mjthomas59
Member
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2006
- Messages
- 510
Just do the "in-crowd" thing, operate on GMRS w/ 5watts without a license. Millions are doing it, why not you??
Someone else goes in the other direction and tells him to just do the "in crowd thing" and operate illegaly without a license.
I highly recommend using 167.5625.
It gets mad propagation.
ok sorry. anyway, I still plan to do it.
I highly recommend using 167.5625.
It gets mad propagation.
While I agree that it's not quite on par with tearing the tag off of your mattress, I would disagree with the validity of your analogy.As far as legality, the way I see it, big deal. You are not causing malicious interference. It's like going 5 over down the street.
You really think he's still reading? :lol:
He came here with a plan that he intended to pursue, and had no intention of accepting any substitutes. We're not willing to play his game, so he's going to take his football and go home. It's the New York way.
Like others have said if the FCC is not going to enforce then why not break them. I am sorry but I am sick of the insane amount of government in everything.
Why the heck does somebody need to regulate the em waves. To me that seems insane, its the same as a goverment agency regulating waves in a ocean or the wind. Its kind of ridiculous.
I simply thought, if ya add a bit more juice to the transmitter, that it may go a tad further. No harm no foul. But I guess I am to stupid to do that also, at least the govt thinks so.
As to could I do it myself, sure, im a EE, Im sure I could think of something. But why if there are already known working mods.
In all seriousness, I would rather doubt that the FCC would be going after someone who used a 5 watt HT on an FRS frequency. It's unlikely to bother anyone with enough clout to wake the FCC up from their nap. But as to why they should be regulated at all, read up on the history of early radio. The FCC and it's predecessor were born out of necessity.
Comparing the airwaves with the wind and the waves is nonsensical and ridiculous.
You're part right. You could increase the applied voltage to the transmitter and it would probably produce more power... but not much. And it would probably exceed the ratings of the components, and cause premature failure. But your idea is even less practical than that. Where is this "more juice" going to come from? More batteries? Where are you going to put them? How much more power do you need? 1/2 db? 1 db? 3? 6? Do you have any clue?
An EE, huh? Ahem... I have serious doubts. You write at a 6th grade level, and your critical thinking skills are apparently about the same. I was going to ignore this thread until you said that. Please don't claim to be something you're not. If you really were, you'd already know the futility of trying to modify FRS radios by adding " a bit more juice"
the way I see it, big deal. You are not causing malicious interference. It's like going 5 over down the street.
I simply thought, if ya add a bit more juice to the transmitter, that it may go a tad further. No harm no foul. But I guess I am to stupid to do that also, at least the govt thinks so.
As an EE, you should be well aware of where the FRS channels fall in the spectrum and should understand the consequences of spatter.VECTOR-77 said:Like others have said if the FCC is not going to enforce then why not break them. I am sorry but I am sick of the insane amount of government in everything. Why the heck does somebody need to regulate the em waves. To me that seems insane, its the same as a goverment agency regulating waves in a ocean or the wind. Its kind of ridiculous.
It would indeed go farther. However, the mods required to make that happen are hardly cost-effective.VECTOR-77 said:I simply thought, if ya add a bit more juice to the transmitter, that it may go a tad further.
If this was CB, that might be true. In that particular corner of UHF, I would not be so sure about the "no harm" part of your theory.VECTOR-77 said:No harm no foul.
Based on what I have read here, I would go along with the government's opinion.VECTOR-77 said:But I guess I am to stupid to do that also, at least the govt thinks so.
I would expect mods to be hard to find as anyone with the expertise to figure a mod out would also know the futility of it.VECTOR-77 said:As to could I do it myself, sure, im a EE, Im sure I could think of something. But why if there are already known working mods.
Where does this 700% figure come from? According to my understanding, we are talking about 9 dB gain. A noticeable increase in range, but hardly 7 (or 8) times the distance.While I agree that it's not quite on par with tearing the tag off of your mattress, I would disagree with the validity of your analogy.
0.5 watts to 4 watts is an seven-hundred percent increase in power, which represents eight times the legal limit. That's like going four hundred miles per hour in a fifty mile per hour zone. I assure you that there is no cop or court that will think that's "no big deal". :lol:
.5 to 4 would be an eight fold increase, which would be 700%.kd7rto said:Where does this 700% figure come from?
Agreed. It would also not be a small mod as there is almost certainly nothing in there that could handle 4 watts.kd7rto said:According to my understanding, we are talking about 9 dB gain. A noticeable increase in range, but hardly 7 (or 8) times the distance.
That would be a bit of a stretch.kd7rto said:I would also question whether the danger of a speeding car, and the danger of an over-powered handheld transmitter, are in any way comparable.