12dbsinad
Member
- Joined
- Mar 15, 2010
- Messages
- 2,005
Good. Then what exactly are you arguing about?i am not saying i am not for one.
Good. Then what exactly are you arguing about?i am not saying i am not for one.
What's he going to do? Probably deal with it. But he'll hope for the best.again the question is what are you going to do if nypd only gives access to the media and not the public at all . just because all these people want access does not mean there going to just give it to the general public
The New York City council and the New York State senators as well as neighborhood watchdog groups neighborhood safety groups and the citizens app are requesting access to the general public with a 10 minute to a 30-minute delay depending on who you're asking... What are we going to do? We're going to rely on City and State lawmakers as well as attorneys to determine the outcome of this situation. Ultimately is the responsibility of the city of New York to answer these potential lawsuits or city and state legislations.... It's not up to the NYPD, doesn't matter how much they huff and puff or what they say....again the question is what are you going to do if nypd only gives access to the media and not the public at all . just because all these people want access does not mean there going to just give it to the general public
ok but what if they dont decide to do a app . again thats is totally a nypd call not any of these people can make that call. what are you going to do if thats the case no delayed feed but only media accessThe New York City council and the New York State senators as well as neighborhood watchdog groups neighborhood safety groups and the citizens app are requesting access to the general public with a 10 minute to a 30-minute delay depending on who you're asking... What are we going to do? We're going to rely on City and State lawmakers as well as attorneys to determine the outcome of this situation.
i am just trying to get him to understand just because a group of citizens law makers want a delayed feed that that is nypd call not the group. i said from day one that media should have access in some form .Good. Then what exactly are you arguing about?
There are many layers of legal responsibility, just like any other legal issue, if the legislation by the state or the city is determined to be valid, you go with that... If you win a lawsuit in court you go with that, if you don't win a lawsuit in court you can always go to the appellate division and appeal, and just like some other entities, if you're not happy with the decision of the appellate court, you can appeal it all the way to the supreme Court if they will take the case....ok but what if they dont decide to do a app . again thats is totally a nypd call not any of these people can make that call
It's not the call of the NYPD. It is the call of the New York State legislature, New York City council, and ultimately the city of New York with their attorneys..... But ultimately it is the call of the court, if challenged....i am just trying to get him to understand just because a group of citizens law makers want a delayed feed that that is nypd call not the group. i said from day one that media should have access in some form .
wait a second nypd has contol of the system. not the courts or lawyers. so the next question is what if it goes to the supreme court and they say no feed . whats the next step . file another law suit and loose more moneyThere are many layers of legal responsibility, just like any other legal issue, if the legislation by the state or the city is determined to be valid, you go with that... If you win a lawsuit in court you go with that, if you don't win a lawsuit in court you can always go to the appellate division and appeal, and just like some other entities, if you're not happy with the decision of the appellate court, you can appeal it all the way to the supreme Court if they will take the case....
richee2000
oh really your the one that will not answer any questions that have been asked to you .
i am very happy with my life i devoted 28 years to protect inbreads like you that think beacause what u want your going to get.
let richee2000 make a scene and richee gets what he wants . i wish i could live in your fantasy world.
so why dont u answer the dam question i asked you or are u just to stupid to come up with a decent answer
Wrong. The City Of New York is responsbile for The Actions , budget, and legal costs relating to the actions of The NYPD.wait a second nypd has contol of the system. not the courts or lawyers. so the next question is what if it goes to the supreme court and they say no feed . whats the next step . file another law suit and loose more money
ok fine what ever . so the next question is what if it goes to the supreme court and they say no feed . whats the next step . file another law suit and loose more moneyWrong. The City Of New York is responsbile for The Actions , budget, and legal costs relating to the actions of The NYPD
agreedThis is not going to end well I see a thread closed and or bans if this does not stop.
Hopefully not. I do miss the days of more moderator "knock it off's" vs. the new age instant hammer once a mod reads it. But I understand that takes manpower.This is not going to end well I see a thread closed and or bans if this does not stop.
Senatorial bills introduced, City Council meetings to discuss, Media attorneys working on potential lawsuits, community groups discussing next steps, etc... but, since full citywide E will take place end of next year, there is plenty of time......Hopefully not. I do miss the days of more moderator "knock it off's" vs. the new age instant hammer once a mod reads it. But I understand that takes manpower.
Rich, for those us following this, what are the next steps of events, any idea? Do you know of any board meetings to discuss this or any other future events?
we all have to suffer for your breach of rules on here? No, I think not. Most of us can discuss respectfully. If you can't, you should leavesimple answer just close this thread please .
no sense in trying to reason with anyone here.
Lawsuits ? Under what part of the First Amendment does the press have a constitutional right to encrypted comms ??As much as you gripe and whine and moan, that is not going to stop the New York City council or the New York State senators as well as the public community groups the press the attorneys for the press as well as neighborhood watch committees to continue their lawsuits, to continue their legislations, and continue whatever necessary to ensure both the public and the press has the availability of NYPD dispatch communications in the clear....
SCOTUS taking up a lawsuit that would be thrown out based upon standing. Interesting.There are many layers of legal responsibility, just like any other legal issue, if the legislation by the state or the city is determined to be valid, you go with that... If you win a lawsuit in court you go with that, if you don't win a lawsuit in court you can always go to the appellate division and appeal, and just like some other entities, if you're not happy with the decision of the appellate court, you can appeal it all the way to the supreme Court if they will take the case....
I wouldn't call the majority of those legitimate, but I digress.The NYPD would have to totally vet "recognized" legitimate press and media. That would include television stations like WNBC TV WCBS TV WABC TV , newspapers such as The New York Post New York daily News the New York times cable news CNN Fox MSNBC.
No lawsuits yet, but from what I hear , they would not be based on the 1st amendment constitutional right.Lawsuits ? Under what part of the First Amendment does the press have a constitutional right to encrypted comms ??
my point was we could appeal any decision, all the way up the SC, if they would take the case.SCOTUS taking up a lawsuit that would be thrown out based upon standing. Interesting.
Neither of us are lawyers, so any answers here are just possibilities. My feeling is, this will be handled out of court. If you dont consider national legacy media legit, then, who is???I wouldn't call the majority of those legitimate, but I digress.