skinnyb82
Member
This is as just as much about CYA as the old eavesdropping statute that made it a Class 4 felony to record a law enforcement officer while on duty when there is zero expectation of privacy. That was also for officer safety. Safe from what? "We don't want you (insert completely legal activity here)." Sounds like it's meant to mitigate the risk of having a 42 USC Sec. 1983 action filed against the agency and/or individual officers for (insert protected right or rights infringed upon under the color of law). Since that garbage was put down, I've noticed that LEOs now won't even think of pulling the same garbage as they did when it was illegal to record them. Then again, there was an aggravated battery conviction vacated by the appellate court in my district after police seized every phone from everyone at the scene and proceeded to destroy the footage of the crime, thereby ruining her chance at a fair trial, but no one who was recording was actually arrested. I digress.
The "this crime was really this crime because we want our stats to look better than they are," well, Chicago pulls the same crap on an entirely different level and therefore cannot even report crime stats because its "methods" (an apple is an orange, and also maybe a pear, but who knows) do not meet FBI standards.
I'm all for officer safety, but complete encryption is not only unnecessary but its main "benefit" is the very law enforcement agency that is already in trouble. It's CYA. And inter-agency communication is neutered by this kind of thing. Encryption should be reserved for tactical teams who are in the sensitive phase of a call out where it's critical that their position not be broadcast to the world.
Sent from my VS987 using Tapatalk
The "this crime was really this crime because we want our stats to look better than they are," well, Chicago pulls the same crap on an entirely different level and therefore cannot even report crime stats because its "methods" (an apple is an orange, and also maybe a pear, but who knows) do not meet FBI standards.
I'm all for officer safety, but complete encryption is not only unnecessary but its main "benefit" is the very law enforcement agency that is already in trouble. It's CYA. And inter-agency communication is neutered by this kind of thing. Encryption should be reserved for tactical teams who are in the sensitive phase of a call out where it's critical that their position not be broadcast to the world.
Sent from my VS987 using Tapatalk