• To anyone looking to acquire commercial radio programming software:

    Please do not make requests for copies of radio programming software which is sold (or was sold) by the manufacturer for any monetary value. All requests will be deleted and a forum infraction issued. Making a request such as this is attempting to engage in software piracy and this forum cannot be involved or associated with this activity. The same goes for any private transaction via Private Message. Even if you attempt to engage in this activity in PM's we will still enforce the forum rules. Your PM's are not private and the administration has the right to read them if there's a hint to criminal activity.

    If you are having trouble legally obtaining software please state so. We do not want any hurt feelings when your vague post is mistaken for a free request. It is YOUR responsibility to properly word your request.

    To obtain Motorola software see the Sticky in the Motorola forum.

    The various other vendors often permit their dealers to sell the software online (i.e., Kenwood). Please use Google or some other search engine to find a dealer that sells the software. Typically each series or individual radio requires its own software package. Often the Kenwood software is less than $100 so don't be a cheapskate; just purchase it.

    For M/A Com/Harris/GE, etc: there are two software packages that program all current and past radios. One package is for conventional programming and the other for trunked programming. The trunked package is in upwards of $2,500. The conventional package is more reasonable though is still several hundred dollars. The benefit is you do not need multiple versions for each radio (unlike Motorola).

    This is a large and very visible forum. We cannot jeopardize the ability to provide the RadioReference services by allowing this activity to occur. Please respect this.

Tytera TYT/Tytera MD380 DMR HT

Status
Not open for further replies.

AK9R

Lead Wiki Manager and almost an Awesome Moderator
Staff member
Super Moderator
Joined
Jul 18, 2004
Messages
10,704
Reaction score
9,604
Location
Central Indiana
Now if 5 watts is the same on analog how come here is a difference between the analog power to digital in a sense of coverage.
As others have explained, a carrier at 5 watts is a carrier at 5 watts. When a 5-watt analog radio is transmitting at 5 watts, you can easily measure it with most general purpose watt meters. When a 5-watt DMR radio is transmitting in its time slot, you should read 5 watts on the meter if the meter is fast enough to catch the time slot--however, most general purpose watt meters are not fast enough.

I have seen the difference in coverage between analog and digital explained like this: As an analog signal presents a lower and lower amplitude at the receiver, it becomes gradually more difficult for the receiver to copy the signal and you eventually get to the point where the signal drops into the noise. OTOH, a digital signal, depending on the modulation, may still be detectable and decodable by the receiver at signal amplitudes where the analog signal is mostly static. The analog signal appears to fade away while the digital signal appears to remain copyable until it abruptly disappears. This is known as the "digital cliff".

So, the digital radio isn't necessarily transmitting with any more power than the analog signal, but the digital signal gives the impression that it was transmitted with more power because it's still copyable at greater distances or lower received amplitudes than the analog signal.
 

kayn1n32008

ØÆSØ Say it, say 'ENCRYPTION'
Joined
Sep 20, 2008
Messages
7,415
Reaction score
2,349
Location
Sector 001
Now if 5 watts is the same on analog how come here is a difference between the analog power to digital in a sense of coverage. From what I've read elsewhere 4 watts of analog power equates approximately to 1 watt of digital power. If the coverage is the same between both analog and digital on DMR it just seems confusing to me. That's all.
Forward Error Correction. RF is RF. What and how you modulate the RF is what is going to dictate how far it goes. The advantage to digital is that you can usually still decode signals that had it been analogue would only sound like static. I have been able to get full audio recovery with a signal that would only light up the RX LED on a XPR-6550. Had it been analogue, i would not have been able to understand what the person was saying.
 

johnls7424

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jul 22, 2012
Messages
1,324
Reaction score
0
Location
Somewhere in NJ
As others have explained, a carrier at 5 watts is a carrier at 5 watts. When a 5-watt analog radio is transmitting at 5 watts, you can easily measure it with most general purpose watt meters. When a 5-watt DMR radio is transmitting in its time slot, you should read 5 watts on the meter if the meter is fast enough to catch the time slot--however, most general purpose watt meters are not fast enough.

I have seen the difference in coverage between analog and digital explained like this: As an analog signal presents a lower and lower amplitude at the receiver, it becomes gradually more difficult for the receiver to copy the signal and you eventually get to the point where the signal drops into the noise. OTOH, a digital signal, depending on the modulation, may still be detectable and decodable by the receiver at signal amplitudes where the analog signal is mostly static. The analog signal appears to fade away while the digital signal appears to remain copyable until it abruptly disappears. This is known as the "digital cliff".

So, the digital radio isn't necessarily transmitting with any more power than the analog signal, but the digital signal gives the impression that it was transmitted with more power because it's still copyable at greater distances or lower received amplitudes than the analog signal.

Thank you for clarifying this
 

ea8cxv

Member
Joined
Aug 23, 2015
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
Location
IL28ED
Thanks for the explanation , these details are very important for those new to DMR and clumsy as me.
 

johnls7424

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jul 22, 2012
Messages
1,324
Reaction score
0
Location
Somewhere in NJ
Yeah it's worth emailing them for an input for an idea, but like Voyager said that format isn't as popular as it once was and for a 164 dollar on average radio that's from China... Yeah.. It's not looking like it
 

rescue161

KE4FHH
Database Admin
Joined
Jun 5, 2002
Messages
3,698
Reaction score
671
Location
Hubert, NC
Why is MDC-1200 a dying format


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It's like any technology that has a newer better alternative. MDC was better than MODAT, so MODAT died. MDC offered more details and could do more than MODAT, so it won out.

Digital signaling can do lots more than MDC, so MDC is beginning to die. Sure there are lots of people out there still using it, but it will become less used as time goes on.

Most people would rather have the ability to do full-on text messaging, rather than just a few programmed messages in their radios. Plus there is no noise for the users to hear or try to mask with DOS.
 

jeffm77

Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2008
Messages
380
Reaction score
10
Location
pittsburgh, pa
Question for you guys, Ok, I am trying to program my digital contacts. I go to digital contacts, then type in the name, leave the group call set to group call, because the system is set up as group call, now, I have several that use TG ID 1. When I enter my TG name and leave everything set to group call and I put in the 1, I get an error saying already in use and it automatically sets it to a 2. So, can i only use TG 1 once? Because if so, that really sucks. As I have several things around me that use the TG#1 on group call. I did notice that I can change to group call, all call, and private call. I tried that already and get nothing. So, how do I monitor everything that uses the same TG #? Thanks all. Jeff
 

rescue161

KE4FHH
Database Admin
Joined
Jun 5, 2002
Messages
3,698
Reaction score
671
Location
Hubert, NC
If it's a group call, just put it in once and then under the Channels Information, you make a new channel and point it back to the Digital Contact. You can do this for as many contacts that you have using the same Digital Contact. Just name them different names.

Once that is done, you go to the Zone Information folder and add in all of the channels for that zone.

Example:

Hospital uses Digital TG 1
Ham uses Digital TG 1
Police uses Digital TG 1

You put in TG1 once under Digital Contacts and name it something like TG1.

Under Channels Info, you'd put the following:

Hospital - 468.000, color code, slot, etc. - Point back to Digital Contact TG1 or whatever you named it.
Ham - 445.000, color code, slot, etc. - Point back to Digital Contact TG1 or whatever you named it.
Police - 460.000, color code, slot, etc. - Point back to Digital Contact TG1 or whatever you named it.

Under Zone Info:

You could add in whatever channels you want in each zone, whether you want police in one zone and ham in another, or if you want them all in one zone.
 

jeffm77

Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2008
Messages
380
Reaction score
10
Location
pittsburgh, pa
ok so i go to my contact list table and create a tg just called tg 1. i program my frequencies, then under the digital data column where it says contact name, i select tg 1 from the list. and i can add as many users that use tg1 as i want?
 

Voyager

Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2002
Messages
12,059
Reaction score
68
Most digital radios, if not all, will only allow one text tag (alias) for each TG. Maybe someday some manufacturer will release a radio that supports more than one digital system.
 

Forts

Mentor
Database Admin
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
7,017
Reaction score
1,313
Location
Ontario, Canada
That would be very handy for sure. It would almost need to be setup like the Astro series CPS does it... talkgroups per digital system. That would also allow for different radio ID's per system, which people have been after for quite a while...
 

NavyBOFH

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Aug 11, 2015
Messages
199
Reaction score
28
Location
Where idiots grow on trees
That would be very handy for sure. It would almost need to be setup like the Astro series CPS does it... talkgroups per digital system. That would also allow for different radio ID's per system, which people have been after for quite a while...


It should already be capable - that's all in firmware and programming. I think it's more of Motorola saying "no one in x market will need to do that" and everyone took trend. I'd personally love it because when making channels I have to get creative. There's 4 repeaters (two digital two analog) in Lexington alone - can't call all channels "Lexington" even if they're in different zones. So I have to name them all something goofy.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Forts

Mentor
Database Admin
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
7,017
Reaction score
1,313
Location
Ontario, Canada
Yeah, I'm in the same boat. Plus everyone around here likes to use the common talkgroup numbers... 1, 10, 100 etc. So you can't label them to a specific user.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top