KE5TLF
Member
heh looking at Natchez north on Google earth. I can imagine that one would be a bugger to find visually. Over this way I doubt I would have ever found New Augusta without GPS. It's literally at the arse end of nowheresville LOL.
As far as naming goes, since 98% of these sites are new construction, this is the opportune time to document this information in it's original form, from the sites,(and other sources) while all (or most) of the signage is still in place. Over time, weather and vandals are sure to slowly deface this information (as apparently has allready happened at the New Augusta site) and I think we should establish as accurate accounting of this information as possible before it is lost. That's just my way of thinking. Certainly there is any number of ways to go about.
Another side to keeping site naming as "official" as possible is if/when someone were to make contact with some of the people responsible for designing and building the system, they could speak more accuratetly with them about things. Again, just the way I think.
As far as naming goes, since 98% of these sites are new construction, this is the opportune time to document this information in it's original form, from the sites,(and other sources) while all (or most) of the signage is still in place. Over time, weather and vandals are sure to slowly deface this information (as apparently has allready happened at the New Augusta site) and I think we should establish as accurate accounting of this information as possible before it is lost. That's just my way of thinking. Certainly there is any number of ways to go about.
Another side to keeping site naming as "official" as possible is if/when someone were to make contact with some of the people responsible for designing and building the system, they could speak more accuratetly with them about things. Again, just the way I think.