Any word on the status of NXDN support?

Status
Not open for further replies.

buddrousa

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 5, 2003
Messages
12,157
Location
Retired 40 Year Firefighter NW Tenn
Not really. The 436hp is so deaf. The 996p2 with NXDN would be great tho. A nice scanner that doesn't need a wall of loosely put together excuses to justify it.

I also have 2 536's and 2 996p2's and a TRX2 running all sharing a common antenna feeding 2 8 port stridesburg active splitters and my 536's hold their own very well. in my car 1 TRX1 PRO668 Pro18 and a 436 all running same RS800 antennas and my 436 out shines the others and the TRX is used only for NXDN.
 

jonwienke

More Info Coming Soon!
Joined
Jul 18, 2014
Messages
13,409
Location
VA
Not really. The 436hp is so deaf.

Not true of the unit I own, nor is it true of any of the dozens of units I have tested while doing GPS installations. It's probably the antenna you are using.
 

garys

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 13, 2002
Messages
6,242
Location
Texas
I only have three x36HP radios, but they all seem to work fine on UHF and VHF. I think the receivers are super hot on 700-900.

As with any radio, a good antenna is key. The ones that come with the 436HP are not all that good.

Not true of the unit I own, nor is it true of any of the dozens of units I have tested while doing GPS installations. It's probably the antenna you are using.
 

k3fs

Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2010
Messages
275
Location
Western PA
The 436 has a well documented problem with receiving VHF and UHF. It can be a rather poor receiver on VHF and UHF when used portable. See the bellow thread. It is still unknown how Uniden will handle this defect.

https://forums.radioreference.com/u...ion-issues-due-noise-battery-compartment.html

Uniden has announced features before they were ready for release. In fact, I am still waiting for features that were promised when the product was announced. They have yet to release the advertised advanced analysis features for the 436. DMR was announced before its release. It was at least a couple of months before there was a final DMR release. They put out beta versions, to beat Whistler. There is no tipping off to Whistler at this point. Whistler announced NXDN just shy of a year and a half ago, and released it almost a year ago. Uniden is still trying to catch up. Obviously Whistler is not concerned about tipping off Uniden to their plans.
 

jonwienke

More Info Coming Soon!
Joined
Jul 18, 2014
Messages
13,409
Location
VA
The 436 has a well documented problem with receiving VHF and UHF. It can be a rather poor receiver on VHF and UHF when used portable. See the bellow thread. It is still unknown how Uniden will handle this defect.

Actually, Uniden fixed the issue about a year and a half ago. They haven't made any public statements on the issue, but the issue has been resolved in every 436 scanner manufactured since mid-2016.

Uniden has announced features before they were ready for release.

Yes, and they caught a lot of crap for doing so (as you pointed out), and so they no longer make announcements until release is imminent.
 

k3fs

Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2010
Messages
275
Location
Western PA
Uniden fixed the issue over a year ago. It is unknown when last year they fixed it. All other radios produced and repaired under the repair program until then are affected.

False advertising is wrong. Uniden said they would keep us updated on the status of the release of the advanced analysis features. There have been no updates for years now.

They still announced DMR before it was ready. In fact they took payment for DMR before it was ready. They released beta versions for over a month until it was ready. They are inconsistent in that matter. Last excuse given was not wanting to tip off Whistler. Whistler tipped them off almost a year and a half ago.

When there is a problem, admit it as soon as possible.
Customers are not stupid. Ignoring or denying a legitimate problem is not the way to handle it.
 
Joined
Feb 3, 2009
Messages
2,078
Location
So Far Away....
They still announced DMR before it was ready. In fact they took payment for DMR before it was ready.

DMR was Pre-Released.
Reduced Payment was a compensation for the fixes that would follow with a Pre-release.

This was Clearly noted in the disclaimer that was provided.

Its not Unidens issue that people didnt read the disclaimer, then proceeded to post regarding
they had been shorted, or that DMR was too much to fine tune..

I wont defend Uniden. But I also dont buy scanners for the WiFi..Or Phones for the Camera...Or Cars for the soundsystem..
 

jonwienke

More Info Coming Soon!
Joined
Jul 18, 2014
Messages
13,409
Location
VA
DMR was initially released as a beta, and was clearly designated as such. It's your problem if you didn't bother to read the description before purchasing.
 

garys

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 13, 2002
Messages
6,242
Location
Texas
I bought the pre release of the DMR knowing that the release would come later and that there would be a period of beta testing involved. I, along with others here, participated in the beta and in the end the product that came out was very good.

I hope that Uniden does the same thing with NXDN if/when they release it. The user input made the DMR upgrade better than it would have been otherwise and I expect that NXDN would be the same.
 

K2RNI

Member
Joined
Jun 1, 2016
Messages
281
Location
Kingman, AZ
The 436 has a well documented problem with receiving VHF and UHF. It can be a rather poor receiver on VHF and UHF when used portable. See the bellow thread. It is still unknown how Uniden will handle this defect.

https://forums.radioreference.com/u...ion-issues-due-noise-battery-compartment.html

Uniden has announced features before they were ready for release. In fact, I am still waiting for features that were promised when the product was announced. They have yet to release the advertised advanced analysis features for the 436. DMR was announced before its release. It was at least a couple of months before there was a final DMR release. They put out beta versions, to beat Whistler. There is no tipping off to Whistler at this point. Whistler announced NXDN just shy of a year and a half ago, and released it almost a year ago. Uniden is still trying to catch up. Obviously Whistler is not concerned about tipping off Uniden to their plans.

Even with a decent antennas it still just sits there quietly on things the 396 picks up perfectly. Beats an RTL-SDR sure but otherwise still almost a very fancy brick/paperweight. But when you wasted $500 on it it just can't be wrong and you have to make excuses for it.

The TRX1 blows it away, only new digital that holds up to the high performance of the 396xt on both digi and analog, plus NXDN. No idea why the 436 couldnt do that instead of provoice, barely any of those types of edacs left. Uniden lately, oy vey.
 

racingfan360

Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2005
Messages
1,180
I'm with many of you on this: I just don't get Uniden at all.....

ALL of their genuine competitors now offer, or have announced a scanner that does NXDN in some shape or form. I can't see there being anything particularly commercially sensitive about saying they have in the pipeline anymore, unless of course they simply aren't working on it at all.

I'm thinking that if you're in need of a NXDN scanner, the best marketing for Uniden's competitors is Uniden themselves, with their wall of silence. Some offer features that I doubt Uniden will ever offer - eg the AORs offer NXDN desramble.
 

SOFA_KING

Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2004
Messages
1,581
Location
SE Florida
UPMan did hint there would be something "we would go ape over" in the works, so I would assume (dangerous, I know) this might be it. Of course I would also like to have Fusion and D-STAR...basically all the digital modes, but I'll "buy" what I can.

I hope we get some good news on new digital modes soon. I prefer how Whistler handles future development announcements. Perhaps Uniden is afraid of announcing anything after failing to deliver on advertised X36 features ALTHOUGH, this secrecy policy predated the X36 line. Bad customer relations IMO.

Phil
 

budevans

Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2009
Messages
2,175
Location
Cleveland, Ohio
2 things you can try

Even with a decent antennas it still just sits there quietly on things the 396 picks up perfectly. Beats an RTL-SDR sure but otherwise still almost a very fancy brick/paperweight. But when you wasted $500 on it it just can't be wrong and you have to make excuses for it.

The TRX1 blows it away, only new digital that holds up to the high performance of the 396xt on both digi and analog, plus NXDN. No idea why the 436 couldnt do that instead of provoice, barely any of those types of edacs left. Uniden lately, oy vey.

Folks on the forums here came up with two simple methods that improve the 436's VHF & UHF reception.

1. Putting foil tape on the battery compartment cover.

2. Use the SMA/BNC adapter that came with your radio and use a BNC antenna. It makes a huge difference on my 436.

There are U Tube video's demonstrating both methods.

Last but not least. Some time in 2016 Uniden added a capacitor to the 436, which resolves the noise issue and improves the receive performance.
 

troymail

Silent Key
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
9,981
Location
Supply (Lockwood Inlet area), NC
Folks on the forums here came up with two simple methods that improve the 436's VHF & UHF reception.

1. Putting foil tape on the battery compartment cover.

2. Use the SMA/BNC adapter that came with your radio and use a BNC antenna. It makes a huge difference on my 436.

There are U Tube video's demonstrating both methods.

Last but not least. Some time in 2016 Uniden added a capacitor to the 436, which resolves the noise issue and improves the receive performance.

Or this > http://forums.radioreference.com/un...noise-battery-compartment-48.html#post2835027
 

jonwienke

More Info Coming Soon!
Joined
Jul 18, 2014
Messages
13,409
Location
VA
Even with a decent antennas it still just sits there quietly on things the 396 picks up perfectly. Beats an RTL-SDR sure but otherwise still almost a very fancy brick/paperweight. But when you wasted $500 on it it just can't be wrong and you have to make excuses for it.

I'm not "making excuses", I'm sharing the results of my experience comparison testing dozens of customer 436 scanners to my own 436, as well as to other models of scanners and radios. The unit you have may not perform well, but it is NOT accurate to assume that your unit's underperformance is typical of all 436 scanners.
 

HogDriver

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Feb 3, 2007
Messages
981
Location
Oklahoma City, Ok.
NXDN?

How long do we wait for them to come up with something???? I’ve had my radio almost a year now! I’m really not wanting to add a second radio in my truck! I would think something would be better than nothing.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top