First off, it's dynamic dual mode, not dual dynamic mode. Second off, while DDM would be a convenient migration path, it doubles the cost of implementation. If you have an official source for your claims, I would love to see it. Remember about a decade ago, VIPER did the impossible and converted the state from 3600 to 9600 in one week; I could absolutely see another case of ripping the band-aid off and converting as much as possible to pure TDMA in an effort to be good stewards of the tax payer dollars. Don't take this as a claim that DDM won't potentially be systemwide, but I know some county and state agencies are ready to flip the switch today, so I would bet in areas where TDMA is already available and in testing (yes, it's already out there) we may see TGs cutover before the deadline.