Looks like all the VSP dispatch channels are not encrypted, Division 5 (Hampton Roads/Eastern Shore) is now silent.
Looks like all the VSP dispatch channels are not encrypted, Division 5 (Hampton Roads/Eastern Shore) is now silent.
Plenty of agencies in the clear voice personal information routinely. Including in VA.Giving the owner's name and address over the air might be a privacy concern but simply giving plate numbers to a dispatcher wouldn't be.
It was OTAP. They went to a secure update site to get new Programming. Other than that, I was not informed.Talked to a State Police user, they're using the same channel as before, so I'd guess mobile encryption was pushed out via OTAR. I assume a CAD message was sent out for Troopers to switch their portables to the ø option.
Yes, I know. But that info being broadcast in the clear is sometimes used as a justification for encryption by agencies that encrypt everything. And we need to be mindful of the fact that there were practices that were once considered acceptable until somebody with authority determined that they were no longer acceptable. Such as an ambulance service listing the names of the patients it transported in the local newspaper. At one time, California police agencies were allowed to transmit PII over open channels. Now they aren't - they have to use a secure method of communication, such as encrypted radio, MDT, or cell phones.Plenty of agencies in the clear voice personal information routinely. Including in VA.
My understanding (at least with DOF) was the update was done via Wifi. They drove to a VSP division headquarters and connected to their WiFi for the download. I don’t believe they even needed to get out of the vehicle.Was encryption pushed out via OTAR? The TGs remain the same, the radios are now transmitting encrypted.
Sounds reasonable. Updating radios wirelessly can be accomplished via private WiFi hotspots, usually located at secure facilities - like a police barrack.My understanding (at least with DOF) was the update was done via Wifi. They drove to a VSP division headquarters and connected to their WiFi for the download. I don’t believe they even needed to get out of the vehicle.
This is what happens when a law enforcement agency is in charge of your statewide radio network rather than a civilian agencyVDOT SSP just went dark in Div. 5. A d as far as running plates and protected info....they've been running that on MDT for a while sp that excuse doesn't hold water. Let's face it....if they can...they will
Eugene KG4AVE
They dont care that you care to listen!I've heard state troopers (and indeed other LEO's) commenting they don't like having to "be careful what they say on the radio". They may be referring to sensitive info (although they use MDT, encrypted TAC, cell phones), but I suspect the real reason is they don't like to maintain the radio discipline necessary when they know they can be heard. In any event...another one bites the dust.
Eugene KG4AVE
As someone who's been in the position to monitor encrypted LE comms, I've found that the radio discipline is the same before and after the switch. It doesn't become unfiltered chit-chat, it's exactly what it was before....but I suspect the real reason is they don't like to maintain the radio discipline necessary when they know they can be heard. In any event...another one bites the dust.
ExactlyAs someone who's been in the position to monitor encrypted LE comms, I've found that the radio discipline is the same before and after the switch. It doesn't become unfiltered chit-chat, it's exactly what it was before.
Maybe because everything is recorded wither encryption is used or not because of public safety records keeping, for example: DC 911 center issues.As someone who's been in the position to monitor encrypted LE comms, I've found that the radio discipline is the same before and after the switch. It doesn't become unfiltered chit-chat, it's exactly what it was before.