zzdiesel
Member
I'm getting it here in Kennett too. Except it is 3F7 instead of 3F8. It is constant. I wish we had the other channels to set up a P25 setup. I'm going to lock it out till I get more info. Thanks Semo.
whats the latest info on MSHP new system?
- Thread starter SpecialAgent
- Start date
- Status
semo
Member
I have 152.5400, 159.4650, and 159.2850 in the system. 152.54 is the control channel and I have seen 159.285 active when Sikeston PD talks using talkgroup 3402. I have heard no other users so far.
zzdiesel
Member
Is it working consistnant though?
semo
Member
Sikeston PD is testing it now. Yes it does seem to work. You actually just need the control channel to pick up users on the system.
I know that I monitored the new system in Missouri when I was traveling. Although I am not 100% certain, I believe it was around the Springfield area off of IH44.
iamhere300
Member
I don't think you would have heard it in Springfield. Way too far away.
You might be right. I think I erased that scan list or I would have attempted to review the hit count. Thanks for clearing that up.
semo
Member
Heard today:
Sikeston Fire 3404
Unknown EMS 3412
Radio Testing 158
Sikeston Fire 3404
Unknown EMS 3412
Radio Testing 158
scannerowner
Member
You guys should try posting this in the other forum that talks about sites/talkgroups. I'm getting excited to hear that there is some talking on the new sites, wondering how I need to program it in when it comes to NW Missouri in a few years. . .
iamhere300
Member
The rest of this week, and possibly part of next week will be drive testing to ensure the system covers 95% of the county. This is just the Bloomfield site online. Sikeston will most likely be hot next week.
zzdiesel
Member
Semo, would you post a scan list for the Sikeston tower? Thank you.
semo
Member
Not sure what your asking but I simply put 152.54 in a trunked P25 auto system. I have the system open with the use of a wildcard.Thats all I have right now in my PSR500. This works for the Bloomfield site when the system is used.
kpoe_28
Member
OK guy's I'm sure that I'm not the only heard the dreaded E word being used last night.....Encryption!!! 
talkpair
Member
It's one of those things I'm sure they have to test.........
Whether they use it for routine "cow in the roadway" calls is yet to be known.
Whether they use it for routine "cow in the roadway" calls is yet to be known.
iamhere300
Member
The system is fully capable of encryption - it is up to the using agency as to whether or not they deploy it.
talkpair
Member
I'm not finding 152.54 licensed to anyone around the boot heel..........or even an application for that frequency.
zzdiesel
Member
I wish I heard the Bloomfield tower better here in Kennett. It is so staticy. I know my antenna needs to be higher.
nd5y
Member
ULS License - Part 22 VHF/UHF Paging (excluding 931MHz) License - WQAH684 - Communications Equipment Inc.
Because it is a part 22 paging frequency.
They are market based and don't show up in the normal database searches because there are no individual site licenses like the part 90 services have.
Some Part 22 licensees can sell or lease their frequencies to other users.
This VHF P25 system near me is like that: Parker County (Project 25) Trunking System, Parker County, Texas - Scanner Frequencies
Notice that one of the channels on this system is also 152.54.
New license application has been filed with the FCC, for a transmitter site located in Sikeston.
FCC Web site.
Supporting Letter.
73s
Ron
FCC Web site.
Supporting Letter.
73s
Ron
semo
Member
Those frequencies belonged to Sikeston DPS (159.0150) and Scott County EMS (159.2100). Pro96com shows that the adjacent site for the Bloomfield tower to be 155.7150. It looks like 155.7150 will be the Sikeston tower control channel.
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
