We are coming up on almost 90 years of unencrypted police communication... and in that time we have seen no evidence of pervasive abuse by non-police interlopers.
What we HAVE seen is massive use of recording devices has shed light on police misconduct at an alarming rate. The internet has aided in the dissemination of those recordings.
The Philando Castile story is a CLASSIC example. Police say:
A) He was pulled over because of a faulty tail light
B) He was reaching for his gun
What we learned, from the unencrypted police dispatch audio (that I believe was obtained from a RR user) is that no, he was NOT pulled over for a faulty tail light. He was racially profiled because he had a "wide set nose", and the tail light excuse was used solely for PC to pull him over. And now he is dead.
And the police SAID he was reaching for his gun (after announcing that he was legally carrying).
So, yeah, the police are going to do EVERYTHING they can to avoid being caught with their pants down.... AGAIN, and encryption is one of those things.....
Except that 99.99999% of public safety radio and phone communications are recorded whether they are encrypted or not and the recordings are subject to Subpoena or any form of public records acts that your state has in place.