PA Statewide P25 Phase 2 System

crazyboy

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Apr 10, 2004
Messages
808
Location
NJ
We are coming up on almost 90 years of unencrypted police communication... and in that time we have seen no evidence of pervasive abuse by non-police interlopers.



What we HAVE seen is massive use of recording devices has shed light on police misconduct at an alarming rate. The internet has aided in the dissemination of those recordings.



The Philando Castile story is a CLASSIC example. Police say:



A) He was pulled over because of a faulty tail light

B) He was reaching for his gun



What we learned, from the unencrypted police dispatch audio (that I believe was obtained from a RR user) is that no, he was NOT pulled over for a faulty tail light. He was racially profiled because he had a "wide set nose", and the tail light excuse was used solely for PC to pull him over. And now he is dead.



And the police SAID he was reaching for his gun (after announcing that he was legally carrying).



So, yeah, the police are going to do EVERYTHING they can to avoid being caught with their pants down.... AGAIN, and encryption is one of those things.....



Except that 99.99999% of public safety radio and phone communications are recorded whether they are encrypted or not and the recordings are subject to Subpoena or any form of public records acts that your state has in place.
 

crazyboy

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Apr 10, 2004
Messages
808
Location
NJ
I know everyone is entitled to their opinion but I don't get why everyone is against encryption. I completely support it on the LE side of things. Correct me if I'm wrong, if the field user radio and console have the right encryption keys, and they patch across with another agency, the encryption factor doesn't matter because it will pass the audio through the patched channels clearly.

I don't foresee people having to use this option a lot but I could be wrong.



The field users don't need additional encryption keys, the console would need an additional resource (channel) for each channel to be in the patch and be configured with the correct keys for each channel. The console will decrypt the packets and then re-encrypt them with the proper key for the patched channel. You can even patch an encrypted channel to a non encrypted channel but you obviously loose all encryption on the non encrypted side.
 

RadioDitch

Field Operations Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 24, 2010
Messages
3,096
Location
Wandering Around
Except that 99.99999% of public safety radio and phone communications are recorded whether they are encrypted or not and the recordings are subject to Subpoena or any form of public records acts that your state has in place.

Normally I stay out of these encryption debates, cause they're a black hole...but....

However, history has shown that just because public safety communications, in all forms, are subject to subpoena and open public records acts, that what is made public by many of the agencies themselves is frequently selective or edited in favor of said agency. It's an unpopular fact, however, it is a fact.

And often having the unedited, full dispatch (non-tactical) audio out there or immediately monitorable by the press from receivers not in control of the agencies themselves, has forced the hand of the involved agency to be completely transparent when they may have not been so otherwise, even if just by remaining silent.
 

scnrfrq

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 26, 2002
Messages
973
Location
Erie, PA
Anything new with the Warren County testing? According to their schedule, Erie County testing should start in late August. Does anyone know how to differentiate the testing of PSP and DCNR?
 

ekim223

Member
Joined
Apr 9, 2010
Messages
114
Location
Crawford County PA
This is what I have so far for the P25 P2 in Warren County:
10007: Encrypted
10132: Encrypted
11715: PennDot Warren Co
11716: PennDot ???
11719: PennDot
12000: unknown
12003: PennDot?
TG: 10007 & 10132 are encrypted. #11715 is definitely Warren Co PennDot by the locations they are discussing. #11716 sounds like PennDot by its discussing flaggers and cones. #11719 again may have been PennDot but I cannot be sure at this time. #12000 seems like radio checks. Once a unit was calling Harrisburg with a radio check. #12003 mostly appears as key ups but no talking. But I did catch a few snips of talking a couple times discussing trucks and parts.
 

scnrfrq

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 26, 2002
Messages
973
Location
Erie, PA
This is what I have so far for the P25 P2 in Warren County:
10007: Encrypted
10132: Encrypted
11715: PennDot Warren Co
11716: PennDot ???
11719: PennDot
12000: unknown
12003: PennDot?
TG: 10007 & 10132 are encrypted. #11715 is definitely Warren Co PennDot by the locations they are discussing. #11716 sounds like PennDot by its discussing flaggers and cones. #11719 again may have been PennDot but I cannot be sure at this time. #12000 seems like radio checks. Once a unit was calling Harrisburg with a radio check. #12003 mostly appears as key ups but no talking. But I did catch a few snips of talking a couple times discussing trucks and parts.

Thanks for the update. Are there any DCNR parks in Warren County that have radios?
 

HM1529

Pennsylvania DB Admin
Database Admin
Joined
Jul 16, 2003
Messages
3,156
Location
West of the Atlantic Ocean
Last edited:

HM1529

Pennsylvania DB Admin
Database Admin
Joined
Jul 16, 2003
Messages
3,156
Location
West of the Atlantic Ocean
Anyone know if these new PA Commonwealth licenses are for the new system? Not much info given:
Erie County, Pennsylvania (PA) Last 50 FCC License Grants

Those UHF licenses are for PennDOT GPS mapping.

Here is a link to a powerpoint that gives some idea of what it is for.

https://www.ngs.noaa.gov/heightmod/Presentations/PA/PANC1Harpster2011GLRHMCPSSCORSVRS.ppt

On the WQZT917 license, it says this: 90.20a - GOVERNMENT ENTITY FOR THE TRANSMISSION OF COMMUNICATIONS ESSENTIAL TO OFFICIAL GPS/RTK ACTIVITIES OF THE LICENSEE.
 

scnrfrq

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 26, 2002
Messages
973
Location
Erie, PA
From the P25 schedule, it looks like Erie County testing will possibly begin around 8/20. I finally took the plunge and got a BCD436. Still learning how to set it up, but I did finally figure out how to make favorite lists for all the local activity as it stands now.

Not so sure I'll be able to easily figure out how to add the new state P25 system though. I'm in northern Erie County, and I'd like to provide monitoring reports as soon as testing begins here. So, if any of you guys who've been listening in Warren County can give me any tips on how to set this up, it would be appreciated.

Thanks.
 

Railbender

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Sep 10, 2008
Messages
357
Location
NW PA
Not so sure I'll be able to easily figure out how to add the new state P25 system though. I'm in northern Erie County, and I'd like to provide monitoring reports as soon as testing begins here. So, if any of you guys who've been listening in Warren County can give me any tips on how to set this up, it would be appreciated.

Thanks.
For practice try the Chautauqua Co. P25 system. You won't be able to get it from home but on PI or anywhere near the waterfront it should work with the rubber duck.
 

scnrfrq

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 26, 2002
Messages
973
Location
Erie, PA
For practice try the Chautauqua Co. P25 system. You won't be able to get it from home but on PI or anywhere near the waterfront it should work with the rubber duck.

Ok I will. I have listened to it online, so I know what it should sound like. Took awhile to get used to that "unique" sound.
 

HM1529

Pennsylvania DB Admin
Database Admin
Joined
Jul 16, 2003
Messages
3,156
Location
West of the Atlantic Ocean
From the P25 schedule, it looks like Erie County testing will possibly begin around 8/20. I finally took the plunge and got a BCD436. Still learning how to set it up, but I did finally figure out how to make favorite lists for all the local activity as it stands now.

Not so sure I'll be able to easily figure out how to add the new state P25 system though. I'm in northern Erie County, and I'd like to provide monitoring reports as soon as testing begins here. So, if any of you guys who've been listening in Warren County can give me any tips on how to set this up, it would be appreciated.

Thanks.

The new state system would be available under Warren and Dauphin counties in the Sentinel software. You would just need to add it to whatever favorite list you want it in. Then, you can set it to search new groups (I forget the exact wording, no software in front of me right now). You could also manually add new sites to the system in your favorites list. So, you could check all the licenses issued and then add each one and name it something so that it catches your eye if traffic comes across it.
 

scnrfrq

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 26, 2002
Messages
973
Location
Erie, PA
The new state system would be available under Warren and Dauphin counties in the Sentinel software. You would just need to add it to whatever favorite list you want it in. Then, you can set it to search new groups (I forget the exact wording, no software in front of me right now). You could also manually add new sites to the system in your favorites list. So, you could check all the licenses issued and then add each one and name it something so that it catches your eye if traffic comes across it.

OK, I have it set up in a favorites list, and I added the 3 Erie County sites listed in the license. I have set it to search ID's also. I know that PSP is encrypted in Warren County, so if it is in Erie County also will I hear anything or will any talkgroup ID's show up? If any other ID's show up, say for PennDOT, will it give me the option to add them to the favorites list as they show up?
 

scan-pa

RRDB Admin
Database Admin
Joined
Dec 18, 2002
Messages
1,001
Location
Lebanon, Pa.
I have yet to hear a single voice in the clear. The entire system is encrypted so far.

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk
 
Top