35568 Burbank Fire
35584 Burbank Fire
35600 Burbank Fire
35616 Burbank Fire
35632 Burbank Fire Logistics
35648 Burbank Disaster Services
 

icis_monitor

Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2006
Messages
123
ICIS Talkgroups for Verdugo Fire

So who has the information? As much as i love trying to figure it out it would be nice to have a definiteive list.

karldotcom said:
You will have far more TALKGROUPS than current VERDUGO channels currently.
 

chet-

Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2006
Messages
55
icis_monitor said:
So who has the information? As much as i love trying to figure it out it would be nice to have a definiteive list.

The radio techs, but they can't share it. I believe the only way to get it is to figure it out or if someone is lucky get a look at one of the radios and scroll thought the talkgroups. That won't give us the talkgroups so to speak but the labels to go along with them. Then it would be a matter of putting the tgs and the labels together.

But in reality I think we will just have to hunt and find them. In some ways thats half the fun. For my photo gig all I really need is the dispatch, the rest are for fun. Good hunting.

Chet
 

glradio

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 13, 2003
Messages
72
Location
OES Region 1 Area C
Until we encrypt it. Just kidding!!! Yes, there will be more TG's than we have channels currently.

chet- said:
But in reality I think we will just have to hunt and find them. In some ways thats half the fun. For my photo gig all I really need is the dispatch, the rest are for fun. Good hunting.

Chet
 

RobertW1

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Nov 14, 2004
Messages
241
Location
Burbank, CA
glradio said:
Until we encrypt it. Just kidding!!! Yes, there will be more TG's than we have channels currently.

Are you still on target for the Oct 1st implementation date?
 
Top