At this point, my biggest hindrance in exploring this radio further is that The State of Connecticut has not certified it for use on the State's system.
THAT'S JUST NOT RIGHT! I do see the bugs both on the KNG and the M150 line. Very frustrating but workable. As for selling used as new, that Dealer should be dealt with. The BKR9000 is debuted on their website, so go look and see what has changed. Notice the PTT is similar to the batwind. Otherwise besides the ALL BAND, the programming is close to the KNG and BKR5000.Are they trying to beat motorolas and kenwoods price at all band? If not they won't go far.
None the less I have seen nothing but issues from the kng line with a county next door and the users sick of bk. I've heard excuses from firmware to bugs to the dealer was selling refurbished as new to the agency. Who knows.
The Dealers are suppose to receive their radios (if they ordered them and IF they passed the qualifying test) in January. Mine are shipping Jan. 13th. KB is accepting orders like you said.Talked to my dealer yesterday, and I was told. They are currently accepting orders for the 9000, but not to expect delivery till after January 1.
None the less I have seen nothing but issues from the kng line with a county next door and the users sick of bk.
Sounds like the new Kenwood Viking all band will be upgradeable to add DMRI am really not happy with DMR not happening now. Will probably go with Harris XL2/400 line of radios for our upgrades
I am really not happy with DMR not happening now. Will probably go with Harris XL2/400 line of radios for our upgrades
? The Harris doesn't do DMR, either.
If you need DMR, P25 and Multiband, you probably need the Kenwood VP8000, or the new Tait TP9800. The Kenwood is supposed to get DMR soon, and Tait mentioned the same thing.
Never heard Harris say anything about adding DMR to the XL line.
A follow up question for you on the narrowband wideband discussion I initiated about the 9000 being able to still do 5 khz deviation. Are not some 800 systems still operating in 25 khz wideband albeit with a reduction to 4 khz instead of 5 but still not a true 2.5 khz narrowband spec? If that is the case wouldn't the 9000 need to retain the wideband emission capability ? (at least to 4 khz practically speaking and I do ).I think he's probably asking about if it'll have some sort of option for 5KHz deviation on VHF/UHF for those that want to use it on Amateur radio, GMRS and/or marine band
Currently, the answer is "no".
Only shows narrow band analog and P25 as emission designators. Does not show 16K0F3E (except on 800/900MHz), so unless they made a mistake here too, there is no wide band on VHF or UHF.
Also, only shows Part 90, so won't be 'legal' for use on Marine (Part 80) or GMRS (Part 95). Yeah, I know "Everyone" ignores that part of the rules….
A follow up question for you on the narrowband wideband discussion I initiated about the 9000 being able to still do 5 khz deviation. Are not some 800 systems still operating in 25 khz wideband albeit with a reduction to 4 khz instead of 5 but still not a true 2.5 khz narrowband spec? If that is the case wouldn't the 9000 need to retain the wideband emission capability ? (at least to 4 khz practically speaking and I do get the Part 90 issue and the FCC designations ).I think he's probably asking about if it'll have some sort of option for 5KHz deviation on VHF/UHF for those that want to use it on Amateur radio, GMRS and/or marine band
Currently, the answer is "no".
Only shows narrow band analog and P25 as emission designators. Does not show 16K0F3E (except on 800/900MHz), so unless they made a mistake here too, there is no wide band on VHF or UHF.
Also, only shows Part 90, so won't be 'legal' for use on Marine (Part 80) or GMRS (Part 95). Yeah, I know "Everyone" ignores that part of the rules….
A follow up question for you on the narrowband wideband discussion I initiated about the 9000 being able to still do 5 khz deviation. Are not some 800 systems still operating in 25 khz wideband albeit with a reduction to 4 khz instead of 5 but still not a true 2.5 khz narrowband spec? If that is the case wouldn't the 9000 need to retain the wideband emission capability ? (at least to 4 khz practically speaking and I do get the Part 90 issue and the FCC designations ).
I agree, that's kind of what I was getting at if they had made some bands specifically wideband
I was wondering about the Kenwood's whether they had retained that ability for the new radio's coming out such as the VP8000. Are you able to still get a wideband license for their software provided you show proof of need?
I don't know. Haven't tried.
Isn't that basically a nationwide issue? In Colorado we have a Statewide system with numerous sites that use 700, although most are 800. I'm guessing most states are the same. As I recall the new NM system is primarily if not exclusively 700. I don't see why BK wouldn't already have that taken care of. 7/800 trunked systems aren't exactly brand new lol ......I can't even explore the BKR9000 after all these years of waiting to see if it was going to exist and be viable. There apparently remains an issue with FCC certification in the 700mhz band. Additionally, the radio remains unauthorized for use on The State of Connecticut Land Mobile Radio Network (CLMRN) ... ugh !!