VSP Division 3 - now encrypted?

Status
Not open for further replies.

LEH

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 23, 2003
Messages
1,494
Reaction score
39
Location
Yorktown, Virginia
Looks like all the VSP dispatch channels are not encrypted, Division 5 (Hampton Roads/Eastern Shore) is now silent. :mad:
 

hill

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
2,167
Reaction score
1,454
Location
Middle River, MD
Looks like all the VSP dispatch channels are not encrypted, Division 5 (Hampton Roads/Eastern Shore) is now silent.


I think you mean now encrypted. You post has not and think it should be now.
 

GB1439

Member
Joined
May 17, 2024
Messages
140
Reaction score
78
Location
Northern VA
Giving the owner's name and address over the air might be a privacy concern but simply giving plate numbers to a dispatcher wouldn't be.
Plenty of agencies in the clear voice personal information routinely. Including in VA.
 

Hbright

Active Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2018
Messages
1,424
Reaction score
2,644
Talked to a State Police user, they're using the same channel as before, so I'd guess mobile encryption was pushed out via OTAR. I assume a CAD message was sent out for Troopers to switch their portables to the ø option.
 

dickie757

Wired
Joined
Apr 25, 2017
Messages
629
Reaction score
300
Location
Out of range
Talked to a State Police user, they're using the same channel as before, so I'd guess mobile encryption was pushed out via OTAR. I assume a CAD message was sent out for Troopers to switch their portables to the ø option.
It was OTAP. They went to a secure update site to get new Programming. Other than that, I was not informed.
 

Hbright

Active Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2018
Messages
1,424
Reaction score
2,644
Per VSP user:

They were told to switch their portables over to the ø option and there was “a button” on the APX8500s “we had to press.” The Troopers had brought their radios into the shop over the past few months to get their radios reprogrammed.
 

fredva

Member
Feed Provider
Joined
Mar 19, 2007
Messages
2,305
Reaction score
730
Location
Virginia/West Virginia
Plenty of agencies in the clear voice personal information routinely. Including in VA.
Yes, I know. But that info being broadcast in the clear is sometimes used as a justification for encryption by agencies that encrypt everything. And we need to be mindful of the fact that there were practices that were once considered acceptable until somebody with authority determined that they were no longer acceptable. Such as an ambulance service listing the names of the patients it transported in the local newspaper. At one time, California police agencies were allowed to transmit PII over open channels. Now they aren't - they have to use a secure method of communication, such as encrypted radio, MDT, or cell phones.
 
Last edited:

tglendye

Blue Ridge Mountains, Shenandoah River- VA
Joined
Jun 15, 2002
Messages
1,985
Reaction score
246
Location
Virginia
Was encryption pushed out via OTAR? The TGs remain the same, the radios are now transmitting encrypted.
My understanding (at least with DOF) was the update was done via Wifi. They drove to a VSP division headquarters and connected to their WiFi for the download. I don’t believe they even needed to get out of the vehicle.
 

hill

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
2,167
Reaction score
1,454
Location
Middle River, MD
I bought a used G5 to monitor State Police in October 2023 with being in Virginia a few times a week. It was good while it lasted.

Without having much to listen to on Stars anymore have added many more county TRS to add fire departments. Still have to use scanners to monitor Richmond and surrounding areas still being on a Smartzone.
 

maus92

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 23, 2004
Messages
8,773
Reaction score
2,586
Location
OCMD
My understanding (at least with DOF) was the update was done via Wifi. They drove to a VSP division headquarters and connected to their WiFi for the download. I don’t believe they even needed to get out of the vehicle.
Sounds reasonable. Updating radios wirelessly can be accomplished via private WiFi hotspots, usually located at secure facilities - like a police barrack.
 

LeSueurC

IBEW Local 50
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Nov 6, 2014
Messages
1,337
Reaction score
314
Location
Virginia Beach, VA
There’s multiple ways they could’ve switched. Most of the time, they’ll do OTAP, and the radio tech will copy the same exact code plug except for having the TG strapped for encryption, that way when they’re ready to switch, all the end users has to do is switch to the Encrypted zone and all the TG’s and everything is the same
 

Eugene

Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
615
Reaction score
57
Location
Portsmouth, VA
VDOT SSP just went dark in Div. 5. A d as far as running plates and protected info....they've been running that on MDT for a while sp that excuse doesn't hold water. Let's face it....if they can...they will

Eugene KG4AVE
 

mocofeed

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jul 18, 2018
Messages
108
Reaction score
17
VDOT SSP just went dark in Div. 5. A d as far as running plates and protected info....they've been running that on MDT for a while sp that excuse doesn't hold water. Let's face it....if they can...they will

Eugene KG4AVE
This is what happens when a law enforcement agency is in charge of your statewide radio network rather than a civilian agency
 

Eugene

Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
615
Reaction score
57
Location
Portsmouth, VA
I've heard state troopers (and indeed other LEO's) commenting they don't like having to "be careful what they say on the radio". They may be referring to sensitive info (although they use MDT, encrypted TAC, cell phones), but I suspect the real reason is they don't like to maintain the radio discipline necessary when they know they can be heard. In any event...another one bites the dust.

Eugene KG4AVE
 

n3obl

ØAES-1024
Database Admin
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
2,282
Reaction score
1,550
Location
PA
I've heard state troopers (and indeed other LEO's) commenting they don't like having to "be careful what they say on the radio". They may be referring to sensitive info (although they use MDT, encrypted TAC, cell phones), but I suspect the real reason is they don't like to maintain the radio discipline necessary when they know they can be heard. In any event...another one bites the dust.

Eugene KG4AVE
They dont care that you care to listen!
 

BoxAlarm187

Level 6 RR Member (Since 1998)
Joined
Mar 19, 2003
Messages
1,740
Reaction score
235
Location
Old Dominion
...but I suspect the real reason is they don't like to maintain the radio discipline necessary when they know they can be heard. In any event...another one bites the dust.
As someone who's been in the position to monitor encrypted LE comms, I've found that the radio discipline is the same before and after the switch. It doesn't become unfiltered chit-chat, it's exactly what it was before.
 

kg4icg

Crazy Trucking Mechanic
Joined
Nov 28, 2003
Messages
436
Reaction score
42
Location
Woodbridge, Va
As someone who's been in the position to monitor encrypted LE comms, I've found that the radio discipline is the same before and after the switch. It doesn't become unfiltered chit-chat, it's exactly what it was before.
Maybe because everything is recorded wither encryption is used or not because of public safety records keeping, for example: DC 911 center issues.
 

maus92

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 23, 2004
Messages
8,773
Reaction score
2,586
Location
OCMD
I can say that in general, nothing changes wrt how and what info is transmitted when an agency transitions to encryption. Cell phones are still used when info not meant for general distribution is exchanged. Also, lots of info is exchanged via MCT/MDT and in-car email and never heard over the air.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top